Draining for Profit, and Draining for HealthGeorge E. WaringEdition 1Project GutenbergOctober 4, 200619465
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and
with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it
away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg
License online at www.gutenberg.org/license
Library of Congress ClassificationOctober 4, 2006Steven Giacomelli,Joshua Hutchinson andThe Online Distributed Proofreading Team(This file was produced from images produced by Core Historical Literature in Agriculture (CHLA), Cornell University)Posted to Project Gutenberg
figure { text-align: center; page-float: 'htbp' }
.floatleft { float: left; margin-right: 2em }
.floatright { float: right; margin-left: 2em }
.w90 { }
.w50 { }
.w20 { }
.w05 { }
@media pdf {
.w90 { width: 90% }
.w50 { width: 50% }
.w20 { width: 20% }
.w05 { width: 5% }
}
New York
Orange Judd & Company,
245 Broadway.
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1867, by
ORANGE JUDD & CO.
At the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States for this
Southern District of New-York.
Lovejoy & Son,
Electrotypers and Stereotypers.
15 Vandewater street N.Y.
In presenting this book to the public the writer desires
to say that, having in view the great importance of thorough
work in land draining, and believing it advisable to
avoid every thing which might be construed into an approval
of half-way measures, he has purposely taken the
most radical view of the whole subject, and has endeavored
to emphasize the necessity for the utmost thoroughness in
all draining operations, from the first staking of the lines
to the final filling-in of the ditches.
That it is sometimes necessary, because of limited means,
or limited time, or for other good reasons, to drain partially
or imperfectly, or with a view only to temporary results,
is freely acknowledged. In these cases the occasion for
less completeness in the work must determine the extent
to which the directions herein laid down are to be disregarded;
but it is believed that, even in such cases, the
principles on which those directions are founded should
be always borne in mind.
Newport, R.I., 1867.
Illustrations
Contents
CHAPTER I. - LAND TO BE DRAINED AND THE REASONS WHY.
Land which requires draining hangs out a sign of its
condition, more or less clear, according to its circumstances,
but always unmistakable to the practiced eye. Sometimes
it is the broad banner of standing water, or dark, wet streaks
in plowed land, when all should be dry and of even color;
sometimes only a fluttering rag of distress in curling corn,
or wide-cracking clay, or feeble, spindling, shivering grain,
which has survived a precarious winter, on the ice-stilts
that have stretched its crown above a wet soil; sometimes
the quarantine flag of rank growth and dank miasmatic fogs.
To recognize these indications is the first office of the
drainer; the second, to remove the causes from which they
arise.
If a rule could be adopted which would cover the varied
circumstances of different soils, it would be somewhat as
follows: All lands, of whatever texture or kind, in which
the spaces between the particles of soil are filled with water,
(whether from rain or from springs,) within less than four
feet of the surface of the ground, except during and
immediately after heavy rains, require draining.
Of course, the particles of the soil cannot be made dry,
nor should they be; but, although they should be moist
themselves, they should be surrounded with air, not with
water. To illustrate this: suppose that water be poured
into a barrel filled with chips of wood until it runs over at
the top. The spaces between the chips will be filled with
water, and the chips themselves will absorb enough to become
thoroughly wet;—this represents the worst condition
of a wet soil. If an opening be made at the bottom of the
barrel, the water which fills the spaces between the chips
will be drawn off, and its place will be taken by air, while
the chips themselves will remain wet from the water which
they hold by absorption. A drain at the bottom of a wet
field draws away the water from the free spaces between
its particles, and its place is taken by air, while the particles
hold, by attraction, the moisture necessary to a healthy
condition of the soil.
There are vast areas of land in this country which do
not need draining. The whole range of sands, gravels,
light loams and moulds allow water to pass freely through
them, and are sufficiently drained by nature, provided,
they are as open at the bottom as throughout the mass.
A sieve filled with gravel will drain perfectly; a basin filled
with the same gravel will not drain at all. More than this,
a sieve filled with the stiffest clay, if not "puddled,"
—Puddling is the kneading or rubbing of clay with water, a process by
which it becomes almost impervious, retaining this property until thoroughly
dried, when its close union is broken by the shrinking of its
parts. Puddled clay remains impervious as long as it is saturated with
water, and it does not entirely lose this quality until it has been pulverized
in a dry state.
A small proportion of clay is sufficient to injure the porousness of
the soil by puddling.—A clay subsoil is puddled by being plowed
over when too wet, and the injury is of considerable duration. Rain
water collected in hollows of stiff land, by the simple movement given
it by the wind, so puddles the surface that it holds the water while the
adjacent soil is dry and porous.
The term puddling will often be used in this work, and the reader will
understand, from this explanation, the meaning with which it is employed.
will drain completely, and so will heavy clay soils on porous
and well drained subsoils. Money expended in draining
such lands as do not require the operation is, of course,
wasted; and when there is doubt as to the requirement,
tests should be made before the outlay for so
costly work is encountered.
There is, on the other hand, much land which only by
thorough-draining can be rendered profitable for cultivation,
or healthful for residence, and very much more, described
as "ordinarily dry land," which draining would
greatly improve in both productive value and salubrity.
The Surface Indications of the necessity for draining
are various. Those of actual swamps need no description;
those of land in cultivation are more or less evident at
different seasons, and require more or less care in their examination,
according to the circumstances under which
they are manifested.
If a plowed field show, over a part or the whole of its
surface, a constant appearance of dampness, indicating that,
as fast as water is dried out from its upper parts, more
is forced up from below, so that after a rain it is much
longer than other lands in assuming the light color of dry
earth, it unmistakably needs draining.
A pit, sunk to the depth of three or four feet in the
earth, may collect water at its bottom, shortly after a
rain;—this is a sure sign of the need of draining.
All tests of the condition of land as to water,—such as
trial pits, etc.,—should be made, when practicable, during
the wet spring weather, or at a time when the springs and
brooks are running full. If there be much water in the
soil, even at such times, it needs draining.
If the water of heavy rains stands for some time on the
surface, or if water collects in the furrow while plowing,
draining is necessary to bring the land to its full fertility.
Other indications may be observed in dry weather;—wide
cracks in the soil are caused by the drying of clays, which,
by previous soaking, have been pasted together; the curling
of corn often indicates that in its early growth it has
been prevented, by a wet subsoil, from sending down its
roots below the reach of the sun's heat, where it would find,
even in the dryest weather, sufficient moisture for a healthy
growth; any severe effect of drought, except on poor
sands and gravels, may be presumed to result from the
same cause; and a certain wiryness of grass, together with
a mossy or mouldy appearance of the ground, also indicate
excessive moisture during some period of growth. The
effects of drought are, of course, sometimes manifested on
soils which do not require draining,—such as those poor
gravels, which, from sheer poverty, do not enable plants
to form vigorous and penetrating roots; but any soil of
ordinary richness, which contains a fair amount of clay,
will withstand even a severe drought, without great injury
to its crop, if it is thoroughly drained, and is kept loose at
its surface.
Poor crops are, when the cultivation of the soil is reasonably
good, caused either by inherent poverty of the
land, or by too great moisture during the season of early
growth. Which of these causes has operated in a particular
case may be easily known. Manure will correct the difficulty
in the former case, but in the latter there is no real remedy
short of such a system of drainage as will thoroughly relieve
the soil of its surplus water.
The Sources of the Water in the soil are various.
Either it falls directly upon the land as rain; rises into it
from underlying springs; or reaches it through, or over,
adjacent land.
The rain water belongs to the field on which it falls, and
it would be an advantage if it could all be made to pass
down through the first three or four feet of the soil, and be
removed from below. Every drop of it is freighted with
fertilizing matters washed out from the air, and in its descent
through the ground, these are given up for the use
of plants; and it performs other important work among
the vegetable and mineral parts of the soil.
The spring water does not belong to the field,—not a
drop of it,—and it ought not to be allowed to show itself
within the reach of the roots of ordinary plants. It has
fallen on other land, and, presumably, has there done its
appointed work, and ought not to be allowed to convert
our soil into a mere outlet passage for its removal.
The ooze water,—that which soaks out from adjoining
land,—is subject to all the objections which hold against
spring water, and should be rigidly excluded.
But the surface water which comes over the surface of
higher ground in the vicinity, should be allowed every
opportunity, which is consistent with good husbandry, to
work its slow course over our soil,—not to run in such
streams as will cut away the surface, nor in such quantities
as to make the ground inconveniently wet, but to spread
itself in beneficent irrigation, and to deposit the fertilizing
matters which it contains, then to descend through a well-drained
subsoil, to a free outlet.
From whatever source the water comes, it cannot remain
stagnant in any soil without permanent injury to its fertility.
The Objection to too much Water in the Soil will
be understood from the following explanation of the process
of germination, (sprouting,) and growth. Other grave
reasons why it is injurious will be treated in their proper
order.
The first growth of the embryo plant, (in the seed,) is
merely a change of form and position of the material which
the seed itself contains. It requires none of the elements
of the soil, and would, under the same conditions, take place
as well in moist saw-dust as in the richest mold. The
conditions required are, the exclusion of light; a certain
degree of heat; and the presence of atmospheric air, and
moisture. Any material which, without entirely excluding
the air, will shade the seed from the light, yield
the necessary amount of moisture, and allow the accumulation
of the requisite heat, will favor the chemical
changes which, under these circumstances, take place in the
living seed. In proportion as the heat is reduced by the
chilling effect of evaporation, and as atmospheric air is excluded,
will the germination of the seed be retarded; and,
in case of complete saturation for a long time, absolute
decay will ensue, and the germ will die.
The accompanying illustrations, (Figures 1, 2 and 3,) from
the "Minutes of Information" on Drainage, submitted by
the General Board of Health to the British Parliament in
1852, represent the different conditions of the soil as to
moisture, and the effect of these conditions on the germination
of seeds. The figures are thus explained by Dr.
Madden, from whose lecture they are taken:
"Soil, examined mechanically, is found to consist entirely
of particles of all shapes and sizes, from stones and pebbles
down to the finest powder; and, on account of their
extreme irregularity of shape, they cannot lie so close to
one another as to prevent there being passages between
them, owing to which circumstance soil in the mass is
always more or less porous. If, however, we proceed to
examine one of the smallest particles of which soil is
made up, we shall find that even this is not always solid,
but is much more frequently porous, like soil in the mass.
A considerable proportion of this finely-divided part of
soil, the impalpable matter, as it is generally called, is
found, by the aid of the microscope, to consist of broken
down vegetable tissue, so that when a small portion of
the finest dust from a garden or field is placed under the
microscope, we have exhibited to us particles of every
variety of shape and structure, of which a certain part is
evidently of vegetable origin.
Fig. 1 - A DRY SOIL.
Illustration: Fig. 1 - A DRY SOIL.
"In these figures I have given a very rude representation
of these particles; and I must beg you particularly to
remember that they are not meant to represent by any
means accurately what the microscope exhibits, but are
only designed to serve as a plan by which to illustrate
the mechanical properties of the soil. On referring to
Fig. 1, we perceive that there are two distinct classes of
pores,—first, the large ones, which exist between the particles
of soil, and second, the very minute ones, which
occur in the particles themselves; and you will at the
same time notice that,
whereas all the larger
pores,—those between the
particles of soil,—communicate
most freely with
each other, so that they
form canals, the small
pores, however freely they
may communicate with
one another in the interior
of the particle in which
they occur, have no direct
connection with the pores of the surrounding particles.
Let us now, therefore, trace the effect of this arrangement.
In Fig. 1 we perceive that
these canals and pores are
all empty, the soil being
perfectly dry; and the
canals communicating freely
at the surface with the
surrounding atmosphere,
the whole will of course
be filled with air. If in
this condition a seed be
placed in the soil, at a,
you at once perceive that
it is freely supplied with air, but there is no moisture;
therefore, when soil is perfectly dry, a seed cannot grow.
Fig. 2 - A WET SOIL.
Illustration: Fig. 2 - A WET SOIL.
"Let us turn our attention now to Fig. 2. Here we
perceive that both the pores and canals are no longer
represented white, but black, this color being used to indicate
water; in this instance, therefore, water has taken
the place of air, or, in other words, the soil is very wet.
If we observe our seed a now, we find it abundantly
supplied with water, but no air. Here again, therefore,
germination cannot take place. It may be well to state
here that this can never occur exactly in nature, because,
water having the power of dissolving air to a certain
extent, the seed a in Fig. 2 is, in fact, supplied with a
certain amount of this necessary substance; and, owing
to this, germination does take place, although by no
means under such advantageous circumstances as it would
were the soil in a better condition.
Fig. 3 - A DRAINED SOIL.
Illustration: Fig. 3 - A DRAINED SOIL.
"We pass on now to Fig. 3. Here we find a different
state of matters. The canals are open and freely supplied
with air, while the pores are filled with water; and,
consequently, you perceive
that, while the seed a has
quite enough of air from
the canals, it can never be
without moisture, as every
particle of soil which
touches it is well supplied
with this necessary ingredient.
This, then, is
the proper condition of soil
for germination, and in
fact for every period of the
plant's development; and this condition occurs when the
soil is moist, but not wet,—that is to say, when it has the
color and appearance of being well watered, but when it
is still capable of being crumbled to pieces by the hands,
without any of its particles adhering together in the
familiar form of mud."
As plants grow under the same conditions, as to soil,
that are necessary for the germination of seeds, the foregoing
explanation of the relation of water to the particles
of the soil is perfectly applicable to the whole period of
vegetable growth. The soil, to the entire depth occupied
by roots, which, with most cultivated plants is, in drained
land, from two to four feet, or even more, should be maintained,
as nearly as possible, in the condition represented
in Fig. 3,—that is, the particles of soil should hold water
by attraction, (absorption,) and the spaces between the
particles should be filled with air. Soils which require
drainage are not in this condition. When they are not
saturated with water, they are generally dried into lumps
and clods, which are almost as impenetrable by roots as so
many stones. The moisture which these clods contain is
not available to plants, and their surfaces are liable to be
dried by the too free circulation of air among the wide
fissures between them. It is also worthy of incidental remark,
that the cracking of heavy soils, shrinking by
drought, is attended by the tearing asunder of the smaller
roots which may have penetrated them.
The Injurious Effects of Standing Water in the Subsoil
may be best explained in connection with the description
of a soil which needs under-draining. It would
be tedious, and superfluous, to attempt to detail the various
geological formations and conditions which make the soil
unprofitably wet, and render draining necessary. Nor,—as
this work is intended as a hand-book for practical use,—is
it deemed advisable to introduce the geological charts and
sections, which are so often employed to illustrate the
various sources of under-ground water; interesting as
they are to students of the theories of agriculture, and
important as the study is, their consideration here would
consume space, which it is desired to devote only to the
reasons for, and the practice of, thorough-draining.
To one writing in advocacy of improvements, of any
kind, there is always a temptation to throw a tub to the
popular whale, and to suggest some make-shift, by which
a certain advantage may be obtained at half-price. It is
proposed in this essay to resist that temptation, and to adhere
to the rule that "whatever is worth doing, is worth
doing well," in the belief that this rule applies in no
other department of industry with more force than in the
draining of land, whether for agricultural or for sanitary
improvement. Therefore, it will not be recommended that
draining be ever confined to the wettest lands only; that, in
the pursuance of a penny-wisdom, drains be constructed
with stones, or brush, or boards; that the antiquated
horse-shoe tiles be used, because they cost less money; or
that it will, in any case, be economical to make only such
drains as are necessary to remove the water of large springs.
The doctrine herein advanced is, that, so far as draining
is applied at all, it should be done in the most thorough
and complete manner, and that it is better that, in
commencing this improvement, a single field be really well
drained, than that the whole farm be half drained.
Of course, there are some farms which suffer from too
much water, which are not worth draining at present;
many more which, at the present price of frontier lands,
are only worth relieving of the water which stands on the
surface; and not a few on which the quantity of stone to
be removed suggests the propriety of making wide ditches,
in which to hide them, (using the ditches, incidentally, as
drains). A hand-book of draining is not needed by the
owners of these farms; their operations are simple, and they
require no especial instruction for their performance. This
work is addressed especially to those who occupy lands of
sufficient value, from their proximity to market, to make
it cheaper to cultivate well, than to buy more land for the
sake of getting a larger return from poor cultivation.
Wherever Indian corn is worth fifty cents a bushel, on the
farm, it will pay to thoroughly drain every acre of land
which needs draining. If, from want of capital, this cannot
be done at once, it is best to first drain a portion of the
farm, doing the work thoroughly well, and to apply the
return from the improvement to its extension over other
portions afterward.
In pursuance of the foregoing declaration of principles,
it is left to the sagacity of the individual operator, to decide
when the full effect desired can be obtained, on particular
lands, without applying the regular system of depth
and distance, which has been found sufficient for the worst
cases. The directions of this book will be confined to the
treatment of land which demands thorough work.
Such land is that which, at some time during the period
of vegetation, contains stagnant water, at least in its sub-soil,
within the reach of the roots of ordinary crops; in
which there is not a free outlet at the bottom for all the
water which it receives from the heavens, from adjoining
land, or from springs; and which is more or less in the condition
of standing in a great, water-tight box, with openings
to let water in, but with no means for its escape, except
by evaporation at the surface; or, having larger inlets
than outlets, and being at times "water-logged," at
least in its lower parts. The subsoil, to a great extent, consists
of clay or other compact material, which is not impervious,
in the sense in which india-rubber is impervious,
(else it could not have become wet,) but which is sufficiently
so to prevent the free escape of water. The surface
soil is of a lighter or more open character, in consequence
of the cultivation which it has received, or of the decayed
vegetable matter and the roots which it contains.
In such land the subsoil is wet,—almost constantly wet,—and
the falling rain, finding only the surface soil in a condition
to receive it, soon fills this, and often more than fills it,
and stands on the surface. After the rain, come wind and
sun, to dry off the standing water,—to dry out the free water
in the surface soil, and to drink up the water of the
subsoil, which is slowly drawn from below. If no spring,
or ooze, keep up the supply, and if no more rain fall,
the subsoil may be dried to a considerable depth, cracking
and gaping open, in wide fissures, as the clay loses its
water of absorption, and shrinks. After the surface soil has
become sufficiently dry, the land may be plowed, seeds will
germinate, and plants will grow. If there be not too much
rain during the season, nor too little, the crop may be a
fair one,—if the land be rich, a very good one. It is not impossible,
nor even very uncommon, for such soils to produce
largely, but they are always precarious. To the labor
and expense of cultivation, which fairly earn a secure return,
there is added the anxiety of chance; success is greatly
dependent on the weather, and the weather may be bad:
Heavy rains, after planting, may cause the seed to rot in the
ground, or to germinate imperfectly; heavy rains during
early growth may give an unnatural development, or a
feeble character to the plants; later in the season, the want
of sufficient rain may cause the crop to be parched by
drought, for its roots, disliking the clammy subsoil below,
will have extended within only a few inches of the surface,
and are subject, almost, to the direct action of the sun's
heat; in harvest time, bad weather may delay the gathering
until the crop is greatly injured, and fall and spring
work must often be put off because of wet.
The above is no fancy sketch. Every farmer who cultivates
a retentive soil will confess, that all of these inconveniences
conspire, in the same season, to lessen his returns,
with very damaging frequency; and nothing is more common
than for him to qualify his calculations with the proviso,
"if I have a good season." He prepares his ground,
plants his seed, cultivates the crop, "does his best,"—thinks
he does his best, that is,—and trusts to Providence
to send him good weather. Such farming is attended with
too much uncertainty,—with too much luck,—to be satisfactory;
yet, so long as the soil remains in its undrained
condition, the element of luck will continue to play a very
important part in its cultivation, and bad luck will often
play sad havoc with the year's accounts.
Land of this character is usually kept in grass, as long
as it will bring paying crops, and is, not unfrequently, only
available for pasture; but, both for hay and for pasture, it
is still subject to the drawback of the uncertainty of the
seasons, and in the best seasons it produces far less than it
might if well drained.
The effect of this condition of the soil on the health of animals
living on it, and on the health of persons living near
it, is extremely unfavorable; the discussion of this branch
of the question, however, is postponed to a later chapter.
Thus far, there have been considered only the effects of
the undue moisture in the soil. The manner in which these
effects are produced will be examined, in connection with
the manner in which draining overcomes them,—reducing
to the lowest possible proportion, that uncertainty which
always attaches to human enterprises, and which is falsely
supposed to belong especially to the cultivation of the soil.
Why is it that the farmer believes, why should any
one believe, in these modern days, when the advancement
of science has so simplified the industrial processes
of the world, and thrown its light into so many corners,
that the word "mystery" is hardly to be applied to any
operation of nature, save to that which depends on the
always mysterious Principle of Life,—when the effect of any
combination of physical circumstances may be foretold,
with almost unerring certainty,—why should we believe
that the success of farming must, after all, depend
mainly on chance? That an intelligent man should submit
the success of his own patient efforts to the operation of
"luck;" that he should deliberately bet his capital, his toil,
and his experience on having a good season, or a bad one,—this
is not the least of the remaining mysteries. Some
chance there must be in all things,—more in farming
than in mechanics, no doubt; but it should be made to
take the smallest possible place in our calculations, by a
careful avoidance of every condition which may place our
crops at the mercy of that most uncertain of all things—the
weather; and especially should this be the case, when
the very means for lessening the element of chance in our
calculations are the best means for increasing our crops, even
in the most favorable weather.
CHAPTER II. - HOW DRAINS ACT, AND HOW THEY AFFECT THE SOIL
For reasons which will appear, in the course of this work,
the only sort of drain to which reference is here made is that
which consists of a conduit of burned clay, (tile,) placed at a
considerable depth in the subsoil, and enclosed in a compacted
bed of the stiffest earth which can conveniently be found.
Stone-drains, brush-drains, sod-drains, mole-plow tracks,
and the various other devices for forming a conduit for the
conveying away of the soakage-water of the land, are not
without the support of such arguments as are based on the
expediency of make-shifts, and are, perhaps, in rare cases,
advisable to be used; but, for the purposes of permanent
improvement, they are neither so good nor so economical as
tile-drains. The arguments of this book have reference to
the latter, (as the most perfect of all drains thus far invented,)
though they will apply, in a modified degree, to all
underground conduits, so long as they remain free from obstructions.
Concerning stone-drains, attention may properly
be called to the fact that, (contrary to the general
opinion of farmers,) they are very much more expensive
than tile-drains. So great is the cost of cutting the ditches
to the much greater size required for stone than for tiles, of
handling the stones, of placing them properly in the ditches,
and of covering them, after they are laid, with a suitable barrier
to the rattling down of loose earth among them, that,
as a mere question of first cost, it is far cheaper to buy
tiles than to use stones, although these may lie on the surface
of the field, and only require to be placed in the
trenches. In addition to this, the great liability of stone-drains
to become obstructed in a few years, and the certainty
that tile-drains will, practically, last forever, are
conclusive arguments in favor of the use of the latter.
If the land is stony, it must be cleared; this is a proposition
by itself, but if the sole object is to make drains, the
best material should be used, and this material is not stone.
A well laid tile-drain has the following essential characteristics:—1.
It has a free outlet for the discharge of all
water which may run through it. 2. It has openings, at its
joints, sufficient for the admission of all the water which
may rise to the level of its floor. 3. Its floor is laid on a
well regulated line of descent, so that its current may
maintain a flow of uniform, or, at least, never decreasing
rapidity, throughout its entire length.
Land which requires draining, is that which, at some
time during the year, (either from an accumulation of the
rains which fall upon it, from the lateral flow, or soakage,
from adjoining land, from springs which open within it, or
from a combination of two or all of these sources,) becomes
filled with water, that does not readily find a natural
outlet, but remains until removed by evaporation. Every
considerable addition to its water wells up, and soaks its
very surface; and that which is added after it is already
brim full, must flow off over the surface, or lie in puddles
upon it. Evaporation is a slow process, and it becomes
more and more slow as the level of the water recedes from
the surface, and is sheltered, by the overlying earth, from the
action of sun and wind. Therefore, at least during the
periods of spring and fall preparation of the land, during
the early growth of plants, and often even in midsummer,
the water-table,—the top of the water of saturation,—is
within a few inches of the surface, preventing the natural
descent of roots, and, by reason of the small space to receive
fresh rains, causing an interruption of work for some
days after each storm.
If such land is properly furnished with tile-drains, (having
a clear and sufficient outfall, offering sufficient means
of entrance to the water which reaches them, and carrying
it, by a uniform or increasing descent, to the outlet,)
its water will be removed to nearly, or quite, the level
of the floor of the drains, and its water-table will be at the
distance of some feet from the surface, leaving the spaces
between the particles of all of the soil above it filled with
air instead of water. The water below the drains stands
at a level, like any other water that is dammed up. Rain
water falling on the soil will descend by its own weight to
this level, and the water will rise into the drains, as it
would flow over a dam, until the proper level is again attained.
Spring water entering from below, and water oozing
from the adjoining land, will be removed in like manner,
and the usual condition of the soil, above the water-table,
will be that represented in Fig. 3, the condition which
is best adapted to the growth of useful plants.
In the heaviest storms, some water will flow over the
surface of even the dryest beach-sand; but, in a well
drained soil the water of ordinary rains will be at once
absorbed, will slowly descend toward the water-table, and
will be removed by the drains, so rapidly, even in heavy
clays, as to leave the ground fit for cultivation, and in a
condition for steady growth, within a short time after the
rain ceases. It has been estimated that a drained soil has
room between its particles for about one quarter of its bulk
of water;—that is, four inches of drained soil contains free
space enough to receive a rain-fall one inch in depth, and, by
the same token, four feet of drained soil can receive twelve
inches of rain,—-more than is known to have ever fallen in
twenty-four hours, since the deluge, and more than one
quarter of the annual rain-fall in the United States.
As was stated in the previous chapter, the water which
reaches the soil may be considered under two heads:
1st—That which reaches its surface, whether directly by
rain, or by the surface flow of adjoining land.
2d—That which reaches it below the surface, by springs
and by soakage from the lower portions of adjoining land.
The first of these is beneficial, because it contains fresh
air, carbonic acid, ammonia, nitric acid, and heat, obtained
from the atmosphere; and the flowage water contains, in
addition, some of the finer or more soluble parts of the
land over which it has passed. The second, is only so much
dead water, which has already given up, to other soil, all
that ours could absorb from it, and its effect is chilling and
hurtful. This being the case, the only interest we can have
in it, is to keep it down from the surface, and remove it as
rapidly as possible.
The water of the first sort, on the other hand, should be
arrested by every device within our reach. If the land is
steep, the furrows in plowing should be run horizontally
along the hill, to prevent the escape of the water over the
surface, and to allow it to descend readily into the ground.
Steep grass lands may have frequent, small, horizontal
ditches for the same purpose. If the soil is at all heavy, it
should not, when wet, be trampled by animals, lest it be
puddled, and thus made less absorptive. If in cultivation,
the surface should be kept loose and open, ready to receive
all of the rain and irrigation water that reaches it.
In descending through the soil, this water, in summer,
gives up heat which it received from the air and from the
heated surface of the ground, and thus raises the temperature
of the lower soil. The fertilizing matters which it has
obtained from the air,—carbonic acid, ammonia and nitric
acid,—are extracted from it, and held for the use of growing
plants. Its fresh air, and the air which follows the descent
of the water-table, carries oxygen to the organic and
mineral parts of the soil, and hastens the rust and decay
by which these are prepared for the uses of vegetation.
The water itself supplies, by means of their power of absorption,
the moisture which is needed by the particles of
the soil; and, having performed its work, it goes down to
the level of the water below, and, swelling the tide above
the brink of the dam, sets the drains running, until it is
all removed. In its descent through the ground, this water
clears the passages through which it flows, leaving a
better channel for the water of future rains, so that, in
time, the heaviest clays, which will drain but imperfectly
during the first one or two years, will pass water, to a
depth of four or five feet, almost as readily as the lighter
loams.
Now, imagine the drains to be closed up, leaving no outlet
for the water, save at the surface. This amounts to a
raising of the dam to that height, and additions to the water
will bring the water-table even with the top of the soil.
No provision being made for the removal of spring and
soakage water, this causes serious inconvenience, and
even the rain-fall, finding no room in the soil for its
reception, can only lie upon, or flow over, the surface,—not
yielding to the soil the fertilizing matters which it contains,
but, on the contrary, washing away some of its finer
and looser parts. The particles of the soil, instead of being
furnished, by absorption, with a healthful amount of
moisture, are made unduly wet; and the spaces between
them, being filled with water, no air can enter, whereby the
chemical processes by which the inert minerals, and the
roots and manure, in the soil are prepared for the use of
vegetation, are greatly retarded.
Instead of carrying the heat of the air, and of the surface
of the ground, to the subsoil, the rain only adds so
much to the amount of water to be evaporated, and increases,
by so much, the chilling effect of evaporation.
Instead of opening the spaces of the soil for the more
free passage of water and air, as is done by descending
water, that which ascends by evaporation at the surface
brings up soluble matters, which it leaves at the point
where it becomes a vapor, forming a crust that prevents
the free entrance of air at those times when the soil is dry
enough to afford it space for circulation.
Instead of crumbling to the fine condition of a loam, as
it does, when well drained, by the descent of water
through it, heavy clay soil, being rapidly dried by evaporation,
shrinks into hard masses, separated by wide cracks.
In short, in wet seasons, on such land, the crops will be
greatly lessened, or entirely destroyed, and in dry seasons,
cultivation will always be much more laborious, more hurried,
and less complete, than if it were well drained.
The foregoing general statements, concerning the action
of water in drained, and in undrained land, and of the effects
of its removal, by gravitation, and by evaporation, are based
on facts which have been developed by long practice, and
on a rational application of well know principles of science.
These facts and principles are worthy of examination, and
they are set forth below, somewhat at length, especially
with reference to Absorption and Filtration; Evaporation;
Temperature; Drought; Porosity or Mellowness;
and Chemical Action.
Absorption and Filtration.—The process of under-draining
is a process of absorption and filtration, as distinguished
from surface-flow and evaporation. The completeness
with which the latter are prevented, and the
former promoted, is the measure of the completeness of the
improvement. If water lie on the surface of the ground
until evaporated, or if it flow off over the surface, it will
do harm; if it soak away through the soil, it will do good.
The rapidity and ease with which it is absorbed, and, therefore,
the extent to which under-draining is successful, depend
on the physical condition of the soil, and on the
manner in which its texture is affected by the drying action
of sun and wind, and by the downward passage of water
through it.
In drying, all soils, except pure sands, shrink, and occupy
less space than when they are saturated with water. They
shrink more or less, according to their composition, as will
be seen by the following table of results obtained in the
experiments of Schuebler:
1,000 Parts ofWill Contract Parts.1,000 Parts ofWill Contract Parts.Strong Limey Soil50.Pure Clay183.Heavy Loam60.Peat200.Brick Maker's Clay85.
Professor Johnson estimates that peat and heavy clay
shrink one-fifth of their bulk.
If soil be dried suddenly, from a condition of extreme
wetness, it will be divided into large masses, or clods, separated
by wide cracks. A subsequent wetting of the clods,
which is not sufficient to expand it to its former condition,
will not entirely obliterate the cracks, and the next drying
will be followed by new fissures within the clods themselves;
and a frequent repetition of this process will make
the network of fissures finer and finer, until the whole mass
of the soil is divided to a pulverulent condition. This is the
process which follows the complete draining of such lands
as contain large proportions of clay or of peat. It is retarded,
in proportion to the amount of the free water in the
soil which is evaporated from the surface, and in proportion
to the trampling of the ground, when very wet. It is
greatly facilitated by frost, and especially by deep frost.
The fissures which are formed by this process are, in time,
occupied by the roots of plants, which remain and decay,
when the crop has been removed, and which prevent the
soil from ever again closing on itself so completely as before
their penetration; and each season's crop adds new roots
to make the separation more complete and more universal;
but it is only after the water of saturation, which occupies
the lower soil for so large a part of the year, has been removed
by draining, that roots can penetrate to any considerable
depth, and, in fact, the cracking of undrained
soils, in drying, never extends beyond the separation into
large masses, because each heavy rain, by saturating the
soil and expanding it to its full capacity, entirely obliterates
the cracks and forms a solid mass, in which the operation
has to be commenced anew with the next drying.
Mr. Gisborne, in his capital essay on "Agricultural
Drainage," which appeared in the Quarterly Review, No.
CLXXI, says: "We really thought that no one was so ignorant
as not to be aware that clay lands always shrink
and crack with drought, and the stiffer the clay the
greater the shrinking, as brickmakers well know. In the
great drought, 36 years ago, we saw in a very retentive
soil in the Vale of Belvoir, cracks which it was not
very pleasant to ride among. This very summer, on land
which, with reference to this very subject, the owner
stated to be impervious, we put a walking stick three
feet into a sun-crack, without finding a bottom, and the
whole surface was what Mr. Parkes, not inappropriately,
calls a network of cracks. When heavy rain comes
upon a soil in this state, of course the cracks fill, the clay
imbibes the water, expands, and the cracks are abolished.
But if there are four or five feet parallel drains in the
land, the water passes at once into them and is carried
off. In fact, when heavy rain falls upon clay lands in this
cracked state, it passes off too quickly, without adequate
filtration. Into the fissures of the undrained soil the roots
only penetrate to be perished by the cold and wet of the
succeeding winter; but in the drained soil the roots follow
the threads of vegetable mold which have been
washed into the cracks, and get an abiding tenure. Earth
worms follow either the roots or the mold. Permanent
schisms are established in the clay, and its whole character
is changed. An old farmer in a midland county began
with 20-inch drains across the hill, and, without ever
reading a word, or, we believe, conversing with any one
on the subject, poked his way, step by step, to four or
five feet drains, in the line of steepest descent. Showing
us his drains this spring, he said: 'They do better year
by year; the water gets a habit of coming to them '—a very
correct statement of fact, though not a very philosophical
explanation."
Alderman Mechi, of Tiptree Hall, says: "Filtration
may be too sudden, as is well enough shown by our hot
sands and gravels; but I apprehend no one will ever
fear rendering strong clays too porous and manageable.
The object of draining is to impart to such soils the
mellowness and dark color of self drained, rich and friable
soil. That perfect drainage and cultivation will do
this, is a well known fact. I know it in the case of my
own garden. How it does so I am not chemist enough
to explain in detail; but it is evident the effect is produced
by the fibers of the growing crop intersecting
every particle of the soil, which they never could do before
draining; these, with their excretions, decompose on
removal of the crop, and are acted on by the alternating
air and water, which also decompose and change, in a
degree, the inorganic substances of the soil. Thereby
drained land, which was, before, impervious to air and
water, and consequently unavailable to air and roots,
to worms, or to vegetable or animal life, becomes, by
drainage, populated by both, and is a great chemical
laboratory, as our own atmosphere is subject to all the
changes produced by animated nature."
Experience proves that the descent of water through the
soil renders it more porous, so that it is easier for the
water falling afterward to pass down to the drains, but no
very satisfactory reason for this has been presented, beyond
that which is connected with the cracking of the soil. The
fact is well stated in the following extract from a letter to
the Country Gentleman:
"A simple experiment will convince any farmer that the
best means of permanently deepening and mellowing the
soil is by thorough drainage, to afford a ready exit for all
surplus moisture. Let him take in spring, while wet, a
quantity of his hardest soil,—such as it is almost impossible
to plow in summer,—such as presents a baked and
brick-like character under the influence of drought,—and
place it in a box or barrel, open at the bottom, and frequently
during the season let him saturate it with water.
He will find it gradually becoming more and more porous
and friable,—holding water less and less perfectly as the
experiment proceeds, and in the end it will attain a state
best suited to the growth of plants from its deep and
mellow character."
It is equally a fact that the ascent of water in the soil,
together with its evaporation at the surface, has the effect
of making the soil impervious to rains, and of covering the
land with a crust of hard, dry earth, which forms a barrier
to the free entrance of air. So far as the formation of crust
is concerned, it is doubtless due to the fact that the water
in the soil holds in solution certain mineral matters, which
it deposits at the point of evaporation, the collection of
these finely divided matters serving to completely fill the
spaces between the particles of soil at the surface,—pasting
them together, as it were. How far below the surface this
direct action extends, cannot be definitely determined; but
the process being carried on for successive years, accumulating
a quantity of these fine particles, each season, they
are, by cultivation, and by the action of heavy showers
falling at a time when the soil is more or less dry, distributed
through a certain depth, and ordinarily, in all
probability, are most largely deposited at the top of the
subsoil. It is found in practice that the first foot in depth
of retentive soils is more retentive than that which lies
below. If this opinion as to the cause of this greater imperviousness
is correct, it will be readily seen how water,
descending to the drains, by carrying these soluble and
finer parts downward and distributing them more equally
through the whole, should render the soil more porous.
Another cause of the retention of water by the surface
soil, often a very serious one, is the puddling which
clayey lands undergo by working them, or feeding cattle
upon them, when they are wet. This is always injurious.
By draining, land is made fit for working much earlier in
the spring, and is sooner ready for pasturing after a rain,
but, no matter how thoroughly the draining has been done,
if there is much clay in the soil, the effect of the improvement
will be destroyed by plowing or trampling, while
very wet; this impervious condition will be removed in
time, of course, but while it lasts, it places us as completely
at the mercy of the weather as we were before a
ditch was dug.
In connection with the use of the word impervious, it
should be understood that it is not used in its strict sense,
for no substance which can be wetted by water is really
impervious and the most retentive soil will become wet.
Gisborne states the case clearly when he says: "Is your
subsoil moister after the rains of mid-winter, than it is
after the drought of mid-summer? If it is, it will drain."
The proportion of the rain-fall which will filtrate
through the soil to the level of the drains, varies with the
composition of the soil, and with the effect that the
draining has had upon them.
In a very loose, gravelly, or sandy soil, which has a perfect
outlet for water below, all but the heaviest falls of
rain will sink at once, while on a heavy clay, no matter
how well it is drained, the process of filtration will be
much more slow, and if the land be steeply inclined, some
of the water of ordinarily heavy rains must flow off over
the surface, unless, by horizontal plowing, or catch drains
on the surface, its flow be retarded until it has time to
enter the soil.
The power of drained soils to hold water, by absorption,
is very great. A cubic foot of very dry soil, of favorable
character, has been estimated to absorb within its particles,—holding
no free water, or water of drainage,—about one-half
its bulk of water; if this is true, the amount required
to moisten a dry soil, four feet deep, giving no excess to be
drained away, would amount to a rain fall of from 20 to 30
inches in depth. If we consider, in addition to this, the
amount of water drained away, we shall see that the soil
has sufficient capacity for the reception of all the rain water
that falls upon it.
In connection with the question of absorption and filtration,
it is interesting to investigate the movements of
water in the ground. The natural tendency of water, in the
soil as well as out of it, is to descend perpendicularly
toward the center of the earth. If it meet a flat layer of
gravel lying upon clay, and having a free outlet, it will
follow the course of the gravel,—laterally,—and find the
outlet; if it meet water which is dammed up in the soil,
and which has an outlet at a certain elevation, as at the
floor of a drain, it will raise the general level of the water,
and force it out through the drain; if it meet water which
has no outlet, it will raise its level until the soil is filled, or
until it accumulates sufficient pressure, (head,) to force its
way through the adjoining lands, or until it finds an outlet
at the surface.
The first two cases named represent the condition which
it is desirable to obtain, by either natural or artificial
drainage; the third case is the only one which makes
drainage necessary. It is a fixed rule that water, descending
in the soil, will find the lowest outlet to which there
exists a channel through which it can flow, and that if, after
heavy rains, it rise too near the surface of the ground, the
proper remedy is to tap it at a lower level, and thus remove
the water table to the proper distance from the surface.
This subject will be more fully treated in a future
chapter, in considering the question of the depth, and the
intervals, at which drains should be placed.
Evaporation.—By evaporation is meant the process by
which a liquid assumes the form of a gas or vapor, or
"dries up." Water, exposed to the air, is constantly undergoing
this change. It is changed from the liquid form, and
becomes a vapor in the air. Water in the form of vapor
occupies nearly 2000 times the space that it filled as a
liquid. As the vapor at the time of its formation is of the
same temperature with the water, and, from its highly expanded
condition, requires a great amount of heat to maintain
it as vapor, it follows that a given quantity of water
contains, in the vapory form, many times as much heat as
in the liquid form. This heat is taken from surrounding
substances,—from the ground and from the air,—which are
thereby made much cooler. For instance, if a shower
moisten the ground, on a hot summer day, the drying up
of the water will cool both the ground and the air. If we
place a wet cloth on the head, and hasten the evaporation
of the water by fanning, we cool the head; if we wrap
a wet napkin around a pitcher of water, and place it in a
current of air, the water in the pitcher is made cooler,
by giving up its heat to the evaporating water of the
napkin; when we sprinkle water on the floor of a room,
its evaporation cools the air of the room.
So great is the effect of evaporation, on the temperature
of the soil, that Dr. Madden found that the soil of a
drained field, in which most of the water was removed
from below, was 6-1/2° Far. warmer than a similar soil undrained,
from which the water had to be removed by
evaporation. This difference of 6-1/2° is equal to a difference
of elevation of 1,950 feet.
It has been found, by experiments made in England, that
the average evaporation of water from wet soils is equal
to a depth of two inches per month, from May to August,
inclusive; in America it must be very much greater than
this in the summer months, but this is surely enough for
the purposes of illustration, as two inches of water, over an
acre of land, would weigh about two hundred tons. The
amount of heat required to evaporate this is immense, and
a very large part of it is taken from the soil, which, thereby,
becomes cooler, and less favorable for a rapid growth. It
is usual to speak of heavy, wet lands as being "cold," and
it is now seen why they are so.
If none of the water which falls on a field is removed by
drainage, (natural or artificial,) and if none runs off from
the surface, the whole rain-fall of a year must be removed
by evaporation, and the cooling of the soil will be proportionately
great. The more completely we withdraw this
water from the surface, and carry it off in underground
drains, the more do we reduce the amount to be removed
by evaporation. In land which is well drained, the amount
evaporated, even in summer, will not be sufficient to so
lower the temperature of the soil as to retard the growth
of plants; the small amount dried out of the particles of
the soil, (water of absorption,) will only keep it from being
raised to too great a heat by the mid-summer sun.
An idea of the amount of heat lost to the soil, in the
evaporation of water, may be formed from the fact that to
evaporate, by artificial heat, the amount of water contained
in a rain-fall of two inches on an acre, (200 tons,) would
require over 20 tons of coal. Of course a considerable—probably
by far the larger,—part of the heat taken up in
the process of evaporation is furnished by the air; but the
amount abstracted from the soil is great, and is in direct
proportion to the amount of water removed by this process;
hence, the more we remove by draining, the more
heat we retain in the ground.
The season of growth is lengthened by draining, because,
by avoiding the cooling effects of evaporation, germination
is more rapid, and the young plant grows steadily
from the start, instead of struggling against the retarding
influence of a cold soil.
Temperature.—The temperature of the soil has great
effect on the germination of seeds, the growth of plants,
and the ripening of the crops.
Gisborne says: "The evaporation of 1 lb. of water
lowers the temperature of 100 lbs. of soil 10°,—that is
to say, that, if to 100 lbs. of soil, holding all the water
it can by attraction, but containing no water of drainage,
is added 1 lb. of water which it has no means of
discharging, except by evaporation, it will, by the time
that it has so discharged it, be 60° colder than it would
have been, if it had the power of discharging this 1 lb.
by filtration; or, more practically, that, if rain, entering
in the proportion of 1 lb. to 100 lbs. into a retentive
soil, which is saturated with water of attraction, is discharged
by evaporation, it lowers the temperature of
that soil 10°. If the soil has the means of discharging
that 1 lb. of water by filtration, no effect is produced beyond
what is due to the relative temperatures of the
rain and of the soil."
It has been established by experiment that four times
as much heat is required to evaporate a certain quantity
of water, as to raise the same quantity from the freezing
to the boiling point.
It is, probably, in consequence of this cooling effect
of evaporation, that wet lands are warmest when shaded,
because, under this condition, evaporation is less active.
Such lands, in cloudy weather, form an unnatural growth,
such as results in the "lodging" of grain crops, from the
deficient strength of the straw which this growth produces.
In hot weather, the temperature of the lower soil is, of
course, much lower than that of the air, and lower than
that of the water of warm rains. If the soil is saturated
with water, the water will, of course, be of an even temperature
with the soil in which it lies, but if this be drained
off, warm air will enter from above, and give its heat to
the soil, while each rain, as it falls, will also carry its heat
with it. Furthermore, the surface of the ground is sometimes
excessively heated by the summer sun, and the heat
thus contained is carried down to the lower soil by the
descending water of rains, which thus cool the surface and
warm the subsoil, both beneficial.
Mr. Josiah Parkes, one of the leading draining engineers
of England, has made some experiments to test the
extent to which draining affects the temperature of the
soil. The results of his observations are thus stated by
Gisborne: "Mr. Parkes gives the temperature on a
Lancashire flat moss, but they only commence 7 inches
below the surface, and do not extend to mid-summer.
At that period of the year the temperature, at 7 inches,
never exceeded 66°, and was generally from 10° to 15°
below the temperature of the air in the shade, at 4 feet
above the earth. Mr. Parkes' experiments were made
simultaneously, on a drained, and on an undrained portion
of the moss; and the result was, that, on a mean
of 35 observations, the drained soil at 7 inches in depth
was 10° warmer than the undrained, at the same depth.
The undrained soil never exceeded 47°, whereas, after a
thunder storm, the drained reached 66° at 7 inches, and
48° at 31 inches. Such were the effects, at an early
period of the year, on a black bog. They suggest some
idea of what they were, when, in July or August, thunder
rain at 60° or 70° falls on a surface heated to 130°, and
carries down with it, into the greedy fissures of the earth,
its augmented temperature. These advantages, porous
soils possess by nature, and retentive ones only acquire
them by drainage."
Drained land, being more open to atmospheric circulation,
and having lost the water which prevented the temperature
of its lower portions from being so readily
affected by the temperature of the air as it is when dry,
will freeze to a greater depth in winter and thaw out earlier
in the spring. The deep freezing has the effect to
greatly pulverize the lower soil, thus better fitting it for
the support of vegetation; and the earlier thawing makes
it earlier ready for spring work.
Drought.—At first thought, it is not unnatural to suppose
that draining will increase the ill effect of too dry
seasons, by removing water which might keep the soil
moist. Experience has proven, however, that the result
is exactly the opposite of this. Lands which suffer most
from drought are most benefited by draining,—more in
their greater ability to withstand drought than in any
other particular.
The reasons for this action of draining become obvious,
when its effects on the character of the soil are examined.
There is always the same amount of water in, and about,
the surface of the earth. In winter there is more in the
soil than in summer, while in summer, that which has
been dried out of the soil exists in the atmosphere in the
form of a vapor. It is held in the vapory form by heat,
which may be regarded as braces to keep it distended.
When vapor comes in contact with substances sufficiently
colder than itself, it gives up its heat,—thus losing its
braces,—contracts, becomes liquid water, and is deposited
as dew.
Many instances of this operation are familiar to all.
For instance, a cold pitcher in the summer robs the
vapor in the air of its heat, and causes it to be deposited
on its own surface,—of course the water comes from the
atmosphere, not through the wall of the pitcher; if we
breathe on a knife blade, it condenses, in the same manner,
the moisture of the breath, and becomes covered with a
film of-water; stone-houses are damp in summer, because
the inner surface of their walls, being cooler than the
atmosphere, causes its moisture to be deposited in the
manner described;
By leaving a space between the wall and the plastering, this moisture
is prevented from being an annoyance, and if the inclosed space is not
open from top to bottom, so as to allow a circulation of air, but little
vapor will come in contact with the wall, and but an inconsiderable
amount will be deposited.
nearly every night, in summer, the
cold earth receives moisture from the atmosphere in the
form of dew; a single large head of cabbage, which at
night is very cold, often condenses water to the amount of
a gill or more.
The same operation takes place in the soil. When the
air is allowed to circulate among its lower and cooler,
(because more shaded,) particles, they receive moisture by
the same process of condensation. Therefore, when, by
the aid of under-drains, the lower soil becomes sufficiently
loose and open, to allow a circulation of air, the deposit of
atmospheric moisture will keep it supplied with water, at
a point easily accessible to the roots of plants.
If we wish to satisfy ourselves that this is practically
correct, we have only to prepare two boxes of finely pulverized
soil,—one three or four inches deep,—and the other
fifteen or twenty inches deep, and place them in the sun, at
midday, in summer. The thinner soil will soon be completely
dried, while the deeper one, though it may have
been previously dried in an oven, will soon accumulate a
large amount of water on those particles which, being
lower and better sheltered from the sun's heat than the
particles of the thin soil, are made cooler.
We have seen that even the most retentive soil,—the
stiffest clay,—is made porous by the repeated passage of
water from the surface to the level of the drains, and that
the ability to admit air, which plowing gives it, is maintained
for a much longer time than if it were usually saturated
with water which has no other means of escape
than by evaporation at the surface. The power of dry
soils to absorb moisture from the air may be seen by an
examination of the following table of results obtained by
Schuebler, who exposed 1,000 grains of dried soil of the
various kinds named to the action of the air:
Kind of Soil.Amount of Water Absorbed in 24 Hours.Common Soil22 grains.Loamy Clay26 grains.Garden Soil45 grains.Brickmakers' Clay30 grains.
The effect of draining in overcoming drought, by admitting
atmospheric vapor will, of course, be very much increased
if the land be thoroughly loosened by cultivation,
and especially if the surface be kept in an open and mellow
condition.
In addition to the moisture received from the air, as
above described, water is, in a porous soil, drawn up from
the wetter subsoil below, by the same attractive force
which acts to wet the whole of a sponge of which only the
lower part touches the water;—as a hard, dry, compact
sponge will absorb water much less readily than one
which is loose and open, so the hard clods, into which undrained
clay is dried, drink up water much less freely than
they will do after draining shall have made them more
friable.
The source of this underground moisture is the "water
table,"—the level of the soil below the influence of the
drains,—and this should be so placed that, while its water
will easily rise to a point occupied by the feeding roots of
the crop, it should yield as little as possible for evaporation
at the surface.
Another source of moisture, in summer, is the deposit of
dew on the surface of the ground. The amount of this is
very difficult to determine, and accurate American experiments
on the subject are wanting. Of course the amount
of dew is greater here than in England, where Dr. Dalton,
a skillful examiner of atmospheric phenomena, estimates
the annual deposit of dew to equal a depth of five inches,
or about one-fifth of the rain-fall. Water thus deposited
on the soil is absorbed more or less completely, in proportion
to the porosity of the ground.
The extent to which plants will be affected by drought
depends, other things being equal, on the depth to which
they send their roots. If these lie near the surface, they
will be parched by the heat of the sun. If they strike
deeply into the damper subsoil, the sun will have less effect
on the source from which they obtain their moisture.
Nothing tends so much to deep rooting, as the thorough
draining of the soil. If the free water be withdrawn to
a considerable distance from the surface, plants,—even
without the valuable aid of deep and subsoil plowing,—will
send their roots to great depths. Writers on this
subject cite many instances in which the roots of ordinary
crops "not mere hairs, but strong fibres, as large as pack-thread,"
sink to the depth of 4, 6, and in some instances
12 or 14 feet. Certain it is that, in a healthy, well aerated
soil, any of the plants ordinarily cultivated in the garden
or field will send their roots far below the parched surface
soil; but if the subsoil is wet, cold, and soggy, at the
time when the young crop is laying out its plan of future
action, it will perforce accommodate its roots to the
limited space which the comparatively dry surface soil
affords.
It is well known among those who attend the meetings
of the Farmers' Club of the American Institute, in New
York, that the farm of Professor Mapes, near Newark, N.J.,
which maintains its wonderful fertility, year after year,
without reference to wet or dry weather, has been rendered
almost absolutely indifferent to the severest drought,
by a course of cultivation which has been rendered possible
only by under-draining. The lawns of the Central
Park, which are a marvel of freshness, when the lands about
the Park are burned brown, owe their vigor mainly to the
complete drainage of the soil. What is true of these thoroughly
cultivated lands, it is practicable to attain on all
soils, which, from their compact condition, are now almost
denuded of vegetation in dry seasons.
Porosity or Mellowness.—An open and mellow condition
of the soil is always favorable for the growth of
plants. They require heat, fresh air and moisture, to enable
them to take up the materials on which they live, and
by which they grow. We have seen that the heat of retentive
soils is almost directly proportionate to the completeness
with which their free water is removed by underground
draining, and that, by reason of the increased
facility with which air and water circulate within them,
their heat is more evenly distributed among all those parts
of the soil which are occupied by roots. The word moisture,
in this connection, is used in contradistinction to wetness,
and implies a condition of freshness and dampness,—not
at all of saturation. In a saturated, a soaking-wet soil,
every space between the particles is filled with water to
the entire exclusion of the atmosphere, and in such a soil
only aquatic plants will grow. In a dry soil, on the other
hand, when the earth is contracted into clods and baked,
almost as in an oven,—one of the most important conditions
for growth being wanting,—nothing can thrive, save
those plants which ask of the earth only an anchoring
place, and seek their nourishment from the air. Both air
plants and water plants have their wisely assigned places
in the economy of nature, and nature provides them with
ample space for growth. Agriculture, however, is directed
to the production of a class of plants very different from
either of these,—to those which can only grow to their
greatest perfection in a soil combining, not one or two
only, but all three of the conditions named above. While
they require heat, they cannot dispense with the moisture
which too great heat removes; while they require moisture,
they cannot abide the entire exclusion of air, nor the
dissipation of heat which too much water causes. The
interior part of the pellets of a well pulverized soil should
contain all the water that they can hold by their own absorptive
power, just as the finer walls of a damp sponge
hold it; while the spaces between these pellets, like the
pores of the sponge, should be filled with air.
In such a soil, roots can extend in any direction, and to
considerable depth, without being parched with thirst, or
drowned in stagnant water, and, other things being equal,
plants will grow to their greatest possible size, and all
their tissues will be of the best possible texture. On
rich land, which is maintained in this condition of porosity
and mellowness, agriculture will produce its best results,
and will encounter the fewest possible chances of failure.
Of course, there are not many such soils to be found, and
such absolute balance between warmth and moisture in the
soil cannot be maintained at all times, and under all circumstances,
but the more nearly it is maintained, the more
nearly perfect will be the results of cultivation.
Chemical Action in the Soil.—Plants receive certain of
their constituents from the soil, through their roots. The
raw materials from which these constituents are obtained
are the minerals of the soil, the manures which are artificially
applied, water, and certain substances which are
taken from the air by the absorptive action of the soil,
or are brought to it by rains, or by water flowing over the
surface from other land.
The mineral matters, which constitute the ashes of
plants, when burned, are not mere accidental impurities
which happen to be carried into their roots in solution in
the water which supplies the sap, although they vary in
character and proportion with each change in the mineral
composition of the soil. It is proven by chemical
analysis, that the composition of the ashes, not only of
different species of plants, but of different parts of the
same plant, have distinctive characters,—some being rich
in phosphates, and others in silex; some in potash, and others
in lime,—and that these characters are in a measure
the same, in the same plants or parts of plants, without
especial reference to the soil on which they grow. The
minerals which form the ashes of plants, constitute but a
very small part of the soil, and they are very sparsely distributed
throughout the mass; existing in the interior of
its particles, as well as upon their surfaces. As roots cannot
penetrate to the interior of pebbles and compact particles
of earth, in search of the food which they require,
but can only take that which is exposed on their surfaces,
and, as the oxydizing effect of atmospheric air is useful in
preparing the crude minerals for assimilation, as well as in
decomposing the particles in which they are bound up,—a
process which is allied to the rusting of metals,—the more
freely atmospheric air is allowed, or induced, to circulate
among the inner portions of the soil, the more readily are
its fertilizing parts made available for the use of roots.
By no other process, is air made to enter so deeply, nor to
circulate so readily in the soil, as by under-draining, and
the deep cultivation which under-draining facilitates.
Of the manures which are applied to the land, those of
a mineral character are affected by draining, in the same
manner as the minerals which are native to the soil;
while organic, or animal and vegetable, manures, (especially
when applied, as is usual, in an incompletely fermented
condition,) absolutely require fresh supplies of
atmospheric air, to continue the decomposition which
alone can prepare them for their proper effect on vegetation.
If kept saturated with water, so that the air is excluded,
animal manures lie nearly inert, and vegetable matters
decompose but incompletely,—yielding acids which are injurious
to vegetation, and which would not be formed in
the presence of a sufficient supply of air. An instance is
cited by H. Wauer where sheep dung was preserved, for
five years, by excessive moisture, which kept it from the
air. If the soil be saturated with water in the spring, and,
in summer, (by the compacting of its surface, which is
caused by evaporation,) be closed against the entrance of
air, manures will be but slowly decomposed, and will act
but imperfectly on the crop,—if, on the other hand, a
complete system of drainage be adopted, manures, (and
the roots which have been left in the ground by the previous
crop,) will be readily decomposed, and will exercise
their full influence on the soil, and on the plants growing
in it.
Again, manures are more or less effective, in proportion
as they are more or less thoroughly mixed with the soil.
In an undrained, retentive soil, it is not often possible to
attain that perfect tilth, which is best suited for a proper
admixture, and which is easily given after thorough
draining.
The soil must be regarded as the laboratory in which
nature, during the season of growth, is carrying on those
hidden, but indispensable chemical separations, combinations,
and re-combinations, by which the earth is made to
bear its fruits, and to sustain its myriad life. The chief
demand of this laboratory is for free ventilation. The
raw material for the work is at hand,—as well in the wet
soil as in the dry; but the door is sealed, the damper is
closed, and only a stray whiff of air can, now and then,
gain entrance,—only enough to commence an analysis, or a
combination, which is choked off when half complete,
leaving food for sorrel, but making none for grass. We
must throw open door and window, draw away the water
in which all is immersed, let in the air, with its all destroying,
and, therefore, all re-creating oxygen, and leave
the forces of nature's beneficent chemistry free play,
deep down in the ground. Then may we hope for the
full benefit of the fertilizing matters which our good soil
contains, and for the full effect of the manures which we
add.
With our land thoroughly improved, as has been described,
we may carry on the operations of farming with
as much certainty of success, and with as great immunity
from the ill effects of unfavorable weather, as can be expected
in any business, whose results depend on such a
variety of circumstances. We shall have substituted certainty
for chance, as far as it is in our power to do so, and
shall have made farming an art, rather than a venture.
CHAPTER III. - HOW TO GO TO WORK TO LAY OUT A SYSTEM OF DRAINS.
How to lay out the drains; where to place the outlet;
where to locate the main collecting lines; how to arrange
the laterals which are to take the water from the soil and
deliver it at the mains; how deep to go; at what intervals;
what fall to give; and what sizes of tile to use,—these
are all questions of great importance to one who is
about to drain land.
On the proper adjustment of these points, depend the
economy and effectiveness of the work. Time and attention
given to them, before commencing actual operations, will
prevent waste and avoid failure. Any person of ordinary
intelligence may qualify himself to lay out under-drains
and to superintend their construction,—but the knowledge
which is required does not come by nature. Those
who have not the time for the necessary study and practice
to make a plan for draining their land, will find it
economical to employ an engineer for the purpose. In
this era of railroad building, there is hardly a county in
America which has not a practical surveyor, who may
easily qualify himself, by a study of the principles and
directions herein set forth, to lay out an economical plan
for draining any ordinary agricultural land, to stake the
lines, and to determine the grade of the drains, and the
sizes of tile with which they should be furnished.
On this subject Mr. Gisborne says: "If we should give
a stimulus to amateur draining, we shall do a great deal
of harm. We wish we could publish a list of the moneys
which have been squandered in the last 40 years in amateur
draining, either ineffectually or with very imperfect efficiency.
Our own name would be inscribed in the list for a
very respectable sum. Every thoughtless squire supposes
that, with the aid of his ignorant bailiff, he can effect a perfect
drainage of his estate; but there is a worse man behind
the squire and the bailiff,—the draining conjuror. * * * * * *
These fellows never go direct about their
work. If they attack a spring, they try to circumvent
it by some circuitous route. They never can learn that
nature shows you the weakest point, and that you should
assist her,—that hit him straight in the eye is as good a
maxim in draining as in pugilism. * * * * * *
If you wish to drain, we recommend you to take advice.
We have disposed of the quack, but there is a faculty,
not numerous but extending, and whose extension appears
to us to be indispensable to the satisfactory
progress of improvements by draining,—a faculty of
draining engineers. If we wanted a profession for a lad
who showed any congenial talent, we would bring him
up to be a draining engineer." He then proceeds to
speak of his own experience in the matter, and shows that,
after more than thirty years of intelligent practice, he
employed Mr. Josiah Parkes to lay out and superintend
his work, and thus effected a saving, (after paying all professional
charges,) of fully twelve per cent. on the cost of
the draining, which was, at the same time, better executed
than any that he had previously done.
It is probable that, in nearly all amateur draining, the
unnecessary frequency of the lateral drains; the extravagant
size of the pipes used; and the number of useless
angles which result from an unskillful arrangement, would
amount to an expense equal to ten times the cost of the
proper superintendence, to say nothing of the imperfect
manner in which the work is executed. A common impression
seems to prevail, that if a 2-inch pipe is good, a
3-inch pipe must be better, and that, generally, if draining
is worth doing at all, it is worth overdoing; while
the great importance of having perfectly fitting connections
is not readily perceived. The general result is, that
most of the tile-draining in this country has been too expensive
for economy, and too careless for lasting efficiency.
It is proposed to give, in this chapter, as complete a
description of the preliminary engineering of draining as
can be concentrated within a few pages, and a hope is entertained,
that it will, at least, convey an idea of the importance
of giving a full measure of thought and ingenuity
to the maturing of the plan, before the execution of
the work is commenced. "Farming upon paper" has
never been held in high repute, but draining upon paper
is less a subject for objection. With a good map of the
farm, showing the comparative levels of outlet, hill, dale,
and plain, and the sizes and boundaries of the different
in closures, a profitable winter may be passed,—with pencil
and rubber,—in deciding on a plan which will do the
required work with the least possible length of drain, and
which will require the least possible extra deep cutting;
and in so arranging the main drains as to require the
smallest possible amount of the larger and more costly
pipes; or, if only a part of the farm is to be drained during
the coming season, in so arranging the work that it will
dovetail nicely with future operations. A mistake in actual
work is costly, and, (being buried under the ground,) is
not easily detected, while errors in drawing upon paper
are always obvious, and are remedied without cost.
For the purpose of illustrating the various processes
connected with the laying out of a system of drainage,
the mode of operating on a field of ten acres will be detailed,
in connection with a series of diagrams showing
the progress of the work.
A Map of the Land is first made, from a careful survey.
This should be plotted to a scale of 50 or 100 feet
to the inch,
The maps in this book are, for convenience, drawn to a scale of 160
feet to the inch.
and should exhibit the location of obstacles
which may interfere with the regularity of the
drains,—such as large trees, rocks, etc., and the existing
swamps, water courses, springs, and open drains. (Fig. 4.)
The next step is to locate the contour lines of the land,
or the lines of equal elevation,—also called the horizontal
lines,—which serve to show the shape of the surface. To do
this, stake off the field into squares of 50 feet, by first running
a base line through the center of the greatest length of the
field, marking it with stakes at intervals of 50 feet, then stake
other lines, also at intervals of 50 feet, perpendicular to the
base line, and then note the position of the stakes on the
maps; next, by the aid of an engineer's level and staff, ascertain
the height, (above an imaginary plain below the lowest
part of the field,) of the surface of the ground at each stake,
and note this elevation at its proper point on the map. This
gives a plot like Fig. 5. The best instrument with which to
take these levels, is the ordinary telescope-level used by railroad
engineers, shown in Fig. 6, which has a telescope with
cross hairs intersecting each other in the center of the line
of sight, and a "bubble" placed exactly parallel to this
line. The instrument, fixed on a tripod, and so adjusted
that it will turn to any point of the compass without disturbing
the position of the bubble, will, (as will its "line of
sight,") revolve in a perfectly horizontal plane. It is so
placed as to command a view of a considerable stretch of
the field, and its height above the imaginary plane is
measured, an attendant places next to one of the stakes
a levelling rod, (Fig. 7,) which is divided into feet and
fractions of a foot, and is furnished with a movable target,
so painted that its center point may be plainly seen.
The attendant raises and lowers the target, until it comes
exactly in the line of sight; its height on the rod denotes
the height of the instrument above the level of the
ground at that stake, and, as the height of the instrument
above the imaginary plane has been reached, by subtracting
one elevation from the other, the operator determines
the height of the ground at that stake above the imaginary
plane,—which is called the "datum line."
Fig. 4 - MAP OF LAND, WITH SWAMPS, ROCKS, SPRINGS AND TREES. INTENDED TO REPRESENT A FIELD OF TEN ACRES BEFORE DRAINING.
Illustration: Fig. 4 - MAP OF LAND, WITH SWAMPS, ROCKS, SPRINGS AND TREES. INTENDED TO REPRESENT A FIELD OF TEN ACRES BEFORE DRAINING.
Fig. 5 - MAP WITH 50-FOOT SQUARES, AND CONTOUR LINES.
Illustration: Fig. 5 - MAP WITH 50-FOOT SQUARES, AND CONTOUR LINES.
Fig. 6 - LEVELLING INSTRUMENT.
The instrument from which this cut was taken, (as also Fig. 7) was
made by Messrs. Blunt & Nichols, Water st., N. Y.
Illustration: Fig. 5 - MAP WITH 50-FOOT SQUARES, AND CONTOUR LINES.
Fig. 7 - LEVELLING ROD.
Illustration: Fig. 7 - LEVELLING ROD.
The next operation is to trace, on the plan, lines following
the same level, wherever the land is of the proper
height for its surface to meet them. For the purpose of
illustrating this operation, lines at intervals of elevation of
one foot are traced on the plan in Fig. 8. And these lines
show, with sufficient accuracy for practical purposes, the
elevation and rate of inclination of all parts
of the field,—where it is level or nearly so,
where its rise is rapid, and where slight. As
the land rises one foot from the position of
one line to the position of the line next above
it, where the distance from one line to the
next is great, the land is more nearly level,
and when it is short the inclination is steeper.
For instance, in the southwest corner of the
plan, the land is nearly level to the 2-foot
line; it rises slowly to the center of the field,
and to the eastern side about one-fourth of
the distance from the southern boundary,
while an elevation coming down between
these two valleys, and others skirting the
west side of the former one and the southern
side of the latter, are indicated by the greater
nearness of the lines. The points at which
the contour lines cross the section lines are
found in the following manner: On the
second line from the west side of the field we
find the elevations of the 4th, 5th and 6th
stakes from the southern boundary to be 1.9,
3.3, and 5.1. The contour lines, representing
points of elevation of 2, 3, 4, and 5 feet above
the datum line, will cross the 50-foot lines at
their intersections, only where these intersections
are marked in even feet. When they are
marked with fractions of a foot, the lines must
be made to cross at points between two intersections,—nearer
to one or the other, according
to their elevations,—thus between 1.9
and 3.3, the 2-foot and 3-foot contour lines
must cross. The total difference of elevation, between the
two points is 3.3—1.9=1.4; 10/14 of the space must be given
to the even foot between the lines, and the 2-foot line should
be 1/14 of the space above the point 1.9;—the 3-foot line
will then come 3/14 below the point 3.3. In the same manner,
the line from 3.3 to 5.1 is divided into 18 parts, of
which 10 go to the space between the 4. and 5. lines, 7 are
between 3.3 and the 4-foot line, and 1 between the 5-foot
line and 5.1.
Fig. 8 - MAP WITH CONTOUR LINES.
Illustration: Fig. 8 - MAP WITH CONTOUR LINES.
With these maps, made from observations taken in the
field, we are prepared to lay down, on paper, our system
of drainage, and to mature a plan which shall do the necessary
work with the least expenditure of labor and material.
The more thoroughly this plan is considered, the
more economical and effective will be the work. Having
already obtained the needed information, and having it all
before us, we can determine exactly the location and size of
each drain, and arrange, before hand, for a rapid and satisfactory
execution of the work. The only thing that may
interfere with the perfect application of the plan, is the
presence of masses of underground rock, within the depth
to which the drains are to be laid.
The slight deviations caused by carrying the drains around large
stones, which are found in cutting the ditches, do not affect the general
arrangement of the lines.
Where these are supposed
to exist, soundings should be made, by driving a
3/4-inch pointed iron rod to the rock, or to a depth of five
feet where the rock falls away. By this means, measuring
the distance from the soundings to the ranges of the
stakes, we can denote on the map the shape and depth of
sunken rocks. The shaded spot on the east side of the
map, (Fig. 8,) indicates a rock three feet from the surface,
which will be assumed to have been explored by sounding.
In most cases, it will be sufficient to have contour lines
taken only at intervals of two feet, and, owing to the
smallness of the scale on which these maps are engraved,
and to avoid complication in the finished plan, where so
much else must be shown, each alternate line is omitted.
Of course, where drains are at once staked out on the
land, by a practiced engineer, no contour lines are taken,
as by the aid of the level and rod for the flatter portions,
and by the eye alone for the steeper slopes, he will be able
at once to strike the proper locations and directions; but
for one of less experience, who desires to thoroughly
mature his plan before commencing, they are indispensable;
and their introduction here will enable the novice to
understand, more clearly than would otherwise be possible,
the principles on which the plan should be made.
For preliminary examinations, and for all purposes in
which great accuracy is not required, the little instrument
shown in Fig. 9,—"Wells' Clinometer,"—is exceedingly
simple and convenient. Its essential parts are a flat side,
or base, on which it stands, and a hollow disk just half
filled with some heavy liquid. The glass face of the disk is
surrounded by a graduated scale that marks the angle at
which the surface of the liquid stands, with reference to
the flat base. The line 0.——0. being parallel to the
base, when the liquid stands on that line, the flat side is
horizontal; the line 90.——90. being perpendicular to
the base, when the liquid stands on that line, the flat side
is perpendicular or plumb. In like manner, the intervening
angles are marked, and, by the aid of the following tables,
the instrument indicates the rate of fall per hundred feet
of horizontal measurement, and per hundred feet measured
upon the sloping line.
The low price at which this instrument is sold, $1.50, places it within
the reach of all.
Table No. 1 shows the rise of the slope for 100 feet of
the horizontal measurement. Example: If the horizontal
distance is 100 feet, and the slope is at an angle of 15°,
the rise will be 17-633/1000 feet.
Table No. 2 shows the rise of the slope for 100 feet of
its own length. If the sloping line, (at an angle of 15°,)
is 100 feet long, it rises 25.882 feet.
With the maps before him, showing the surface features
of the field, and the position of the under-ground rock,
the drainer will have to consider the following points:
1. Where, and at what depth, shall the outlet be
placed?
2. What shall be the location, the length and the depth
of the main drain?
3. What subsidiary mains,—or collecting drains,—shall
connect the minor valleys with the main?
4. What may best be done to collect the water of large
springs and carry it away?
5. What provision is necessary to collect the water
that flows over the surface of out-cropping rock, or
along springy lines on side hills or under banks?
6. What should be the depth, the distance apart, the
direction, and the rate of fall, of the lateral drains?
7. What kind and sizes of tile should be used to form
the conduits?
8. What provision should be made to prevent the obstruction
of the drains, by an accumulation of silt or sand,
which may enter the tiles immediately after they are laid,
and before the earth becomes compacted about them; and
from the entrance of vermin?
1. The outlet should be at the lowest point of the boundary,
unless, (for some especial reason which does not
exist in the case under consideration, nor in any usual
case,) it is necessary to seek some other than the natural
outfall; and it should be deep enough to take the water of
the main drain, and laid on a sufficient inclination for a free
flow of the water. It should, where sufficient fall can be
obtained without too great cost, deliver this water over a
step of at least a few inches in height, so that the action of
the drain may be seen, and so that it may not be liable to
be clogged by the accumulation of silt, (or mud,) in the
open ditch into which it flows.
2. The main drain should, usually, be run as nearly in
the lowest part of the principal valley as is consistent with
tolerable straightness. It is better to cut across the point
of a hill, to the extent of increasing the depth for a few
rods, than to go a long distance out of the direct course
to keep in the valley, both because of the cost of
the large tile used in the main, and of the loss of fall
occasioned by the lengthening of the line. The main should
be continued from the outlet to the point at which it is
most convenient to collect the more remote sub-mains,
which bring together the water of several sets of laterals.
As is the case in the tract under consideration, the depth
of the main is often restricted, in nearly level land, toward
the upper end of the flat which lies next to the outlet,
by the necessity for a fall and the difficulty which often
exists in securing a sufficiently low outlet. In such case,
the only rule is to make it as deep as possible. When the
fall is sufficient, it should be placed at such depth as will
allow the laterals and sub-mains which discharge into it
to enter at its top, and discharge above the level of the
water which flows through it.
Fig. 10 - STONE PIT TO CONNECT SPRING WITH DRAIN.
Illustration: Fig. 10 - STONE PIT TO CONNECT SPRING WITH DRAIN.
3. Subsidiary mains, or sub-mains, connecting with the
main drains, should be run up the minor valleys of the
land, skirting the
bases of the hills.
Where the valley is
a flat one, with rising
ground at each side,
there should be a
sub-main, to receive
the laterals from
each hill side. As a
general rule, it may
be stated, that the
collecting drain at
the foot of a slope
should be placed on
the line which is first
reached by the water
flowing directly
down over its surface, before it commences its lateral
movement down the valley; and it should, if possible, be
so arranged that it shall have a uniform descent for its
whole distance. The proper arrangement of these collecting
drains requires more skill and experience than
any other branch of the work, for on their disposition
depends, in a great measure, the economy and success of
the undertaking.
4. Where springs exist, there should be some provision
made for collecting their water in pits filled with loose
stone, gravel, brush or other rubbish, or furnished with
several lengths of tile set on end, one above the other, or
with a barrel or other vessel; and a line of tile of proper
size should be run directly
to a main, or sub-main
drain. The manner of
doing this by means of a
pit filled with stone is
shown in Fig. 10. The
collection of spring water
in a vertical tile basin is
shown in Fig. 11.
Fig. 11 - STONE AND TILE BASIN FOR SPRING WITH DRAIN.
Illustration: Fig. 11 - STONE AND TILE BASIN FOR SPRING WITH DRAIN.
5. Where a ledge of
shelving rock, of considerable
size, occurs on land
to be drained, it is best to
make some provision for
collecting, at its base, the
water flowing over its surface,
and taking it at once
into the drains, so that it
may not make the land
near it unduly wet. To
effect this, a ditch should be dug along the base of the rock,
and quite down to it, considerably deeper than the level of
the proposed drainage; and this should be filled with small
stones to that level, with a line of tile laid on top of the
stones, a uniform bottom for the tile to rest upon being
formed of cheap strips of board. The tile and stone should
then be covered with inverted sods, with wood shavings,
or with other suitable material, which will prevent the entrance
of earth, (from the covering of the drain,) to choke
them. The water, following down the surface of the rock,
will rise through the stone work and, entering the tile, will
flow off. This method may be used for springy hill sides.
6. The points previously considered relate only to the
collection of unusual quantities of water, (from springs
and from rock surfaces,) and to the removal from the land
of what is thus collected, and of that which flows from
the minor or lateral drains.
The lateral drains themselves constitute the real drainage
of the field, for, although main lines take water from
the land on each side, their action in this regard is not
usually considered, in determining either their depth or
their location, and they play an exceedingly small part in
the more simple form of drainage,—that in which a large
tract of land, of perfectly uniform slope, is drained by parallel
lines of equal length, all discharging into a single
main, running across the foot of the field. The land would
be equally well drained, if the parallel lines were continued
to an open ditch beyond its boundary,—the main tile drain
is only adopted for greater convenience and security. It
will simplify the question if, in treating the theory of lateral
drains, it be assumed that our field is of this uniform
inclination, and admits of the use of long lines of parallel
drains. In fact, it is best in practice to approximate as
nearly as possible to this arrangement, because deviations
from it, though always necessary in broken land, are
always more expensive, and present more complicated
engineering problems. If all the land to be drained had
a uniform fall, in a single direction, there would be but
little need of engineering skill, beyond that which is required
to establish the depth, fall, and distance apart, at
which the drains should be laid. It is chiefly when the
land pitches in different directions, and with varying inclination,
that only a person skilled in the arrangement of
drains, or one who will give much consideration to the
subject, can effect the greatest economy by avoiding unnecessary
complication, and secure the greatest efficiency
by adjusting the drains to the requirements of the land.
Assuming the land to have an unbroken inclination, so
as to require only parallel drains, it becomes important to
know how these parallel drains, (corresponding to the
lateral drains of an irregular system,) should be made.
The history of land draining is a history of the gradual
progress of an improvement, from the accomplishment of
a single purpose, to the accomplishment of several purposes,
and most of the instruction which modern agricultural
writers have given concerning it, has shown too
great dependence upon the teachings of their predecessors,
who considered well the single object which they sought
to attain, but who had no conception that draining was to
be so generally valuable as it has become. The effort, (probably
an unconscious one,) to make the theories of modern
thorough-draining conform to those advanced by the early
practitioners, seems to have diverted attention from some
more recently developed principles, which are of much
importance. For example, about a hundred years ago,
Joseph Elkington, of Warwickshire, discovered that, where
land is made too wet by under-ground springs, a skillful
tapping of these,—drawing off their water through suitable
conduits,—would greatly relieve the land, and for
many years the Elkington System of drainage, being a
great improvement on every thing theretofore practiced,
naturally occupied the attention of the agricultural world,
and the Board of Agriculture appointed a Mr. Johnstone
to study the process, and write a treatise on the subject.
Catch-water drains, made so as to intercept a flow of
surface water, have been in use from immemorial time, and
are described by the earliest writers. Before the advent
of the Draining Tile, covered drains were furnished with
stones, boards, brush, weeds, and various other rubbish,
and their good effect, very properly, claimed the attention
of all improvers of wet land. When the tile first made
its appearance in general practice, it was of what is called
the "horse-shoe" form, and,—imperfect though it was,—it
was better than anything that had preceded it, and was
received with high approval, wherever it became known.
The general use of all these materials for making drains
was confined to a system of partial drainage, until the
publication of a pamphlet, in 1833, by Mr. Smith, of Deanston,
who advocated the drainage of the whole field, without
reference to springs. From this plan, but with important
modifications in matters of detail, the modern system
of tile draining has grown. Many able men have
aided its progress, and have helped to disseminate a
knowledge of its processes and its effects, yet there are
few books on draining, even the most modern ones, which
do not devote much attention to Elkington's discovery;
to the various sorts of stone and brush drains; and to the
manufacture and use of horse-shoe tile;—not treating them
as matters of antiquarian interest, but repeating the instructions
for their application, and allowing the reasoning
on which their early use was based, to influence, often to a
damaging extent, their general consideration of the modern
practice of tile draining.
These processes are all of occasional use, even at this
day, but they are based on no fixed rules, and are so much
a matter of traditional knowledge, with all farmers, that
instruction concerning them is not needed. The kind of
draining which is now under consideration, has for its object
the complete removal of all of the surplus water that
reaches the soil, from whatever source, and the assimilation
of all wet soils to a somewhat uniform condition, as to
the ease with which water passes through them.
There are instances, as has been shown, where a large
spring, overflowing a considerable area, or supplying the
water of an annoying brook, ought to be directly connected
with the under-ground drainage, and its flow neatly
carried away; and, in other cases, the surface flow over
large masses of rock should be given easy entrance into
the tile; but, in all ordinary lands, whether swamps,
springy hill sides, heavy clays, or light soils lying on retentive
subsoil, all ground, in fact, which needs under-draining
at all, should be laid dry above the level to which
it is deemed best to place the drains;—not only secured
against the wetting of springs and soakage water, but
rapidly relieved of the water of heavy rains. The water
table, in short, should be lowered to the proper depth, and,
by permanent outlets at that depth, be prevented from
ever rising, for any considerable time, to a higher level.
This being accomplished, it is of no consequence to know
whence the water comes, and Elkington's system need
have no place in our calculations. As round pipes, with collars,
are far superior to the "horse-shoe" tiles, and are
equally easy to obtain, it is not necessary to consider the
manner in which these latter should be used,—only to say
that they ought not to be used at all.
The water which falls upon the surface is at once absorbed,
settles through the ground, until it reaches a
point where the soil is completely saturated, and raises the
general water level. When this level reaches the floor of
the drains, the water enters at the joints and is carried
off. That which passes down through the land lying
between the drains, bears down upon that which has already
accumulated in the soil, and forces it to seek an outlet
by rising into the drains.
Except from quite near to the drain, it is not probable that the
water in the soil runs laterally towards it.
For example, if a barrel,
standing on end, be filled with earth which is saturated
with water, and its bung be removed, the water of saturation,
(that is, all which is not held by attraction in the particles
of earth,) will be removed from so much of the
mass as lies above the bottom of the bung-hole. If a
bucket of water be now poured upon the top, it will not all
run diagonally toward the opening; it will trickle down to
the level of the water remaining in the barrel, and this level
will rise and water will run off at the bottom of the orifice.
In this manner, the water, even below the drainage level,
is changed with each addition at the surface. In a barrel
filled with coarse pebbles, the water of saturation would
maintain a nearly level surface; if the material were more
compact and retentive, a true level would be attained only
after a considerable time. Toward the end of the flow,
the water would stand highest at the points furthest distant
from the outlet. So, in the land, after a drenching
rain, the water is first removed to the full depth, near the
line of the drain, and that midway between two drains
settles much more slowly, meeting more resistance from
below, and, for a long time, will remain some inches
higher than the floor of the drain. The usual condition
of the soil, (except in very dry weather,) would be somewhat
as represented in the accompanying cut, (Fig. 12.)
Fig. 12 - LINE OF SATURATION BETWEEN DRAINS.
YY are the draings. The curved line b is the line of saturation, which has descended from a, and is approaching c.
Illustration: Fig. 12 - LINE OF SATURATION BETWEEN DRAINS.
To provide for this deviation of the line of saturation,
in practice, drains are placed deeper than would be necessary
if the water sunk at once to the level of the drain
floor, the depth of the drains being increased with the increasing
distance between them.
Theoretically, every drop of water which falls on a field
should sink straight down to the level of the drains, and
force a drop of water below that level to rise into the drain
and flow off. How exactly this is true in nature cannot
be known, and is not material. Drains made in pursuance
of this theory will be effective for any actual condition.
The depth to which the water table should be withdrawn
depends, not at all on the character of the soil,
but on the requirements of the crops which are to be
grown upon it, and these requirements are the same in all
soils,—consequently the depth should be the same in all.
What, then, shall that depth be? The usual practice
of the most experienced drainers seems to have fixed four
feet as about the proper depth, and the arguments against
anything less than this, as well as some reasons for supposing
that to be sufficient, are so clearly stated by Mr.
Gisborne that it has been deemed best to quote his own
words on the subject:
"Take a flower-pot a foot deep, filled with dry soil.
Place it in a saucer containing three inches of water.
The first effect will be, that the water will rise through
the hole in the bottom of the pot till the water which
fills the interstices between the soil is on a level with the
water in the saucer. This effect is by gravity. The
upper surface of this water is our water-table. From it
water will ascend by attraction through the whole
body of soil till moisture is apparent at the surface. Put
in your soil at 60°, a reasonable summer heat for nine
inches in depth, your water at 47°, the seven inches'
temperature of Mr. Parke's undrained bog; the attracted
water will ascend at 47°, and will diligently occupy
itself in attempting to reduce the 60° soil to its own
temperature. Moreover, no sooner will the soil hold
water of attraction, than evaporation will begin to carry
it off, and will produce the cold consequent thereon.
This evaporated water will be replaced by water of attraction
at 47°, and this double cooling process will go
on till all the water in the water-table is exhausted.
Supply water to the saucer as fast as it disappears, and
then the process will be perpetual. The system of saucer-watering
is reprobated by every intelligent gardener; it
is found by experience to chill vegetation; besides which,
scarcely any cultivated plant can dip its roots into stagnant
water with impunity. Exactly the process which
we have described in the flower-pot is constantly in
operation on an undrained retentive soil; the water-table
may not be within nine inches of the surface, but
in very many instances it is within a foot or eighteen
inches, at which level the cold surplus oozes into some
ditch or other superficial outlet. At eighteen inches,
attraction will, on the average of soils, act with considerable
power. Here, then, you have two obnoxious
principles at work, both producing cold, and the one
administering to the other. The obvious remedy is, to
destroy their united action; to break through their line
of communication. Remove your water of attraction
to such a depth that evaporation cannot act upon it, or
but feebly. What is that depth? In ascertaining this
point we are not altogether without data. No doubt
depth diminishes the power of evaporation rapidly. Still,
as water taken from a 30-inch drain is almost invariably
two or three degrees colder than water taken from four
feet, and as this latter is generally one or two degrees
colder than water from a contiguous well several feet
below, we can hardly avoid drawing the conclusion that
the cold of evaporation has considerable influence at 30
inches, a much-diminished influence at four feet, and little
or none below that depth. If the water-table is removed
to the depth of four feet, when we have allowed 18
inches of attraction, we shall still have 30 inches of defence
against evaporation; and we are inclined to believe
that any prejudicial combined action of attraction
and evaporation is thereby well guarded against. The
facts stated seem to prove that less will not suffice.
"So much on the score of temperature; but this is not
all. Do the roots of esculents wish to penetrate into
the earth—at least, to the depth of some feet? We believe
that they do. We are sure of the brassica tribe,
of grass, and clover. All our experience and observation
deny the doctrine that roots only ramble when they are
stinted of food; that six inches well manured is quite
enough, better than more. Ask the Jerseyman; he
will show you a parsnip as thick as your thigh, and as
long as your leg, and will tell you of the advantages of
14 feet of dry soil. You will hear of parsnips whose
roots descend to unsearchable depths. We will not
appeal to the Kentucky carrot, which was drawn out
by its roots at the antipodes; but Mr. Mechi's, if we
remember right, was a dozen feet or more. Three years
ago, in a midland county, a field of good land, in good
cultivation, and richly manured, produced a heavy crop
of cabbages. In November of that year we saw that
field broken into in several places, and at the depth of
four feet the soil (a tenacious marl, fully stiff enough for
brick-earth) was occupied by the roots of cabbage, not
sparingly—not mere capillæ—but fibres of the size of
small pack-thread. A farmer manures a field of four or
five inches of free soil reposing on a retentive clay, and
sows it with wheat. It comes up, and between the kernel
and the manure, it looks well for a time, but anon it
sickens. An Irish child looks well for five or six years,
but after that time potato-feeding, and filth, and hardship,
begin to tell. You ask what is amiss with the
wheat, and you are told that when its roots reach the
clay, they are poisoned. This field is then thorough-drained,
deep, at least four feet. It receives again from
the cultivator the previous treatment; the wheat comes
up well, maintains throughout a healthy aspect, and
gives a good return. What has become of the poison?
We have been told that the rain water filtered through
the soil has taken it into solution or suspension, and has
carried it off through the drains; and men who assume
to be of authority put forward this as one of the advantages
of draining. If we believed it, we could not
advocate draining. We really should not have the face
to tell our readers that water, passing through soils containing
elements prejudicial to vegetation, would carry
them off, but would leave those which are beneficial behind.
We cannot make our water so discriminating; the
general merit of water of deep drainage is, that it contains
very little. Its perfection would be that it should
contain nothing. We understand that experiments are
in progress which have ascertained that water, charged
with matters which are known to stimulate vegetation,
when filtered through four feet of retentive soil, comes
out pure. But to return to our wheat. In the first case,
it shrinks before the cold of evaporation and the cold of
water of attraction, and it sickens because its feet are
never dry; it suffers the usual maladies of cold and wet.
In the second case, the excess of cold by evaporation
is withdrawn; the cold water of attraction is removed
out of its way; the warm air from the surface, rushing
in to supply the place of the water which the drains remove,
and the warm summer rains, bearing down with
them the temperature which they have acquired from
the upper soil, carry a genial heat to its lowest roots.
Health, vigorous growth, and early maturity are the
natural consequences. * * * * * * * * *
"The practice so derided and maligned referring to
deep draining has advanced with wonderful strides.
We remember the days of 15 inches; then a step to 20; a
stride to 30; and the last (and probably final) jump to 50, a
few inches under or over. We have dabbled in them all,
generally belonging to the deep section of the day. We
have used the words 'probably final,' because the first
advances were experimental, and, though they were justified
by the results obtained, no one attempted to explain
the principle on which benefit was derived from
them. The principles on which the now prevailing
depth is founded, and which we believe to be true, go
far to show that we have attained all the advantages
which can be derived from the removal of water in
ordinary agriculture. We do not mean that, even in the
most retentive soil, water would not get into drains
which were laid somewhat deeper; but to this there
must be a not very distant limit, because pure clay, lying
below the depth at which wet and drought applied at
surface would expand and contract it, would certainly
part with its water very slowly. We find that, in coal
mines and in deep quarries, a stratum of clay of only a
few inches thick interposed between two strata of pervious
stone will form an effectual bar to the passage of
water; whereas, if it lay within a few feet of the surface,
it would, in a season of heat and drought become
as pervious as a cullender. But when we have got rid
of the cold arising from the evaporation of free water,
have given a range of several feet to the roots of grass
and cereals, and have enabled retentive land to filter
through itself all the rain which falls upon its surface,
we are not, in our present state of knowledge, aware of
any advantage which would arise from further lowering
the surface of water in agricultural land. Smith, of
Deanston, first called prominent attention to the fertilizing
effects of rain filtered through land, and to evils produced
by allowing it to flow off the surface. Any one
will see how much more effectually this benefit will be
attained, and this evil avoided, by a 4-foot than a 2-foot
drainage. The latter can only prepare two feet of soil
for the reception and retention of rain, which two feet,
being saturated, will reject more, and the surplus must
run off the surface, carrying whatever it can find with it.
A 4-foot drainage will be constantly tending to have four
feet of soil ready for the reception of rain, and it will
take much more rain to saturate four feet than two.
Moreover, as a gimlet-hole bored four feet from the surface
of a barrel filled with water will discharge much
more in a given time than a similar hole bored at the
depth of two feet, so will a 4-foot drain discharge in a
given time much more water than a drain of two feet.
One is acted on by a 4-foot, and the other by a 2-foot
pressure."
If any single fact connected with tile-drainage is established,
beyond all possible doubt, it is that in the stiffest
clay soils ever cultivated, drains four feet deep will act
effectually; the water will find its way to them, more and
more freely and completely, as the drying of successive
years, and the penetration and decay of the roots of successive
crops, modify the character of the land, and they
will eventually be practically so porous that,—so far as
the ease of drainage is concerned,—no distinction need, in
practice, be made between them and the less retentive
loams. For a few years, the line of saturation between
the drains, as shown in Fig. 11, may stand at all seasons
considerably above the level of the bottom of the tile, but
it will recede year by year, until it will be practically
level, except immediately after rains.
Mr. Josiah Parkes recommends drains to be laid
"At a minimum depth of four feet, designed with the two-fold object of
not only freeing the active soil from stagnant and injurious water, but
of converting the water falling on the surface into an agent for fertilizing;
no drainage being deemed efficient that did not both remove the
water falling on the surface, and 'keep down the subterranean water at
a depth exceeding the power of capillary attraction to elevate it near the
surface.'"
Alderman Mechi says:
"Ask nineteen farmers out of twenty, who hold strong clay land, and
they will tell you it is of no use placing deep four-foot drains in such soils—the
water cannot get in; a horse's foot-hole (without an opening
under it) will hold water like a basin; and so on. Well, five minutes
after, you tell the same farmers you propose digging a cellar, well
bricked, six or eight feet deep; what is their remark? 'Oh! it's of no
use your making an underground cellar in our soil, you can't keep the
waterout!' Was there ever such an illustration of prejudice as this?
What is a drain pipe but a small cellar full of air? Then, again, common
sense tells us, you can't keep a light fluid under a heavy one. You might
as well try to keep a cork under water, as to try and keep air under
water. 'Oh! but then our soil isn't porous.' If not, how can it hold
water so readily? I am led to these observations by the strong controversy
I am having with some Essex folks, who protest that I am mad, or
foolish, for placing 1-inch pipes, at four-foot depth, in strong clays. It
is in vain I refer to the numerous proofs of my soundness, brought forward
by Mr. Parkes, engineer to the Royal Agricultural Society, and
confirmed by Mr. Pusey. They still dispute it. It is in vain I tell them
I cannot keep the rainwater out of socketed pipes, twelve feet deep, that
convey a spring to my farm yard. Let us try and convince this large
class of doubters; for it is of national importance. Four feet of good
porous clay would afford a far better meal to some strong bean, or other
tap roots, than the usual six inches; and a saving of $4 to $5 per acre,
in drainage, is no trifle.
"The shallow, or non-drainers, assume that tenacious subsoils are impervious
or non-absorbent. This is entirely an erroneous assumption.
If soils were impervious, how could they get wet?
"I assert, and pledge my agricultural reputation for the fact, that there
are no earths or clays in this kingdom, be they ever so tenacious, that
will not readily receive, filter, and transmit rain water to drains placed
five or more feet deep.
"A neighbor of mine drained twenty inches deep in strong clay; the
ground cracked widely; the contraction destroyed the tiles, and the
rains washed the surface soils into the cracks and choked the drains. He
has since abandoned shallow draining.
"When I first began draining, I allowed myself to be overruled by
my obstinate man, Pearson, who insisted that, for top water, two feet
was a sufficient depth in a veiny soil. I allowed him to try the experiment
on two small fields; the result was, that nothing prospered; and
I am redraining those fields at one-half the cost, five and six feet deep,
at intervals of 70 and 80 feet.
"I found iron-sand rocks, strong clay, silt, iron, etc., and an enormous
quantity of water, all below the 2-foot drains. This accounted at
once for the sudden check the crops always met with in May, when they
wanted to send their roots down, but could not, without going into stagnant
water."
"There can be no doubt that it is the depth of the drain which regulates
the escape of the surface water in a given time; regard being had,
as respects extreme distances, to the nature of the soil, and a due capacity
of the pipe. The deeper the drain, even in the strongest soils, the quicker
the water escapes. This is an astounding but certain fact.
"That deep and distant drains, where a sufficient fall can be obtained,
are by far the most profitable, by affording to the roots of the plants a
greater range for food."
Of course, where the soil is underlaid by rock, less than
four feet from the surface; and where an outlet at that
depth cannot be obtained, we must, per force, drain less
deeply, but where there exists no such obstacle, drains
should be laid at a general depth of four-feet,—general,
not uniform, because the drain should have a uniform inclination,
which the surface of the land rarely has.
The Distance between the Drains.—Concerning this,
there is less unanimity of opinion among engineers, than
prevails with regard to the question of depth.
In tolerably porous soils, it is generally conceded that 40
or even 50 feet is sufficiently near for 4-foot drains, but, for
the more retentive clays, all distances from 18 feet to 50
feet are recommended, though those who belong to the
more narrow school are, as a rule, extending the limit,
as they see, in practice, the complete manner in which
drains at wider intervals perform their work. A careful
consideration of the experience of the past twenty years,
and of the arguments of writers on drainage, leads to the
belief that there are few soils, which need draining at all,
on which it will be safe to place 4-foot drains at much
wider intervals than 40 feet. In the lighter loams there
are many instances of the successful application of
Professor Mapes' rule, that "3-foot drains should be
placed 20 feet apart, and for each additional foot in
depth the distance may be doubled; for instance, 4-foot
drains should be 40 feet apart, and 5-foot drains 80 feet
apart." But, with reference to the greater distance,
(80 feet,) it is not to be recommended in stiff clays, for
any depth of drain. Where it is necessary, by reason of
insufficient fall, or of underground rock, to go only three
feet deep, the drains should be as near together as 20 feet.
At first thought, it may seem akin to quackery to recommend
a uniform depth and distance, without reference
to the character of the land to be drained; and it is unquestionably
true that an exact adaptation of the work to
the varying requirements of different soils would be beneficial,
though no system can be adopted which will make
clay drain as freely as sand. The fact is, that the adjustment
of the distances between drains is very far from
partaking of the nature of an exact science, and there is
really very little known, by any one, of the principles on
which it should be based, or of the manner in which the
bearing of those principles, in any particular case, is affected
by several circumstances which vary with each
change of soil, inclination and exposure.
In the essays on drainage which have been thus far
published, there is a vagueness in the arguments on this
branch of the subject, which betrays a want of definite
conviction in the minds of the writers; and which tends
quite as much to muddle as to enlighten the ideas of the
reader. In so far as the directions are given, whether fortified
by argument or not, they are clearly empirical, and
are usually very much qualified by considerations which
weigh with unequal force in different cases.
In laying out work, any skillful drainer will be guided,
in deciding the distance between the lines, by a judgment
which has grown out of his former experience; and which
will enable him to adapt the work, measurably, to the
requirements of the particular soil under consideration;
but he would probably find it impossible to so state the
reasons for his decision, that they would be of any general
value to others.
Probably it will be a long time before rules on this subject,
based on well sustained theory, can be laid down with distinctness,
and, in the mean time, we must be guided by
the results of practice, and must confine ourselves to a
distance which repeated trial, in various soils, has proven
to be safe for all agricultural land. In the drainage of
the Central Park, after a mature consideration of all that
had been published on the subject, and of a considerable
previous observation and experience, it was decided to
adopt a general depth of four feet, and to adhere as closely
as possible to a uniform distance of forty feet. No instance
was known of a failure to produce good results by draining
at that distance, and several cases were recalled where
drains at fifty and sixty feet had proved so inefficient that
intermediate lines became necessary. After from seven
to ten years' trial, the Central Park drainage, by its results,
has shown that,—although some of the land is of a
very retentive character,—this distance is not too great;
and it is adopted here for recommendation to all who have
no especial reason for supposing that greater distances
will be fully effective in their more porous soils.
As has been before stated, drains at that distance, (or
at any distance,) will not remove all of the water of saturation
from heavy clays so rapidly as from more porous
soil; but, although, in some cases, the drainage may be
insufficient during the first year, and not absolutely perfect
during the second and third years, the increased porosity
which drainage causes, (as the summer droughts
make fissures in the earth, as decayed roots and other
organic deposits make these fissures permanent, and as
chemical action in the aërated soil changes its character,)
will finally bring clay soils to as perfect a condition as they
are capable of attaining, and will invariably render them
excellent for cultivation.
The Direction of the Laterals should be right up and
down the slope of the land, in the line of steepest descent.
For a long time after the general adoption of thorough-draining,
there was much discussion of this subject, and
much variation in practice. The influence of the old rules
for making surface or "catch-water" drains lasted for a
long time, and there was a general tendency to make tile
drains follow the same directions. An important requirement
of these was that they should not take so steep an
inclination as to have their bottoms cut out and their
banks undermined by the rapid flow of water, and that
they should arrest and carry away the water flowing
down over the surface of hill sides. The arguments for the
line of steepest descent were, however, so clear, and
drains laid on that line were so universally successful in
practice, that it was long ago adopted by all,—save those
novices who preferred to gain their education in draining
in the expensive school of their own experience.
The more important reasons why this direction is the
best are the following: First, it is the quickest way to
get the water off. Its natural tendency is to run straight
down the hill, and nothing is gained by diverting it from
this course. Second, if the drain runs obliquely down the
hill, the water will be likely to run out at the joints of the
tile and wet the ground below it; even if it do not,
mainly, run past the drain from above into the land below,
instead of being forced into the tile. Third, a drain
lying obliquely across a hillside will not be able to draw
the water from below up the hill toward it, and the
water of nearly the whole interval will have to seek its
outlet through the drain below it. Fourth, drains running
directly down the hill will tap any porous water
bearing strata, which may crop out, at regular intervals, and
will thus prevent the spewing out of the water at the surface,
as it might do if only oblique drains ran for a long
distance just above or just below them. Very steep, and
very springy hill sides, sometimes require very frequent
drains to catch the water which has a tendency to flow to
the surface; this, however, rarely occurs.
In laying out a plan for draining land of a broken surface,
which inclines in different directions, it is impossible
to make the drains follow the line of steepest descent, and
at the same time to have them all parallel, and at uniform
distances. In all such cases a compromise must be made
between the two requirements. The more nearly the parallel
arrangement can be preserved, the less costly will
the work be, while the more nearly we follow the steepest
slope of the ground, the more efficient will each drain be.
No rule for this adjustment can be given, but a careful
study of the plan of the ground, and of its contour lines,
will aid in its determination. On all irregular ground it
requires great skill to secure the greatest efficiency consistent
with economy.
The fall required in well made tile drains is very much
less than would be supposed, by an inexperienced person,
to be necessary. Wherever practicable, without too great
cost, it is desirable to have a fall of one foot in one hundred
feet, but more than this in ordinary work is not especially
to be sought, although there is, of course, no
objection to very much greater inclination.
One half of that amount of fall, or six inches in one
hundred feet, is quite sufficient, if the execution of the
work is carefully attended to.
The least rate of fall which it is prudent to give to a
drain, in using ordinary tiles, is 2.5 in 1,000, or three inches
in one hundred feet, and even this requires very careful
work.
Some of the drains in the Central Park have a fall of only 1 in
1,000, and they work perfectly; but they are large mains, laid with an
amount of care, and with certain costly precautions, (including precisely
graded wooden floors,) which could hardly be expected in private work.
A fall of six inches in one hundred feet is recommended
whenever it can be easily obtained—not as being
more effective, but as requiring less precision, and consequently
less expense.
Kinds and Sizes of Tiles.—Agricultural drain-tiles are
made of clay similar to that which is used for brick.
When burned, they are from twelve inches to fourteen
inches long, with an interior diameter of from one to
eight inches, and with a thickness of wall, (depending on
the strength of the clay, and the size of the bore,) of from
one-quarter of an inch to more than an inch. They are
porous, to the extent of absorbing a certain amount of
water, but their porosity has nothing to do with their use
for drainage,—for this purpose they might as well be of
glass. The water enters them, not through their walls,
but at their joints, which cannot be made so tight that
they will not admit the very small amount of water that
will need to enter at each space. Gisborne says:
"If an acre of land be intersected with parallel drains
twelve yards apart, and if on that acre should fall the
very unusual quantity of one inch of rain in twelve
hours, in order that every drop of this rain may be discharged
by the drains in forty-eight hours from the commencement
of the rain—(and in a less period that quantity
neither will, not is it desirable that it should, filter
through an agricultural soil)—the interval between two
pipes will be called upon to pass two-thirds of a tablespoonful
of water per minute, and no more. Inch pipes,
lying at a small inclination, and running only half-full,
will discharge more than double this quantity of water
in forty-eight hours."
Tiles may be made of any desired form of section,—the
usual forms are the "horse-shoe," the "sole," the "double-sole,"
and the "round." The latter may be used with
collars, and they constitute the "pipes and collars," frequently
referred to in English books on drainage.
Horse-shoe tiles, Fig. 13, are condemned by all modern
engineers. Mr. Gisborne disposes of them by an argument
of some length, the quotation
of which in these pages is
probably advisable, because
they form so much better conduits
than stones, and to that extent have been so successfully
employed, that they are still largely used in this country
by "amateurs."
"We shall shock some and surprise many of our readers, when we
state confidently that, in average soils, and, still more, in those which
are inclined to be tender, horse shoe tiles form the weakest and most
failing conduit which has ever been used for a deep drain. It is so, however;
and a little thought, even if we had no experience, will tell us
that it must be so. A doggrel song, quite destitute of humor, informs
us that tiles of this sort were used in 1760 at Grandesburg Hall, in Suffolk,
by Mr. Charles Lawrence, the owner of the estate. The earliest of
which we had experience were of large area and of weak form. Constant
failures resulted from their use, and the cause was investigated; many
of the tiles were found to be choked up with clay, and many to be broken
longitudinally through the crown. For the first evil, two remedies
were adopted; a sole of slate, of wood, or of its own material, was
sometimes placed under the tile, but the more usual practice was to form
them with club-feet. To meet the case of longitudinal fracture, the tiles
were reduced in size, and very much thickened in proportion to their
area. The first of these remedies was founded on an entirely mistaken,
and the second on no conception at all of the cause of the evil to which
they were respectively applied. The idea was, that this tile, standing on
narrow feet, and pressed by the weight of the refilled soil, sank into the
floor of the drain; whereas, in fact, the floor of the drain rose into the
tile. Any one at all conversant with collieries is aware that when a strait
work (which is a small subterranean tunnel six feet high and four feet
wide or thereabouts) is driven in coal, the rising of the floor is a more
usual and far more inconvenient occurrence than the falling of the roof:
the weight of the two sides squeezes up the floor. We have seen it
formed into a very decided arch without fracture. Exactly a similar
operation takes place in the drain. No one had till recently dreamed of
forming a tile drain, the bottom of which a man was not to approach
personally within twenty inches or two feet. To no one had it then occurred
that width at the bottom of the drain was a great evil. For the
convenience of the operator the drain was formed with nearly perpendicular
sides, of a width in which he could stand and work conveniently,
shovel the bottom level with his ordinary spade, and lay the tiles by his
hand; the result was a drain with nearly perpendicular sides, and a wide
bottom. No sort of clay, particularly when softened by water standing
on it or running over it, could fail to rise under such circumstances; and
the deeper the drain the greater the pressure and the more certain the
rising. A horse-shoe tile, which may be a tolerable secure conduit in a
drain of two feet, in one of four feet becomes an almost certain failure.
As to the longitudinal fracture—not only is the tile subject to be broken
by one of those slips which are so troublesome in deep draining, and to
which the lightly-filled material, even when the drain is completed,
offers an imperfect resistance, but the constant pressure together of the
sides, even when it does not produce a fracture of the soil, catches hold
of the feet of the tile, and breaks it through the crown. Consider the
case of a drain formed in clay when dry, the conduit a horse-shoe tile.
When the clay expands with moisture, it necessarily presses on the tile
and breaks it through the crown, its weakest part.
The tile has been said, by great authorities, to be broken by contraction,
under some idea that the clay envelops the tile and presses it when it contracts.
That is nonsense. The contraction would liberate the tile. Drive a stake into
wet clay; and when the clay is dry, observe whether it clasps the stake tighter or
has released it, and you will no longer have any doubt whether expansion or contraction
breaks the tile. Shrink is a better word than contract.
When the Regent's
Park was first drained, large conduits were in fashion, and they were
made circular by placing one horse-shoe tile upon another. It would be
difficult to invent a weaker conduit. On re-drainage, innumerable instances
were found in which the upper tile was broken through the
crown, and had dropped into the lower. Next came the D form, tile and
sole in one, and much reduced in size—a great advance; and when some
skillful operator had laid this tile bottom upwards we were evidently on
the eve of pipes. For the D tile a round pipe moulded with a flat-bottomed
solid sole is now generally substituted, and is an improvement;
but is not equal to pipes and collars, nor generally cheaper than they
are."
Fig. 14 - SOLE TILE.
Illustration: Fig. 14 - SOLE TILE.
One chief objection to the Sole-tiles is, that, in the drying
which they undergo, preparatory to the burning, the
upper side is contracted, by
the more rapid drying, and
they often require to be trimmed
off with a hatchet before
they will form even tolerable joints; another is, that they
cannot be laid with collars, which form a joint so perfect
and so secure, that their use, in the smaller drains, should
be considered indispensable.
The double-sole tiles, which can be laid either side up
give a much better joint,
but they are so heavy as to
make the cost of transporation
considerably greater.
They are also open to the grave objection that they cannot
be fitted with collars.
Experience, in both public and private works in this
country, and the cumulative testimony of English and
French engineers, have demonstrated that the only tile
which it is economical to use, is the best that can be found,
and that the best,—much the best—thus far invented, is
the "pipe, or round tile, and collar,"—and these are unhesitatingly
recommended for use in all cases. Round
tiles of small sizes should not be laid without collars, as the
ability to use these constitutes their chief advantage;
holding them perfectly in place, preventing the rattling
in of loose dirt in laying, and giving twice the space for
the entrance of water at the joints. A chief advantage
of the larger sizes is, that they may be laid on any side
and thus made to fit closely. The usual sizes of these
tiles are 1-1/4 inches, 2-1/4 inches, and 3-1/2 inches in interior diameter.
Sections of the 2-1/4 inch make collars for the 1-1/4
inch, and sections of the 3-1/2 inch make collars for the 2-1/4
inch. The 3-1/2 inch size does not need collars, as it is easily
secured in place, and is only used where the flow of water
would be sufficient to wash out the slight quantity of foreign
matters that might enter at the joints.
Fig. 16 - ROUND TILE AND COLLAR, AND THE SAME AS LAID.
Illustration: Fig. 16 - ROUND TILE AND COLLAR, AND THE SAME AS LAID.
The size of tile to be used is a question of consequence.
In England, 1-inch pipes are frequently used, but 1-1/4 inch
Taking the difference of friction into consideration, 1-1/4 inch pipes
have fully twice the discharging capacity of 1-inch pipes.
are recommended for the smallest drains. Beyond this
limit, the proper size to select is, the smallest that can convey
the water which will ordinarily reach it after a heavy
rain. The smaller the pipe, the more concentrated the
flow, and, consequently, the more thoroughly obstructions
will be removed, and the occasional flushing of the pipe,
when it is taxed, for a few hours, to its utmost capacity,
will insure a thorough cleansing. No inconvenience can
result from the fact that, on rare occasions, the drain is
unable, for a short time, to discharge all the water that
reaches it, and if collars are used, or if the clay be well
packed about the pipes, there need be no fear of the tile
being displaced by the pressure. An idea of the drying
capacity of a 1-1/4-inch tile may be gained from observing
its wetting capacity, by connecting a pipe of this size with
a sufficient body of water, at its surface, and discharging,
over a level dry field, all the water which it will carry.
A 1-1/4-inch pipe will remove all the water which would fall
on an acre of land in a very heavy rain, in 24 hours,—much
less time than the water would occupy in getting to
the tile, in any soil which required draining; and tiles of
this size are ample for the draining of two acres. In like
manner, 2-1/2-inch tile will suffice for eight, and 3-1/2-inch tile
for twenty acres. The foregoing estimates are, of course,
made on the supposition that only the water which falls
on the land, (storm water,) is to be removed. For main
drains, when greater capacity is required, two tiles may be
laid, (side by side,) or in such cases the larger sizes of
sole tiles may be used, being somewhat cheaper. Where
the drains are laid 40 feet apart, about 1,000 tiles per acre
will be required, and, in estimating the quantity of tiles of
the different sizes to be purchased, reference should be
had to the following figures; the first 2,000 feet of drains
require a collecting drain of 2-1/4-inch tile, which will take
the water from 7,000 feet; and for the outlet of from
7,000 to 20,000 feet 3-1/2-inch tile may be used. Collars,
being more subject to breakage, should be ordered in somewhat
larger quantities.
Of course, such guessing at what is required, which is
especially uncertain if the surface of the ground is so
irregular as to require much deviation from regular parallel
lines, is obviated by the careful preparation of a plan
of the work, which enables us to measure, beforehand, the
length of drain requiring the different sizes of conduit,
and, as tiles are usually made one or two inches more than
a foot long, a thousand of them will lay a thousand feet,—leaving
a sufficient allowance for breakage, and for such
slight deviations of the lines as may be necessary to pass
around those stones which are too large to remove. In very
stony ground, the length of lines is often materially increased,
but in such ground, there is usually rock enough
or such accumulations of boulders in some parts, to reduce
the length of drain which it is possible to lay, at
least as much as the deviations will increase it.
It is always best to make a contract for tile considerably
in advance. The prices which are given in the advertisements
of the makers, are those at which a single thousand,—or
even a few hundred,—can be purchased, and
very considerable reductions of price may be secured on
large orders. Especially is this the case if the land is so
situated that the tile may be purchased at either one of
two tile works,—for the prices of all are extravagantly
high, and manufacturers will submit to large discounts
rather than lose an important order.
It is especially recommended, in making the contract,
to stipulate that every tile shall be hard-burned, and that
those which will not give a clear ring when struck with
a metallic instrument, shall be rejected, and the cost of
their transportation borne by the maker. The tiles used
in the Central Park drainage were all tested with the aid
of a bit of steel which had, at one end, a cutting edge.
With this instrument each tile was "sounded," and its
hardness was tested by scraping the square edge of the
bore. If it did not "ring" when struck, or if the edge
was easily cut, it was rejected. From the first cargo there
were many thrown out, but as soon as the maker saw that
they were really inspected, he sent tile of good quality
only. Care should also be taken that no over-burned
tile,—such as have been melted and warped, or very much
contracted in size by too great heat,—be smuggled into
the count.
A little practice will enable an ordinary workman to
throw out those which are imperfect, and, as a single tile
which is so underdone that it will not last, or which, from
over-burning, has too small an orifice, may destroy a long
drain, or a whole system of drains, the inspection should
be thorough.
The collars should be examined with equal care. Concerning
the use of these, Gisborne says:
"To one advantage which is derived from the use of
collars we have not yet adverted—the increased facility
with which free water existing in the soil can find entrance
into the conduit. The collar for a 1-1/2-inch pipe
has a circumference of three inches. The whole space
between the collar and the pipe on each side of the
collar is open, and affords no resistance to the entrance
of water; while at the same time the superincumbent
arch of the collar protects the junction of two
pipes from the intrusion of particles of soil. We confess
to some original misgivings that a pipe resting only
on an inch at each end, and lying hollow, might prove
weak and liable to fracture by weight pressing on it
from above; but the fear was illusory. Small particles
of soil trickle down the sides of every drain, and the
first flow of water will deposit them in the vacant space
between the two collars. The bottom, if at all soft, will
also swell up into any vacancy. Practically, if you reopen
a drain well laid with pipes and collars, you will
find them reposing in a beautiful nidus, which, when they
are carefully removed, looks exactly as if it had been
moulded for them."
The cost of collars should not be considered an objection
to their use; because, without collars it would not be
safe, (as it is difficult to make the orifices of two pieces
come exactly opposite to each other,) to use less than 2-inch
tiles, while, with collars, 1-1/4-inch are sufficient for the
same use, and, including the cost of collars, are hardly
more expensive.
It is usual, in all works on agricultural drainage, to insert
tables and formulæ for the guidance of those who
are to determine the size of tile required to discharge the
water of a certain area. The practice is not adopted here,
for the reason that all such tables are without practical
value. The smoothness and uniformity of the bore; the
rate of fall; the depth of the drain, and consequent
"head," or pressure, of the water; the different effects of
different soils in retarding the flow of the water to the
drain; the different degrees to which angles in the line of
tile affect the flow; the degree of acceleration of the flow
which is caused by greater or less additions to the stream
at the junction of branch drains; and other considerations,
arising at every step of the calculation, render it
impossible to apply delicate mathematical rules to work
which is, at best, rude and unmathematical in the extreme.
In sewerage, and the water supply of towns, such tables
are useful,—though, even in the most perfect of these
operations, engineers always make large allowances for
circumstances whose influence cannot be exactly measured,—but
in land drainage, the ordinary rules of hydraulics
have to be considered in so many different bearings,
that the computations of the books are not at all reliable.
For instance, Messrs. Shedd & Edson, of Boston, have
prepared a series of tables, based on Smeaton's experiments,
for the different sizes of tile, laid at different inclinations,
in which they state that 1-1/2-inch tile, laid with a
fall of one foot in a length of one hundred feet, will discharge
12,054.81 gallons of water in 24 hours. This is
equal to a rain-fall of over 350 inches per year on an acre
of land. As the average annual rain-fall in the United
States is about 40 inches, at least one-half of which is removed
by evaporation, it would follow, from this table,
that a 1-1/2-inch pipe, with the above named fall, would
serve for the drainage of about 17 acres. But the calculation
is again disturbed by the fact that the rain-fall is
not evenly distributed over all the days of the year,—as
much as six inches having been known to fall in a single
24 hours, (amounting to about 150,000 gallons per acre,)
and the removal of this water in a single day would require
a tile nearly five inches in diameter, laid at the
given fall, or a 3-inch tile laid at a fall of more than 7-1/2 feet
in 100 feet. But, again, so much water could not reach a
drain four feet from the surface, in so short a time, and
the time required would depend very much on the character
of the soil. Obviously, then, these tables are worthless
for our purpose. Experience has fully shown that the sizes
which are recommended below are ample for practical
purposes, and probably the areas to be drained by the
given sizes might be greatly increased, especially with reference
to such soils as do not allow water to percolate very
freely through them.
In connection with this subject, attention is called to the
following extract from the Author's Report on the Drainage,
which accompanies the "Third Annual Report of the
Board of Commissioners of the Central Park:"
"In order to test the efficiency of the system of drainage
employed on the Park, I have caused daily observations
to be taken of the amount of water discharged from the
principal drain of 'the Green,' and have compared it
with the amount of rain-fall. A portion of the record of
those observations is herewith presented.
"In the column headed 'Rain-Fall,' the amount of
water falling on one acre during the entire storm, is given
in gallons. This is computed from the record of a rain-gauge
kept on the Park.
"Under the head of 'Discharge,' the number of gallons
of water drained from one acre during 24 hours is given.
This is computed from observations taken, once a day or
oftener, and supposes the discharge during the entire
day to be the same as at the time of taking the observations.
It is, consequently, but approximately correct:
Date.Hour.Rain-fall.Discharge.Remarks.July 13.10 a.m.49,916 galls.184 galls.Ground dry. No rain since 3d inst.; 2 inches rain fell between 5.15 and 5.45 p.m. and 1-5th of an inch between 5.45 and 7.15.July 14.6-1/2 "4,968 "July 15.6-1/2 "1,325 "July 16.8 "1,104 "July 16.6 p.m.33,398 "7,764 "Ground saturated at a depth of 2 feet when this rain commenced.July 17.4,319 "July 18.9 a.m.2,208 "July 19.7 "1,325 "July 20.6-1/2 "993 "July 21.11 "662 "July 22.6-1/2 "560 "July 23.10 "1,698 "515 "This slight rain only affected the ratio of decrease.July 24.7 "442 "Nothing worthy of note until Aug. 3.Aug. 3.6-1/2 "8,490 "191 "Rain from 3 p.m. to 3.30 p.m.Aug. 4.6-1/2 "13,018 "184 "" 4.45 p.m. to 12 m.n.Aug. 5.6-1/2 "45,288 "368 "" 12 m. to 6 p.m.Aug. 5.6 p.m.8,280 "Aug. 6.9 a.m.3,954 "Aug. 7.9 "2,208 "Aug. 8.6-1/2 "828 "Aug. 9.6-1/2 "662 "Aug. 12.6-1/2 "368 "Rain 12 m. Aug. 12 to 7 a.m. Aug. 13.Aug. 13.7 "19,244 "1,104 "Aug. 14.9 "736 "Aug. 24.9 "1,132 "191 "" 3 a.m. to 4.15 a.m.Aug. 25.9 "5,547 "9,936 "" 3.30 p.m. 24th, to 7 a.m. 25th.Aug. 25.7 p.m.566 "7,740 "" 7 a.m. to 12 m.Aug. 26.6-1/2 a.m.3,974 "Aug. 26.6 p.m.2,208 "Aug. 27.6-1/2 a.m.566 "1,529 "" 4 p.m. to 6 p.m.Aug. 28.7 "993 "Sep. 11.7 "566 "165 "" 12 m.n. (10th) to 7 a.m. (11th.)Sep. 12.9 "5,094 "147 "" 12 m. (11th) to 7 a.m. (12th.)Sep. 13.9 "566 "132 "" 4 p.m. to 6 p.m.Sep. 16.9 "15,848 "110 "" 12 m. to 12 m.n.Sep. 17.7 "27,552 "1,104 "Rain continued until 12 m.Sep. 17.5 p.m.6,624 "Sep. 18.8 a.m.566 "4,968 "Sep. 19.6-1/2 "2,208 "Sep. 19.4 p.m.1,805 "Sep. 20.9 a.m.566 "1,324 "Rain f'm 12 m. (19th) to 7 a.m. (20th.)Sep. 21.9 "5,094 "945 "" 3.20 p.m. (20th) to 6 a.m. (21st.)Sep. 22.9 "10,185 "1,656 "" 12 m. (21st) to 7 a.m. (22d.)Sep. 23.9 "40,756 "7,948 "Rain continued until 7 a.m. (23d.)Sep. 24.9 "4,968 "Sep. 25.9 "566 "2,984 "Sep. 26.9 "2,484 "Oct. 1.9 "828 "There was not enough rain during this period to materially affect the flow of water.Nov. 18.9 "83 "Nov. 19.9 "1,132 "184 "Rain 4.50 p.m. (18th) to 8 a.m. (19th.)Nov. 20.9 "119 "Nov. 22.9 "29,336 "6,624 "Rain all of the previous night.Nov. 22.2 p.m.6,624 "Nov. 23.9 a.m.4,968 "Nov. 24.9 "1,711 "Nov. 24.2 p.m.1,417 "Dec. 17.9 a.m.552 "Dec. 18.9 "4,968 "Rain during the previous night.Dec. 30.10 "581 "
"The tract drained by this system, though very swampy,
before being drained, is now dry enough to walk upon,
almost immediately after a storm, except when underlaid
by a stratum of frozen ground."
The area drained by the main at which these gaugings
were made, is about ten acres, and, in deference to the
prevailing mania for large conduits, it had been laid with
6-inch sole-tile. The greatest recorded discharge in 24
hours was (August 25th,) less than 100,000 gallons from
the ten acres,—an amount of water which did not half fill
the tile, but which, according to the tables referred to,
would have entirely filled it.
In view of all the information that can be gathered
on the subject, the following directions are given as perfectly
reliable for drains four feet or more in depth, laid
on a well regulated fall of even three inches in a hundred
feet:
For 2 acres 1-1/4 inch pipes (with collars.)
For 8 acres 2-1/4 inch pipes (with collars.)
For 20 acres 3-1/2 inch pipes
For 40 acres 2 3-1/2 inch pipes or one 5-inch sole-tile.
For 50 acres 6 inch pipes sole-tile.
For 100 acres 8 inch pipes or two 6-inch sole-tiles.
It is not pretended that these drains will immediately
remove all the water of the heaviest storms, but they will
always remove it fast enough for all practical purposes,
and, if the pipes are securely laid, the drains will only be
benefited by the occasional cleansing they will receive
when running "more than full." In illustration of this
statement, the following is quoted from a paper communicated
by Mr. Parkes to the Royal Agricultural Society of
England in 1843:
"Mr. Thomas Hammond, of Penshurst, (Kent,) now
uses no other size for the parallel drains than the inch
tile in the table, (No. 5,) having commenced with No.
4,
No. 5 was one inch in diameter; No. 4, about 1-1/3 inches.
and it may be here stated, that the opinion of all the
farmers who have used them in the Weald, is that a bore
of an inch area is abundantly large. A piece of 9 acres,
now sown with wheat, was observed by the writer, 36
hours after the termination of a rain which fell heavily
and incessantly during 12 hours on the 7th of November.
This field was drained in March, 1842, to the depth
of 30 to 36 inches, at a distance of 24 feet asunder, the
length of each drain being 235 yards.
"Each, drain emptied itself through a fence bank into
a running stream in a road below it; the discharge
therefore was distinctly observable. Two or three of
the pipes had now ceased running; and, with the exception
of one which tapped a small spring and gave a
stream about the size of a tobacco pipe, the run from
the others did not exceed the size of a wheat straw.
The greatest flow had been observed by Mr. Hammond
at no time to exceed half the bore of the pipes. The
fall in this field is very great, and the drains are laid in
the direction of the fall, which has always been the practice
in this district. The issuing water was transparently
clear; and Mr. Hammond states that he has
never observed cloudiness, except for a short time after
very heavy flushes of rain, when the drains are quickly
cleared of all sediment, in consequence of the velocity
and force of the water passing through so small a channel.
Infiltration through the soil and into the pipes, must,
in this case, be considered to have been perfect; and
their observed action is the more determinate and valuable
as regards time and effect, as the land was saturated
with moisture previous to this particular fall of rain,
and the pipes had ceased to run when it commenced.
This piece had, previous to its drainage, necessarily
been cultivated in narrow stretches, with an open water
furrow between them; but it was now laid quite plain,
by which one-eighth of the continuation of acreage has
been saved. Not, however, being confident as to the
soil having already become so porous as to dispense entirely
with surface drains, Mr. Hammond had drawn
two long water furrows diagonally across the field. On
examining these, it appeared that very little water had
flowed along any part of them during these 12 hours of
rain,—no water had escaped at their outfall; the entire
body of rain had permeated the mass of the bed, and
passed off through the inch pipes; no water perceptible
on the surface, which used to carry it throughout. The
subsoil is a brick clay, but it appears to crack very
rapidly by shrinkage consequent to drainage."
Obstructions.—The danger that drains will become
obstructed, if not properly laid out and properly made, is
very great, and the cost of removing the obstructions,
(often requiring whole lines to be taken up, washed, and
relaid with the extra care that is required in working in
old and soft lines,) is often greater than the original cost
of the improvement. Consequently, the possibility of tile
drains becoming stopped up should be fully considered
at the outset, and every precaution should be taken to
prevent so disastrous a result.
The principal causes of obstruction are silt, vermin, and
roots.
Silt is earth which is washed into the tile with the
water of the soil, and which, though it may be carried
along in suspension in the water, when the fall is good,
will be deposited in the eddies and slack-water, which
occur whenever there is a break in the fall, or a defect in
the laying of the tile.
Whenever it is possible to avoid it, no drain should
have a decreasing rate of fall as it approaches its outlet.
If the first hundred feet from the upper end of the
drain has a fall of three inches, the next hundred feet
should not have less than three inches, lest the diminished
velocity cause silt, which required the speed which that
fall gives for its removal, to be deposited and to choke
the tile. This defect of grade is shown in Fig. 17. If the
second hundred feet has an inclination of more than
three inches, (Fig. 18,) the removal of silt will be even better
secured than if the fall continued at the original rate.
Some silt will enter newly made drains, in spite of our
utmost care, but the amount should be very slight, and
if it is evenly deposited throughout the whole length of
the drain, (as it sometimes is when the rate of fall is very
low,) it will do no especial harm; but it becomes dangerous
when it is accumulated within a short distance, by a
decreasing fall, or by a single badly laid tile, or imperfect
joint, which, by arresting the flow, may cause as much
mischief as a defective grade.
Owing to the general conformation of the ground, it is
sometimes absolutely necessary to adopt such a grade as
is shown in Fig. 19,—even to the extent of bringing the
drain down a rapid slope, and continuing it with the least
possible fall through level ground. When such changes
must be made, they should be effected by angles, and not
by curves. In increasing the fall, curves in the grade are
always advisable, in decreasing it they are always objectionable,
except when the decreased fall is still considerable,—say,
at least 2 feet in 100 feet. The reason for making
an absolute angle at the point of depression is, that it
enables us to catch the silt at that point in a silt basin,
from which it may be removed as occasion requires.
Fig. 19 - THREE PROFILES OF DRAINS, WITH DIFFERENT INCLINATIONS.
Illustration: Fig. 19 - THREE PROFILES OF DRAINS, WITH DIFFERENT INCLINATIONS.
A Silt Basin is a chamber, below the grade of the drain,
into which the water flows, becomes comparatively quiet,
and deposits its silt, instead of carrying it into the tile
beyond. It may be large or small, in proportion to the
amount of drain above, which it has to accommodate. For
a few hundred feet of the smallest tile, it may be only a
6-inch tile placed on end and sunk so as to receive and
discharge the water at its top. For a large main, it may
be a brick reservoir with a capacity of 2 or 3 cubic feet.
The position of a silt basin is shown in Fig. 19.
The quantity of silt which enters the drain depends very
much on the soil. Compact clays yield very little, and
wet, running sands, (quicksands,) a great deal. In a soil
of the latter sort, or one having a layer of running sand at
the level of the drain, the ditch should be excavated a little
below the grade of the drain, and then filled to that
level with a retentive clay, and rammed hard. In all cases
when the tile is well laid, (especially if collars are used,)
and a stiff earth is well packed around the tile, silt will
not enter the drain to an injurious extent, after a few
months' operation shall have removed the loose particles
about the joints, and especially after a few very heavy
rains, which, if the tiles are small, will sometimes wash
them perfectly clean, although they may have been half
filled with dirt.
Vermin,—field mice, moles, etc.,—sometimes make
their nests in the tile and thus choke them, or, dying
in them, stop them up with their carcases. Their entrance
should be prevented by placing a coarse wire cloth
or grating in front of the outlets, which afford the only
openings for their entrance.
Roots.—The roots of many water-loving trees,—especially
willows,—will often force their entrance into the
joints of the tile and fill the whole bore with masses of
fibre which entirely prevent the flow of water. Collars
make it more difficult for them to enter, but even these
are not a sure preventive. Gisborne says:
"My own experience as to roots, in connection with
deep pipe draining, is as follows: I have never known
roots to obstruct a pipe through which there was not a
perennial stream. The flow of water in summer and
early autumn appears to furnish the attraction. I have
never discovered that the roots of any esculent vegetable
have obstructed a pipe. The trees which, by my own
personal observation, I have found to be most dangerous,
have been red willow, black Italian poplar, alder,
ash, and broad-leaved elm. I have many alders in close
contiguity with important drains, and, though I have
never convicted one, I cannot doubt that they are dangerous.
Oak, and black and white thorns, I have not
detected, nor do I suspect them. The guilty trees have
in every instance been young and free growing; I have
never convicted an adult. These remarks apply solely
to my own observation, and may of course be much
extended by that of other agriculturists. I know an instance
in which a perennial spring of very pure and (I
believe) soft water is conveyed in socket pipes to a
paper mill. Every junction of two pipes is carefully
fortified with cement. The only object of cover being
protection from superficial injury and from frost, the
pipes are laid not far below the sod. Year by year these
pipes are stopped by roots. Trees are very capricious in
this matter. I was told by the late Sir R. Peel that he
sacrificed two young elm trees in the park at Drayton
Manor to a drain which had been repeatedly stopped by
roots. The stoppage was nevertheless repeated, and
was then traced to an elm tree far more distant than
those which had been sacrificed. Early in the autumn
of 1850 I completed the drainage of the upper part of a
boggy valley, lying, with ramifications, at the foot of
marly banks. The main drains converge to a common
outlet, to which are brought one 3-inch pipe and three of 4
inches each. They lie side by side, and water flows perennially
through each of them. Near to this outlet did
grow a red willow. In February, 1852, I found the
water breaking out to the surface of the ground about
10 yards above the outlet, and was at no loss for the
cause, as the roots of the red willow showed themselves
at the orifice of the 3-inch and of two of the 4-inch pipes.
On examination I found that a root had entered a joint
between two 3-inch pipes, and had traveled 5 yards to
the mouth of the drain, and 9 yards up the stream,
forming a continuous length of 14 yards. The root which
first entered had attained about the size of a lady's little
finger; and its ramifications consisted of very fine and
almost silky fibres, and would have cut up into half a
dozen comfortable boas. The drain was completely
stopped. The pipes were not in any degree displaced.
Roots from the same willow had passed over the 3-inch
pipes, and had entered and entirely stopped the first
4-inch drain, and had partially stopped the second. At
a distance of about 50 yards a black Italian poplar,
which stood on a bank over a 4-inch drain, had completely
stopped it with a bunch of roots. The whole of
this had been the work of less than 18 months, including
the depth of two winters. A 3-inch branch of the same
system runs through a little group of black poplars.
This drain conveys a full stream in plashes of wet, and
some water generally through the winter months, but
has not a perennial flow. I have perceived no indication
that roots have interfered with this drain. I draw
no general conclusions from these few facts, but they
may assist those who have more extensive experience in
drawing some, which may be of use to drainers."
Having considered some of the principles on which our
work should be based, let us now return to the map of the
field, and apply those principles in planning the work to be
done to make it dry.
The Outlet should evidently be placed at the present
point of exit of the brook which runs from the springs,
collects the water of the open ditches, and spreads over
the flat in the southwest corner of the tract, converting
it into a swamp. Suppose that, by going some distance
into the next field, we can secure an outlet of 3 feet and
9 inches (3.75) below the level of the swamp, and that we
decide to allow 3 inches drop between the bottom of the
tile at that point, and the reduced level of the brook to
secure the drain against the accumulation of sand, which
might result from back water in time of heavy rain. This
fixes the depth of drain at the outlet at 3-1/2 (3.50) feet.
At that side of the swamp which lies nearest to the
main depression of the up-land, (See Fig. 21,) is the proper
place at which to collect the water from so much of
the field as is now drained by the main brook, and at that
point it will be well to place a silt basin or well, built up
to the surface, which may, at any time, be uncovered for
an observation of the working of the drains. The land
between this point and the outlet is absolutely level, requiring
the necessary fall in the drain which connects the
two, to be gained by raising the upper end of it. As the
distance is nearly 200 feet, and as it is advisable to give a
fall at least five-tenths of a foot per hundred feet to so important
an outlet as this, the drain at the silt basin may
be fixed at only 2-1/2 feet. The basin being at the foot of
a considerable rise in the ground, it will be easy, within a
short distance above, to carry the drains which come to it
to a depth of 4 feet,—were this not the case, the fall between
the basin and the outlet would have to be very
much reduced.
Main Drains.—The valley through which the brook
now runs is about 80 feet wide, with a decided rise in the
land at each side. If one main drain were laid in the center
of it, all of the laterals coming to the main would first
run down a steep hillside, and then across a stretch of
more level land, requiring the grade of each lateral to be
broken at the foot of the hill, and provided with a silt
basin to collect matters which might be deposited when
the fall becomes less rapid. Consequently, it is best to
provide two mains, or collecting drains, (A and C,) one
lying at the foot of each hill, when they will receive the
laterals at their greatest fall; but, as these are too far
apart to completely drain the valley between them, and
are located on land higher than the center of the valley, a
drain, (B,) should be run up, midway between them.
The collecting drain, A, will receive the laterals from the
hill to the west of it, as far up as the 10-foot contour line,
and, above that point,—running up a branch of the valley,—it
will receive laterals from both sides. The drain, B,
may be continued above the dividing point of the valley,
and will act as one of the series of laterals. The drain, C,
will receive the laterals and sub-mains from the rising
ground to the east of it, and from both sides of the minor
valley which extends in that direction.
Most of the valley which runs up from the easterly side
of the swamp must be drained independently by the drain
E, which might be carried to the silt basin, did not its
continuation directly to the outlet offer a shorter course
for the removal of its water. This drain will receive laterals
from the hill bordering the southeasterly side of the
swamp, and, higher up, from both sides of the valley in
which it runs.
In laying out these main drains, more attention should
be given to placing them where they will best receive the
water of the laterals, and on lines which offer a good and
tolerably uniform descent, than to their use for the immediate
drainage of the land through which they pass.
Afterward, in laying out the laterals, the use of these lines
as local drains should, of course, be duly considered.
The Lateral Drains should next receive attention, and
in their location and arrangement the following rules
should be observed:
1st. They should run down the steepest descent of the
land.
2d. They should be placed at intervals proportionate to
their depth;—if 4 feet deep, at 40 feet intervals; if 3 feet
deep, at 20 feet intervals.
Fig. 20 - MAP WITH DRAINS AND CONTOUR LINES.
Illustration: Fig. 20 - MAP WITH DRAINS AND CONTOUR LINES.
3d. They should, as nearly as possible, run parallel to
each other.
On land of perfectly uniform character, (all sloping in
the same direction,) all of these requirements may be
complied with, but on irregular land it becomes constantly
necessary to make a compromise between them. Drains
running down the line of steepest descent cannot be parallel,—and,
consequently, the intervals between them cannot
be always the same; those which are farther apart at
one end than at the other cannot be always of a depth
exactly proportionate to their intervals.
In the adjustment of the lines, so as to conform as nearly
to these requirements as the shape of the ground will
allow, there is room for the exercise of much skill, and on
such adjustment depend, in a great degree, the success and
economy of the work. Remembering that on the map, the
line of steepest descent is exactly perpendicular to the contour
lines of the land, it will be profitable to study carefully
the system of drains first laid out, erasing and making
alterations wherever it is found possible to simplify
the arrangement.
Strictly speaking, all angles are, to a certain extent,
wasteful, because, if two parallel drains will suffice to drain
the land between them, no better drainage will be effected
by a third drain running across that land. Furthermore,
the angles are practically supplied with drains at less intervals
than are required,—for instance, at C 7 a on the
map the triangles included within the dotted line x, y,
will be doubly drained. So, also, if any point of a
4-foot drain will drain the land within 20 feet of it,
the land included within the dotted line forming a
semi-circle about the point C 14, might drain into the
end of the lateral, and it no more needs the action of
the main drain than does that which lies between the
laterals. Of course, angles and connecting lines are indispensable,
except where the laterals can run independently
across the entire field, and discharge beyond it.
The longer the laterals can be made, and the more angles
can be avoided, the more economical will the arrangement
be; and, until the arrangement of the lines has been made
as nearly perfect as possible, the time of the drainer can
be in no way so profitably spent as in amending his plan.
The series of laterals which discharge through the
mains A, C, D and E, on the accompanying map, have
been very carefully considered, and are submitted to the
consideration of the reader, in illustration of what has
been said above.
At one point, just above the middle of the east side of
the field, the laterals are placed at a general distance of
20 feet, because, as will be seen by reference to Fig. 4, a
ledge of rock, underground, will prevent their being made
more than 3 feet deep.
The line from H to I, (Fig. 20,) at the north side of
the field, connecting the heads of the laterals, is to be a
stone and tile drain, such as is described on page 60, intended
to collect the water which follows the surface of
the rock. (See Fig. 4.)
The swamp is to be drained by itself, by means of two
series of laterals discharging into the main lines F and G,
which discharge at the outlet, by the side of the main
drain from the silt-basin. By this arrangement, these
laterals, especially at the north side of the swamp, being
accurately laid, with very slight inclinations, can be placed
more deeply than if they ran in an east and west direction,
and discharged into the main, which has a greater inclination,
and is only two and a half feet deep at the basin.
Being 3-1/2 (3.50) feet deep at the outlet, they may
be made fully 3 feet deep at their upper ends, and, being
only 20 feet apart, they will drain the land as well as is
possible. The drains being now laid out, over the whole
field, the next thing to be attended to is
The Ordering of the Tile.—The main line from the outlet
up to the silt-basin, should be of 3-1/2-inch tiles, of which
about 190 feet will be required. The main drain A should
be laid with 2-1/4-inch tiles to the point marked m, near its
upper end, as the lateral entering there carries the water
of a spring, which is supposed to fill a 1-1/4-inch tile. The
length of this drain, from the silt-basin to that point is
575 feet. The main drain C will require 2-1/4 inch tiles from
the silt-basin to the junction with the lateral, which is
marked C 10, above which point there is about 1,700 feet
of drain discharging into it, a portion of which, being a
stone-and-tile drain at the foot of a rock, may be supposed
to receive more water than that which lies under the rest
of the land;—distance 450 feet. The main drain E requires
2-1/4-inch tiles from the outlet to the point marked o, a distance
of 380 feet. This tile will, in addition to its other
work, carry as much water from the spring, on the line of
its fourth lateral, as would fill a 1-1/4-inch pipe.
If the springs, when running at their greatest volume, be found to
require more than 1-1/4-inch tiles, due allowance must be made for the
increase.
The length of the main drains above the points indicated,
and of all the laterals, amounts to about 12,250 feet.
These all require 1-1/4-inch tiles.
Allowing about five per cent. for breakage, the order in
round numbers, will be as follows:
Owing to the irregularity of the ground, and the necessity for placing
some of the drains at narrower intervals, the total length of tile exceeds
by nearly 50 per cent. what would be required if it had a uniform slope,
and required no collecting drains. It is much greater than will be required
in any ordinary case, as a very irregular surface has been adopted
here for purposes of illustration.
3-1/2-inch round tiles 200 feet.
2-1/4-inch round tiles 1,500 feet.
1-1/4-inch round tiles 13,000 feet.
3-1/2-inch round tiles 1,600
2-1/4-inch round tiles 13,250
Order, also, 25 6-inch sole-tiles, to be used in making
small silt-basins.
It should be arranged to have the tiles all on the ground
before the work of ditching commences, so that there may
be no delay and consequent danger to the stability of the
banks of the ditches, while waiting for them to arrive. As
has been before stated, it should be especially agreed with
the tile-maker, at the time of making the contract, that
every tile should be perfect;—of uniform shape, and
neither too much nor too little burned.
Staking Out.—Due consideration having been given to
such preliminaries as are connected with the mapping of
the ground, and the arrangement, on paper, of the drains
to be made, the drainer may now return to his field, and,
while awaiting the arrival of his tiles, make the necessary
preparation for the work to be done. The first step is to
fix certain prominent points, which will serve to connect
the map with the field, by actual measurements, and this
will very easily be done by the aid of the stakes which
are still standing at the intersections of the 50-foot lines,
which were used in the preliminary levelling.
Commencing at the southwest corner of the field, and
measuring toward the east a distance of 34 feet, set a pole
to indicate the position of the outlet. Next, mark the
center of the silt-basin at the proper point, which will be
found by measuring 184 feet up the western boundary, and
thence toward the east 96 feet, on a line parallel with the
nearest row of 50-foot stakes. Then, in like manner, fix
the points C1, C6, C9, C10, and C17, and the angles
of the other main lines, marking the stakes, when placed,
to correspond with the same points on the map. Then
stake the angles and the upper ends of the laterals, and
mark these stakes to correspond with the map.
It will greatly facilitate this operation, if the plan of
the drains which is used in the field, from which the horizontal
lines should be omitted, have the intersecting 50-foot
lines drawn upon it, so that the measurements may
be made from the nearest points of intersection.
The stakes used may be 18 inches long, and driven one-half of their
length into the ground. They should have one side sufficiently smooth
to be distinctly marked with red chalk.
Having staked these guiding points of the drains, it is
advisable to remove all of the 50-foot stakes, as these are
of no further use, and would only cause confusion. It
will now be easy to set the remaining stakes,—placing one
at every 50 feet of the laterals, and at the intersections
of all the lines.
A system for marking the stakes is indicated on the
map, (in the C series of drains,) which, to avoid the confusion
which would result from too much detail on such a
small scale, has been carried only to the extent necessary
for illustration. The stakes of the line C are marked C1,
C2, C3, etc. The stakes of the sub-main C7, are marked
C7a, C7b, C7c, etc. The stakes of the lateral which
enters this drain at C7a, are marked C7a/1, C7a/2, C7a/3, etc.
etc. This system, which connects the lettering of each
lateral with its own sub-main and main, is perfectly simple,
and avoids the possibility of confusion. The position
of the stakes should all be lettered on the map, at the
original drawing, and the same designating marks put on
the stakes in the field, as soon as set.
Grade Stakes, (pegs about 8 or 10 inches long,) should
be placed close at the sides of the marked stakes, and
driven nearly their full length into the ground. The tops
of these stakes furnish fixed points of elevation from
which to take the measurements, and to make the computations
necessary to fix the depth of the drain at each
stake. If the measurements were taken from the surface
of the ground, a slight change of position in placing the
instrument, would often make a difference of some inches
in the depth of the drain.
Taking the Levels.—For accurate work, it is necessary
to ascertain the comparative levels of the tops of all of
the grade stakes; or the distance of each one of them
below an imaginary horizontal plane. This plane, (in which
we use only such lines as are directly above the drains,)
may be called the "Datum Line." Its elevation should
be such that it will be above the highest part of the land,
and, for convenience, it is fixed at the elevation of the levelling
instrument when it is so placed as to look over the
highest part of the field.
Levelling Instruments are of various kinds. The best
for the work in hand, is the common railroad level, which
is shown in Fig. 6. This is supported on three legs, which
bring it to about the level of the eye. Its essential parts
are a telescope, which has two cross-hairs intersecting each
other in the line of sight, and which may be turned on its
pivot toward any point of the horizon; a bubble glass
placed exactly parallel to the line of sight, and firmly
secured in its position so as to turn with the telescope;
and an apparatus for raising or depressing any side of the
instrument by means of set-screws. The instrument is
firmly screwed to the tripod, and placed at a point convenient
for looking over a considerable part of the highest
land. By the use of the set-screws, the plane in which the
instrument revolves is brought to a level, so that in whatever
direction the instrument is pointed, the bubble will be
in the center of the glass. The line of sight, whichever
way it is turned, is now in our imaginary plane. A convenient
position for the instrument in the field under consideration,
would be at the point, east of the center, marked
K, which is about 3 feet below the level of the highest
part of the ground. The telescope should stand about 5
feet above the surface of the ground directly under it.
The Levelling-Rod, (See Fig. 7,) is usually 12 feet long,
is divided into feet and hundredths of a foot, and has a
movable target which may be placed at any part of its
entire length. This is carried by an attendant, who holds
it perpendicularly on the top of the grade-stake, while the
operator, looking through the telescope, directs him to
move the target up and down until its center is exactly in
the line of sight. The attendant then reads the elevation,
and the operator records it as the distance below the
datum-line of the top of the grade-stake. For convenience,
the letterings of the stakes should be systematically
entered in a small field book, before the work commences,
and this should be accompanied by such a sketch of the
plan as will serve as a guide to the location of the lines on
the ground.
The following is the form of the field book for the main
drain C, with the levels recorded:
Lettering of the Stake.Depth from Datum Line.Silt Basin18.20C 115.44C 214.36C 312.85C 412.18C 511.79C 611.69C 711.55C 811.37C 911.06C 108.94C 118.52C 127.86C 137.70C 147.39C 157.06C 166.73
The levelling should be continued in this manner, until
the grades of all the points are recorded in the field book.
Fig. 21 - PROFILE OF DRAIN C.
Horizontal Scale, 66 ft. to the inch.
Vertical Scale, 15 ft. to the inch.
1 to 17. Numbers of Stakes.
(82) etc. Distances between Stakes.
18.20 etc. Depths from datum-line to surface.
2.50 etc. Depths of ditch.
20.70 etc. Depths from datum-line to drain.
Illustration: Fig. 21 - PROFILE OF DRAIN C.
If, from too great depression of the lower parts of the
field, or too great distances for observation, it becomes
necessary to take up a new position with the instrument,
the new level should be connected, by measurement, with
the old one, and the new observations should be computed
to the original plane.
It is not necessary that these levels should be noted on
the map,—they are needed only for computing the depth
of cutting, and if entered on the map, might be mistaken
for the figures indicating the depth, which it is more important
to have recorded in their proper positions, for convenience
of reference during the work.
The Depth and Grade of the Drains.—Having now
staked out the lines upon the land, and ascertained and
recorded the elevations at the different stakes, it becomes
necessary to determine at what depth the tile shall be
placed at each point, so as to give the proper fall to each
line, and to bring all of the lines of the system into accord.
As the simplest means of illustrating the principle on
which this work should be done, it will be convenient to
go through with the process with reference to the main
drain C, of the plan under consideration. A profile of this
line is shown in Fig. 21, where the line is broken at stake
No. 7, and continued in the lower section of the diagram.
The topmost line, from "Silt Basin" to "17," is the horizontal
datum-line. The numbers above the vertical lines indicate
the stakes; the figures in brackets between these, the
number of feet between the stakes; and the heavy figures
at the left of the vertical lines, the recorded measurements
of depth from the datum-line to the surface of the ground,
which is indicated by the irregular line next below the
datum-line. The vertical measurements are, of course,
very much exaggerated, to make the profile more marked,
but they are in the proper relation to each other.
The depth at the silt-basin is fixed at 2-1/2 feet (2.50.)
The rise is rapid to stake 3, very slight from there to stake
7, very rapid from there to stake 10, a little less rapid from
there to stake 11, and still less rapid from there to
stake 17.
To establish the grade by the profile alone, the proper
course would be to fix the depth at the stakes at which
the inclination is to be changed, to draw straight lines between
the points thus found, and then to measure the
vertical distance from these lines to the line indicating the
surface of the ground at the different stakes; thus, fixing
the depth at stake 3, at 4 feet and 13 hundredths,
The depth of 4.13, in Fig. 21, as well as the other depths at the points
at which the grade changes, happen to be those found by the computation,
as hereafter described, and they are used here for illustration.
the line
drawn from that point to the depth of 2.50, at the silt-basin,
will be 3 feet and 62 hundredths (3.62) below stake
1, and 3 feet and 92 hundredths (3.92) below stake 2. At
stake 7 it is necessary to go sufficiently deep to pass from 7
to 10, without coming too near the surface at 9, which is at
the foot of a steep ascent. A line drawn straight from
4.59 feet below stake 10 to 4.17 feet at stake 17, would be
unnecessarily deep at 11, 12, 13, and 14; and, consequently
it is better to rise to 4.19 feet at 11. So far as
this part of the drain is concerned, it would be well to
continue the same rise to 12, but, in doing so, we would
come too near the surface at 13, 14, and 15; or must considerably
depress the line at 16, which would either make
a bad break in the fall at that point, or carry the drain
too deep at 17.
By the arrangement adopted, the grade is broken at 3,
7, 10, and 11. Between these points, it is a straight line, with
the rate of fall indicated in the following table, which
commences at the upper end of the drain and proceeds toward
its outlet:
It will be seen that the fall becomes more rapid as we
ascend from stake 7, but below this point it is very much
reduced, so much as to make it very likely that silt will
be deposited, (see page 91), and the drain, thereby, obstructed.
To provide against this, a silt-basin must be
placed at this point which will collect the silt and prevent
its entrance into the more nearly level tile below. The
construction of this silt-basin is more particularly described
in the next chapter. From stake 7 to the main silt-basin
the fall is such that the drain will clear itself.
The drawing of regular profiles, for the more important
drains, will be useful for the purpose of making the beginner
familiar with the method of grading, and with the
principles on which the grade and depth are computed;
and sometimes, in passing over very irregular surfaces, this
method will enable even a skilled drainer to hit upon the
best adjustment in less time than by computation. Ordinarily,
however, the form of computation given in the following
table, which refers to the same drain, (C,) will be
more expeditious, and its results are mathematically more
correct.
The figures in this table, as well as in the next preceding one, are
adopted for the published profile of drain C, Fig. 21, to avoid confusion.
In ordinary cases, the points which are fixed as the basis of the computation
are given in round numbers;—for instance, the depth at C3 would
be assumed to be 4.10 or 4.20, instead of 4.13. The fractions given in the
table, and in Fig. 21, arise from the fact that the decimals are not absolutely
correct, being carried out only for two figures.
Fall. Feet and Decimals.Depth from Datum Line.No. of Stake.Distance Between Stakes.Per 100 Feet.Between Stakes.To Drain.To Surface.Depth of Drain.Remarks.Silt Basin.20.70 ft.18.20 ft.2.50 ft C. 1. 82 ft. 2 ft.1.64 ft.19.06 "15.44 "3.48 ft C. 2. 39 ft.do. .78 ft. 18.28 "14.36 "3.83 ft C. 3. 65 ft.do. 1.30 ft. 16.98 "12.85 "4.13 ft C. 4. 51 ft..56 .28 ft. 16.70 "12.18 "4.52 ft C. 5. 43 ft.do. .24 ft. 16.46 "11.79 "4.67 ft C. 6. 47 ft.do. .26 ft. 16.20 "11.69 "4.51 ft C. 7. 32 ft.do. .18 ft. 16.02 "11.55 "4.47 ft Silt-Basin here. Made deep at Nos. 7 and 10 to pass a depression of the surface at No. 9.C. 8. 41 ft. 2.83 1.16 ft. 14.86 "11.37 "3.49 ft C. 9. 12 ft.do. .34 ft. 14.52 "11.06 "3.46 ft C.10. 38 ft.do. .99 ft. 13.53 " 8.94 "4.59 ft C.11. 41 ft. 2.00 .82 ft. 12.61 " 8.52 "4.19 ft C.12. 41 ft. 1.09 .44 ft. 12.27 " 7.86 "4.41 ft C.13. 41 ft.do. .44 ft. 11.83 " 7.70 "4.13 ft C.14. 41 ft.do. .44 ft. 11.39 " 7.39 "4.00 ft C.15. 41 ft.do. .44 ft. 10.95 " 7.06 "3.89 ft C.16. 41 ft.do. .44 ft. 10.51 " 6.73 "3.88 ft C.17. 41 ft.do. .44 ft. 10.07 " 5.90 "4.17 ft
Note.—The method of making the foregoing computation
is this:
1st. Enter the lettering of the stakes in the first column, commencing
at the lower end of the drain.
2d. Enter the distances between each two stakes in the second column,
placing the measurement on the line with the number of the
upper stake of the two.
3d. In the next to the last column enter, on the line with each stake,
its depth below the datum-line, as recorded in the field book of levels,
(See page 105.)
4th. On the first line of the last column, place the depth of the lower
end of the drain, (this is established by the grade of the main or other
outlet at which it discharges.)
5th. Add this depth to the first number of the line next preceding it,
and enter the sum obtained on the first line of the fifth column, as the
depth of the drain below the datum-line.
6th. Having reference to the grade of the surface, (as shown by the
figures in the sixth column,) as well as to any necessity for placing the
drain at certain depths at certain places, enter the desired depth, in pencil,
in the last column, opposite the stakes marking those places. Then add
together this depth and the corresponding surface measurement in the
column next preceding, and enter the sum, in pencil, in the fifth column,
as the depth from the datum-line to the desired position of the drain.
(In the example in hand, these points are at Nos. 3, 7, 10, 11, and 17.)
7th. Subtract the second amount in the fifth column from the first
amount for the total fall between the two points—in the example, "3"
from "Silt-Basin." Divide this total fall, (in feet and hundredths,) by
one hundredth of the total number of feet between them. The result
will be the rate of fall per 100 feet, and this should be entered, in the
third column, opposite each of the intermediate distances between the
points.
Example:
Depth of the Drain at the Silt-Basin20.45 feet.Depth of the Drain at the Stake No. 316.98 feet.——Difference3.47 feet.Distance between the two186.— feet.
8th. Multiply the numbers of the second column by those of the third
and divide the product by 100. The result will be the amount of fall between
the stakes, (fourth column.)—Example: 1.87×82=153÷100=1.53.
9th. Subtract the first number of the fourth column from the first
number of the fifth column, (on the line above it,) and place the remainder
on the next line of the fifth column.—Example: 20.70-1.64=
19.06.
Then, from this new amount, subtract the second number of the
fourth column, for the next number of the fifth, and so on, until, in
place of the entry in pencil, (Stake 3,) we place the exact result of the
computation.
Proceed in like manner with the next interval,—3 to 7.
10th. Subtract the numbers in the sixth column from those in the
fifth, and the remainders will be the depths to be entered in the last.
Under the head of "Remarks," note any peculiarity of the drain
which may require attention in the field.
The main lines A, D, and E, and the drain B, should
next be graded on the plan set forth for C, and their laterals,
all of which have considerable fall, and being all so
steep as not to require silt-basins at any point,—can, by
a very simple application of the foregoing principles, be
adjusted at the proper depths. In grading the stone and
tile drain, (H, I,) it is only necessary to adopt the depth of
the last stakes of the laterals, with which it is connected,
as it is immaterial in which direction the water flows. The
ends of this drain,—from H to the head of the drain C10,
and from I to the head of C17,—should, of course, have a
decided fall toward the drains.
The laterals which are placed at intervals of 20 feet,
over the underground rock on the east side of the field,
should be continued at a depth of about 3 feet for nearly
their whole length, dropping in a distance of 8 or 10 feet
at their lower ends to the top of the tile of the main. The
intervals between the lower ends of C7c, C7d, and C7e,
being considerably more than 20 feet, the drains may be
gradually deepened, throughout their whole length from 3
feet at the upper ends to the depth of the top of the main
at the lower ends.
The main drains F and G, being laid in flat land, their
outlets being fixed at a depth of 3.50, (the floor of the
main outlet,) and it being necessary to have them as deep
as possible throughout their entire length, should be
graded with great care on the least admissible fall. This,
in ordinary agricultural drainage, may be fixed at .25, or
3 inches, per 100 feet. Their laterals should commence
with the top of their 1/4 tile even with the top of the 2-1/2 collar
of the main,—or .15 higher than the grade of the main,—and
rise, at a uniform inclination of .25, to the upper end.
Having now computed the depth at which the tile is to
lie, at each stake, and entered it on the map, we are ready
to mark these depths on their respective stakes in the field,
when the preliminary engineering of the work will be
completed.
It has been deemed advisable in this chapter to consider
the smallest details of the work of the draining engineer.
Those who intend to drain in the best manner will find
such details important. Those who propose to do their
work less thoroughly, may still be guided by the principles
on which they are based. Any person who will
take the pains to mature the plans of his work as closely
as has been here recommended, will as a consequence
commence his operations in the field much more understandingly.
The advantage of having everything decided
beforehand,—so that the workmen need not be delayed for
want of sufficient directions, and of making, on the map,
such alterations as would have appeared necessary in the
field, thus saving the cost of cutting ditches in the wrong
places, will well repay the work of the evenings of a
whole winter.
CHAPTER IV. - HOW TO MAKE THE DRAINS.
Knowing, now, precisely what is to be done; having
the lines all staked out, and the stakes so marked as to be
clearly designated; knowing the precise depth at which
the drain is to be laid, at every point; having the requisite
tiles on the ground, and thoroughly inspected, the operator
is prepared to commence actual work.
He should determine how many men he will employ,
and what tools they will require to work to advantage. It
may be best that the work be done by two or three
men, or it may be advisable to employ as many as can
work without interfering with each other. In most cases,—especially
where there is much water to contend with,—the
latter course will be the most economical, as the ditches
will not be so liable to be injured by the softening of their
bottoms, and the caving in of their sides.
The Tools Required are a subsoil plow, two garden
lines, spades, shovels, and picks; narrow finishing spades,
a finishing scoop, a tile pick, a scraper for filling the
ditches, a heavy wooden maul for compacting the bottom
filling, half a dozen boning-rods, a measuring rod, and a
plumb rod. These should all be on hand at the outset, so
that no delay in the work may result from the want of
them.
Fig. 22 - SET OF TOOLS.
Flat Spades of
various lengths
and widths, Bill-necked
Scoop (A);
Tile-layer (B);
Pick-axe (C); and
Scoop Spades, and
Shovel.
Illustration: Fig. 22 - SET OF TOOLS.
Writers on drainage, almost without exception, recommend
the use of elaborate sets of tools which are intended
for cutting very narrow ditches,—only wide enough at the
bottom to admit the tile, and not allowing the workmen
to stand in the bottom of the ditch. A set of these tools
is shown in Fig. 22.
Possibly there may be soils in which these implements,
in the hands of men skilled in their use, could be employed
with economy, but they are very rare, and it is not believed
to be possible, under any circumstances, to regulate
the bottom of the ditch so accurately as is advisable, unless
the workman can stand directly upon it, cutting it
more smoothly than he could if the point of his tool were
a foot or more below the level on which he stands.
On this subject, Mr. J. Bailey Denton, one of the first
draining engineers of Great Britain, in a letter to Judge
French, says:
"As to tools, it is the same with them as it is with the
art of draining itself,—too much rule and too much drawing
upon paper; all very right to begin with, but very
prejudicial to progress. I employ, as engineer to the
General Land Drainage Company, and on my private
account, during the drainage season, as many as 2,000
men, and it is an actual fact, that not one of them uses
the set of tools figured in print. I have frequently purchased
a number of sets of the Birmingham tools, and
sent them down on extensive works. The laborers would
purchase a few of the smaller tools, such as Nos. 290,
291, and 301, figured in Morton's excellent Cyclopædia
of Agriculture, and would try them, and then order
others of the country blacksmith, differing in several
respects; less weighty and much less costly, and moreover,
much better as working tools. All I require of the
cutters, is, that the bottom of the drain should be evenly
cut, to fit the size of the pipe. The rest of the work
takes care of itself; for a good workman will economize
his labor for his own sake, by moving as little earth as
practicable; thus, for instance, a first-class cutter, in
clays, will get down 4 feet with a 12-inch opening, ordinarily;
if he wishes to show off, he will sacrifice his
own comfort to appearance, and will do it with a 10-inch
opening."
In the Central Park work, sets of these tools were procured,
at considerable expense, and every effort was made
to compel the men to use them, but it was soon found that,
even in the easiest digging, there was a real economy in
using, for the first 3 feet of the ditch, the common spade,
pick, and shovel,—finishing the bottoms with the narrow
spade and scoop hereafter described, and it is probable
that the experience of that work will be sustained by that
of the country at large.
Marking the Lines.—To lay a drain directly under the
position of its stakes, would require that enough earth be
left at each point to hold the stake, and that the ditch be
tunneled under it. This is expensive and unnecessary. It
is better to dig the ditches at one side of the lines of
stakes, far enough away for the earth to hold them
firmly in their places, but near enough to allow measurements
to be taken from the grade pegs. If the ditch be
placed always to the right, or always to the left, of the line,
and at a uniform distance, the general plan will remain the
same, and the lines will be near enough to those marked
on the map to be easily found at any future time. In fact,
if it be known that the line of tiles is two feet to the right
of the position indicated, it will only be necessary, at any
time, should it be desired to open an old drain, to
measure two feet to the right of the surveyed position to
strike the line at once.
In soils of ordinary tenacity, ditches 4 feet deep need
not be more than twenty (20) inches wide at the surface,
and four (4) inches wide at the bottom. This will allow,
in each side, a slope of eight (8) inches, which is sufficient
except in very loose soils, and even these may be braced
up, if inclined to cave in. There are cases where the soil
contains so much running sand, and is so saturated with
water, that no precautions will avail to keep up the banks.
Ditches in such ground will sometimes fall in, until the excavation
reaches a width of 8 or 10 feet. Such instances,
however, are very rare, and must be treated as the occasion
suggests.
One of the garden lines should be set at a distance of
about 6 inches from the row of stakes, and the other at a
further distance of 20 inches. If the land is in grass, the
position of these lines may be marked with a spade, and
they may be removed at once; but, if it is arable land, it
will be best to leave the lines in position until the ditch is
excavated to a sufficient depth to mark it clearly. Indeed,
it will be well to at once remove all of the sod and surface
soil, say to a depth of 6 inches, (throwing this on the same
side with the stakes, and back of them.) The whole force
can be profitably employed in this work, until all of the
ditches to be dug are scored to this depth over the entire
tract to be drained, except in swamps which are still too
wet for this work.
Water Courses.—The brooks which carry the water
from the springs should be "jumped" in marking out
the lines, as it is desirable that their water be kept in separate
channels, so far as possible, until the tiles are ready
to receive it, as, if allowed to run in the open ditches, it
would undermine the banks and keep the bottom too soft
for sound work.
With this object, commence at the southern boundary
of our example tract, 10 or 15 feet east of the point of
outlet, and drive a straight, temporary, shallow ditch to a
point a little west of the intersection of the main line D
with its first lateral; then carry it in a northwesterly
direction, crossing C midway between the silt-basin and
stake C 1, and thence into the present line of the brook,
turning all of the water into the ditch. A branch of this
ditch may be run up between the lines F and G to receive
the water from the spring which lies in that direction.
This arrangement will keep the water out of the way
until the drains are ready to take it.
The Outlet.—The water being all discharged through
the new temporary ditch, the old brook, beyond the
boundary, should be cleared out to the final level (3.75,)
and an excavation made, just within the boundary, sufficient
to receive the masonry which is to protect the outlet.
A good form of outlet is shown in Fig. 23. It may
be cheaply made by any farmer, especially if he have good
stone at hand;—if not, brick may be used, laid on a solid
foundation of stout planks, which, (being protected from
the air and always saturated with water,) will last a very
long time.
Fig. 23 - OUTLET, SECURED WITH MASONRY AND GRATING.
Illustration: Fig. 23 - OUTLET, SECURED WITH MASONRY AND GRATING.
If made of stone, a solid floor, at least 2 feet square,
should be placed at, or below, the level of the brook. If
this consist of a single stone, it will be better than if of
several smaller pieces. On this, place another layer extending
the whole width of the first, but reaching only
from its inner edge to its center line, so as to leave a foot
in width of the bottom stone to receive the fall of the
water. This second layer should reach exactly the grade
of the outlet (3.50) or a height of 3 inches from the brook
level. On the floor thus made, there should be laid the
tiles which are to constitute the outlets of the several
drains; i.e., one 3-1/2-inch tile for the line from the silt-basin,
two 1-1/4-inch for the lines F and G, and one 2-1/4-inch
for the main line E. These tiles should lie close to each
other and be firmly cemented together, so that no water
can pass outside of them, and a rubble-work of stone may
with advantage be carried up a foot above them. Stone
work, which may be rough and uncemented, but should
always be solid, may then be built up at the sides, and
covered with a secure coping of stone. A floor and sloping
sides of stone work, jointed with the previously described
work, and well cemented, or laid in strong clay or
mortar, may, with benefit, be carried a few feet beyond the
outlet. This will effectually prevent the undermining of
the structure. After the entire drainage of the field is
finished, the earth above these sloping sides, and that back
of the coping, should be neatly sloped, and protected by
sods. An iron grating, fine enough to prevent the entrance
of vermin, placed in front of the tile, at a little distance
from them,—and secured by a flat stone set on edge and
hollowed out, so as merely to allow the water to flow freely
from the drains,—the stone being cemented in its place so
as to allow no water to pass under it,—will give a substantial
and permanent finish to the structure.
An outlet finished in this way, at an extra cost of a few
dollars, will be most satisfactory, as a lasting means of
securing the weakest and most important part of the system
of drains. When no precaution of this sort is taken,
the water frequently forces a passage under the tile for some
distance up the drains, undermining and displacing them,
and so softening the bottom that it will be difficult, in
making repairs, to secure a solid foundation for the work.
Usually, repairs of this sort, aside from the annoyance attending
them, will cost more than the amount required to
make the permanent outlet described above. As well constructed
outlets are necessarily rather expensive, as much
of the land as possible should be drained to each one that
it is necessary to make, by laying main lines which will
collect all of the water which can be brought to it.
The Main Silt-Basin.—The silt-basin, at which the
drains are collected, may best be built before any drains
are brought to it, and the work may proceed simultaneously
with that at the outlet. It should be so placed that
its center will lie exactly under the stake which marks its
position, because it will constitute one of the leading landmarks
for the survey of the drains.
The drains, which are removed a little to one side of the lines of
stakes, may be turned toward the basin from a distance of 3 or 4 feet.
Before removing the stake and grade stake, mark their
position by four stakes, set at a distance from it of 4 or 5
feet, in such positions that two lines, drawn from those
which are opposite to each other, will intersect at the point
indicated; and place near one of them a grade stake,
driven to the exact level of the one to be removed. This
being done, dig a well, 4 feet in diameter, to a depth of
2-1/2 feet below the grade of the outlet drain, (in the example
under consideration this would be 5 feet below the
grade stake.) If much water collects in the hole, widen
it, in the direction of the outlet drain, sufficiently to give
room for baling out the water. Now build, in this well,
a structure 2 feet in interior diameter, such as is shown in
Fig. 24, having its bottom 2 feet, in the clear, below the
grade of the outlet, and carry its wall a little higher than
the general surface of the ground. At the proper height
insert, in the brick work, the necessary for tiles all incoming
and outgoing drains; in this case, a 3-1/2-inch tile for
the outlet, 2-1/4-inch for the mains A and C, and 1-1/4-inch for
B and D.
Fig. 24 - SILT-BASIN, BUILT TO THE SURFACE.
Illustration: Fig. 24 - SILT-BASIN, BUILT TO THE SURFACE.
This basin being finished and covered with a flat stone
or other suitable material, connect it with the outlet by an
open ditch, unless the bottom
of the ditch, when laid open to the proper depth, be
found to be of muck or quicksand.
In such case, it will be best to lay the tile at
once, and cover it in for the
whole distance, as, on a soft
bottom, it would be difficult
to lay it well when the full
drainage of the field is flowing
through the ditch. The
tiles should be laid with all
care, on a perfectly regulated
fall,—using strips of board
under them if the bottom
is shaky or soft,—as on this line
depends the success of all the
drains above it, which might
be rendered useless by a
single badly laid tile at this point, or by any other cause
of obstruction to the flow.
While the work is progressing in the field above, there
will be a great deal of muddy water and some sticks,
grass, and other rubbish, running from the ditches above
the basin, and care must be taken to prevent this drain
from becoming choked. A piece of wire cloth, or basket
work, placed over the outlet in the basin, will keep out the
coarser matters, and the mud which would accumulate in
the tile may be removed by occasional flushing. This is
done by crowding a tuft of grass,—or a bit of sod,—into
the lower end of the tile (at the outlet,) securing it there
until the water rises in the basin, and then removing it.
The rush of water will be sufficient to wash the tile clean.
This plan is not without objections, and, as a rule, it is
never well to lay any tiles at the lower end of a drain
until all above it is finished; but when a considerable outlet
must be secured through soft land, which is inclined to
cave in, and to get soft at the bottom, it will save labor
to secure the tile in place before much water reaches it,
even though it require a daily flushing to keep it clean.
Opening the Ditches.—Thus far it has been sought to
secure a permanent outlet, and to connect it by a secure
channel, with the silt-basin, which is to collect the
water of the different series of drains. The next step
is to lay open the ditches for these. It will be best to
commence with the main line A and its laterals, as they
will take most of the water which now flows through the
open brook, and prevent its interference with the rest of
the work.
The first work is the opening of the ditches to a depth
of about 3 feet, which may be best done with the common
spade, pick, and shovel, except that in ground which is
tolerably free from stones, a subsoil plow will often take
the place of the pick, with much saving of labor. It may
be drawn by oxen working in a long yoke, which will allow
them to walk one on each side of the ditch, but this is dangerous,
as they are liable to disturb the stakes, (especially
the grade stakes,) and to break down the edges of the
ditches. The best plan is to use a small subsoil plow,
drawn by a single horse, or strong mule, trained to walk
in the ditch. The beast will soon learn to accommodate
himself to his narrow quarters, and will work easily in a
ditch 2-1/2 feet deep, having a width of less than afoot at the
bottom; of course there must be a way provided for him
to come out at each end. Deeper than this there is no
economy in using horse power, and even for this depth it
will be necessary to use a plow having only one stilt.
Before the main line is cut into the open brook, this
should be furnished with a wooden trough, which will
carry the water across it, so that the ditch shall
receive only the filtration from the ground.
Those laterals west of the main line, which are
crossed by the brook, had better not be opened
at present,—not until the water
of the spring is admitted to and
removed by the drain.
The other laterals and the
whole of the main line, having
been cut to a depth of 3 feet,
take a finishing spade, (Fig. 25,)
which is only 4 inches wide at
its point, and dig to within 2 or
3 inches of the depth marked
on the stakes, making the bottom
tolerably smooth, with the
aid of the finishing scoop, (Fig. 26,) and
giving it as regular an inclination as can be
obtained by the eye alone.
Fig. 27 - BRACING THE SIDES IN SOFT LAND.
Illustration: Fig. 27 - BRACING THE SIDES IN SOFT LAND.
If the ground is "rotten," and the banks
of the ditches incline to cave in, as is often
the case in passing wet places, the earth which is thrown
out in digging must be thrown back sufficiently far from
the edge to prevent its weight from increasing the
tendency; and the sides of the ditch
may be supported by bits of board
braced apart as is shown in Fig. 27.
The manner of opening
the ditches, which
is described above,
for the main A and
its laterals, will apply
to the drains of the
whole field and to all
similar work.
Grading the Bottoms.—The next step
in the work is to grade the bottoms of the
ditches, so as to afford a bed for the tiles
on the exact lines which are indicated by
the figures marked on the different stakes.
The manner in which this is to be
done may be illustrated by describing the
work required for the line from C10 to
C17, (Fig. 20,) after it has been opened,
as described above, to within 2 or 3 inches
of the final depth.
A measuring rod, or square, such as is
shown in Fig. 28,
The foot of the measuring rod should be shod with iron to prevent
its being worn to less than the proper length.
is set at C10, so that
the lower side of its arm is at the mark
4.59 on the staff, (or at a little less than 4.6
if it is divided only into feet and tenths,)
and is held upright in the ditch, with its
arm directly over the grade stake. The
earth below it is removed, little by little, until it will touch
the top of the stake and the bottom of the ditch at the
same time. If the ground is soft, it should be cut out
until a flat stone, a block of wood, or a piece of tile, or of
brick, sunk in the bottom, will have its surface at the exact
point of measurement. This point is the bottom of the
ditch on which the collar of the tile is to lie at that stake.
In the same manner the depth is fixed at C11 (4.19,) and
C12 (4.41,) as the rate of fall changes at each
of these points, and at C15 (3.89,) and C17
(4.17,) because (although the fall is uniform
from C12 to C17,) the distance is too great
for accurate sighting.
Fig. 29 - BONING ROD.
Illustration: Fig. 29 - BONING ROD.
Having provided boning-rods, which are
strips of board 7 feet long, having horizontal
cross pieces at their upper ends, (see Fig.
29,) set these perpendicularly on the spots
which have been found by measurement to
be at the correct depth opposite stakes 10,
11, 12, 15, and 17, and fasten each in its
place by wedging it between two strips of
board laid across the ditch, so as to clasp it,
securing these in their places by laying stones
or earth upon their ends.
As these boning-rods are all exactly 7 feet
long, of course, a line sighted across their
tops will be exactly 7 feet higher, at all
points, than the required grade of the ditch
directly beneath it, and if a plumb rod, (similar to
the boning-rod, but provided with a line and plummet,)
be set perpendicularly on any point of the bottom of
the drain, the relation of its cross piece to the line of sight
across the tops of the boning-rods will show whether the
bottom of the ditch at that point is too high, or too low,
or just right. The manner of sighting over two boning-rods
and an intermediate plumb-rod, is shown in Fig. 31.
Fig. 30 - POSITION OF WORKMAN AND USE OF FINISHING SCOOP.
Illustration: Fig. 30 - POSITION OF WORKMAN AND USE OF FINISHING SCOOP.
Three persons are required to finish the bottom of the
ditch; one to sight across the tops of the boning-rods, one
to hold the plumb-rod at different points as the finishing
progresses, and one in the ditch, (see Fig. 30,) provided
with the finishing spade and scoop,—and, in hard ground,
with a pick,—to cut down or fill up as the first man calls
"too high," or, "too low." An inch or two of filling maybe
beaten sufficiently hard with the back of the scoop,
but if several inches should be required, it should be well
rammed with the top of a pick, or other suitable instrument,
as any subsequent settling would disarrange the fall.
Fig. 31 - SIGHTING BY THE BONING-RODS.
Illustration: Fig. 31 - SIGHTING BY THE BONING-RODS.
As the lateral drains are to be laid first, they should be
the first graded, and as they are arranged to discharge into
the tops of the mains, their water will still flow off,
although the main ditches are not yet reduced to their final
depth. After the laterals are laid and filled in, the main
should be graded, commencing at the upper end; the tiles
being laid and covered as fast as the bottom is made ready,
so that it may not be disturbed by the water of which the
main carries so much more than the laterals.
Tile-Laying.—Gisborne says: "It would be scarcely
more absurd to set a common blacksmith to eye needles
than to employ a common laborer to lay pipes and collars."
The work comes under the head of skilled labor,
and, while no very great exercise of judgment is required
in its performance, the little that is required is imperatively
necessary, and the details of the work should be
deftly done. The whole previous outlay,—the survey and
staking of the field, the purchase of the tiles, the digging
and grading of the ditches—has been undertaken that we
may make the conduit of earthenware pipes which is now
to be laid, and the whole may be rendered useless by a
want of care and completeness in the performance of this
chief operation. This subject, (in connection with that of
finishing the bottoms of the ditches,) is very clearly treated
in Mr. Hoskyns' charming essay,
"Talpa, or the Chronicles of a Clay Farm."
as follows:
"It was urged by Mr. Brunel, as a justification for more
attention and expense in the laying of the rails of the
Great Western, than had been ever thought of upon
previously constructed lines, that all the embankments
and cuttings, and earthworks and stations, and law and
parliamentary expenses—in fact, the whole of the outlay
encountered in the formation of a railway, had for its
main and ultimate object a perfectly smooth and level
line of rail; that to turn stingy at this point, just when
you had arrived at the great ultimatum of the whole
proceedings, viz: the iron wheel-track, was a sort of
saving which evinced a want of true preception of the
great object of all the labor that had preceded it. It
may seem curious to our experiences, in these days, that
such a doctrine could ever have needed to be enforced
by argument; yet no one will deem it wonderful who
has personally witnessed the unaccountable and ever new
difficulty of getting proper attention paid to the leveling
of the bottom of a drain, and the laying of the tiles in
that continuous line, where one single depression or irregularity,
by collecting the water at that spot, year
after year, tends toward the eventual stoppage of the
whole drain, through two distinct causes, the softening
of the foundation underneath the sole, or tile flange, and
the deposit of soil inside the tile from the water collected
at the spot, and standing there after the rest had run off.
Every depression, however slight, is constantly doing
this mischief in every drain where the fall is but trifling;
and if to the two consequences above mentioned, we
may add the decomposition of the tile itself by the
action of water long stagnant within it, we may deduce
that every tile-drain laid with these imperfections in
the finishing of the bottom, has a tendency toward
obliteration, out of all reasonable proportion with
that of a well-burnt tile laid on a perfectly even inclination,
which, humanly speaking, may be called a permanent
thing. An open ditch cut by the most skillful
workman, in the summer, affords the best illustration of
this underground mischief. Nothing can look smoother
and more even than the bottom, until that uncompromising
test of accurate levels, the water, makes its appearance:
all on a sudden the whole scene is changed, the
eye-accredited level vanishes as if some earthquake had
taken place: here, there is a gravelly scour, along which
the stream rushes in a thousand little angry-looking ripples;
there, it hangs and looks as dull and heavy as if it
had given up running at all, as a useless waste of energy;
in another place, a few dead leaves or sticks, or a morsel
of soil broken from the side, dams back the water for a
considerable distance, occasioning a deposit of soil along
the whole reach, greater in proportion to the quantity
and the muddiness of the water detained. All this shows
the paramount importance of perfect evenness in the
bed on which the tiles are laid. The worst laid tile is
the measure of the goodness and permanence of the
whole drain, just as the weakest link of a chain is the
measure of its strength."
The simple laying of the smaller sizes of pipes and collars
in the lateral drains, is an easy matter. It requires
care and precision in placing the collar equally under the
end of each pipe, (having the joint at the middle of
the collar,) in having the ends of the pipes actually touch
each other within the collars, and in brushing away any
loose dirt which may have fallen on the spot on which the
collar is to rest. The connection of the laterals with
the mains, the laying of the larger sizes of tiles so as to
form a close joint, the wedging of these larger tiles firmly
into their places, and the trimming which is necessary in
going around sharp curves, and in putting in the shorter
pieces which are needed to fill out the exact length of the
drain, demand more skill and judgment than are often
found in the common ditcher. Still, any clever workman,
who has a careful habit, may easily be taught all that is
necessary; and until he is thoroughly taught,—and not
only knows how to do the work well, but, also, understands
the importance of doing it well,—the proprietor
should carefully watch the laying of every piece.
Never have tiles laid by the rod, but always by the
day. "The more haste, the less speed," is a maxim which
applies especially to tile-laying.
If the proprietor or the engineer does not overlook the
laying of each tile as it is done, and probably he will not,
he should carefully inspect every piece before it is covered.
It is well to walk along the ditches and touch each tile
with the end of a light rod, in such a way as to see
whether it is firm enough in its position not to be displaced
by the earth which will fall upon it in filling the
ditches.
Preparatory to laying, the tiles should be placed along
one side of the ditch, near enough to be easily reached by
a man standing in it. When collars are to be used, one of
these should be slipped over one end of each tile. The
workman stands in the ditch, with his face toward its
upper end. The first tile is laid with a collar on its lower
end, and the collar is drawn one-half of its length forward,
so as to receive the end of the next tile. The upper end
of the first tile is closed with a stone, or a bit of broken
tile placed firmly against it. The next tile has its nose
placed into the projecting half of the collar of the first
one, and its own collar is drawn forward to receive the
end of the third, and thus to the end of the drain, the
workman walking backward as the work progresses. By
and by, when he comes to connect the lateral with the
main, he may find that a short piece of tile is needed to
complete the length; this should not be placed next to the
tile of the main, where it is raised above the bottom of
the ditch, but two or three lengths back, leaving the connection
with the main to be made with a tile of full
length. If the piece to be inserted is only two or three
inches long, it may be omitted, and the space covered by
using a whole 2½-inch tile in place of the collar. In turning
corners or sharp curves, the end of the tile may be
chipped off, so as to be a little thinner on one side, which
will allow it to be turned at a greater angle in the collar.
If the drain turns a right angle, it will be better to dig
out the bottom of the ditch to a depth of about eight
inches, and to set a 6-inch tile on end in the hole, perforating
its sides, so as to admit the ends of the pipes at
the proper level. This 6-inch tile, (which acts as a small
silt-basin,) should stand on a board or on a flat stone, and
its top should be covered with a stone or with a couple of
bricks. Wood will last almost forever below the level of
the drain, where it will always be saturated with water,
but in the drier earth above the tile, it is much more liable
to decay.
Fig. 32 - PICK FOR DRESSING AND PREFORATING TILE.
Illustration: Fig. 32 - PICK FOR DRESSING AND PREFORATING TILE.
The trimming and perforating of the tile is done with a
"tile-pick," (Fig. 32,) the hatchet end,
tolerably sharp, being used for the
trimming, and the point, for making
the holes. This is done by striking
lightly around the circumference of
the hole until the center piece falls in,
or can be easily knocked in. If the
hole is irregular, and does not fit the
tile nicely, the open space should be
covered with bits of broken tile, to
keep the earth out.
As fast as the laterals are laid and inspected, they should
be filled in to the depth of at least a foot, to protect the
tiles from being broken by the falling of stones or lumps
of earth from the top, and from being displaced by water
flowing in the ditch. Two or three feet of the lower
end may be left uncovered until the connection with the
main is finished.
In the main drains, when the tiles are of the size with
which collars are used, the laying is done in the same manner.
If it is necessary to use 3-1/2-inch tiles, or any larger
size, much more care must be given to the closing of the
joints. All tiles, in manufacture, dry more rapidly at the
top, which is more exposed to the air, than at the bottom,
and they are, therefore, contracted and made shorter at
the top. This difference is most apparent in the larger
sizes. The large round tiles, which can be laid on any side,
can easily be made to form a close joint, and they
should be secured in their proper position by stones or
lumps of earth, wedged in between them and the sides of
the ditch. The sole tiles must lie with the shortest sides
up, and, usually, the space between two tiles, at the top,
will be from one-quarter to one-half of an inch. To
remedy this defect, and form a joint which may he protected
against the entrance of earth, the bottom should he
trimmed off, so as to allow the tops to come closer together.
Any opening, of less than a quarter of an inch,
can he satisfactorily covered,—more than that should not
be allowed. In turning corners, or in passing around
curves, with large tiles, their ends must he beveled off
with the pick, so as to fit nicely in this position.
The best covering for the joints of tiles which are
laid without collars, is a scrap of tin, bent so as to fit their
shape,—scraps of leather, or bits of strong wood shavings,
answer a very good purpose, though both of these latter require
to be held in place by putting a little earth over their
ends as soon as laid on the tile. Very small grass ropes
drawn over the joints, (the ends being held down with
stones or earth,) form a satisfactory covering, but care
should be taken that they be not too thick. A small handful
of wood shavings, thrown over the joints, also answers
a good purpose. Care, however, should always be taken,
in using any material which will decay readily, to have no
more than is necessary to keep the earth out, lest, in its
decay, it furnish material to be carried into the tile and obstruct
the flow. This precaution becomes less necessary
in the case of drains which always carry considerable
streams of water, but if they are at times sluggish in their
flow, too much care cannot be given to keep them free
of all possible causes of obstruction. As nothing is gained
by increasing the quantity of loose covering beyond what
is needed to close the joints, and as such covering is only
procured with some trouble, there is no reason for its extravagant
use.
There seems to remain in the minds of many writers on
drainage a glimmering of the old fallacy that underdrains,
like open drains, receive their water from above, and it is
too commonly recommended that porous substances be
placed above the tile. If, as is universally conceded, the
water rises into the tile from below, this is unnecessary.
The practice of covering the joints, and even covering the
whole tile, (often to the depth of a foot,) with tan-bark,
turf, coarse gravel, etc., is in no wise to be commended;
and, while the objections to it are not necessarily very
grave in all cases, it always introduces an element of insecurity,
and it is a waste of money, if nothing worse.
The tile layer need not concern himself with the question,
of affording entrance room for the water. Let him, so far
as the rude materials at hand will allow, make the joints
perfectly tight, and when the water comes, it will find
ample flaws in his work, and he will have been a good
workman if it do not find room to flow in a current, carrying
particles of dirt with it.
In ditches in which water is running at the time of laying
the tiles, the process should follow closely after the
grading, and the stream may even be dammed back, section
after section, (a plugged tile being placed under the
dam, to be afterwards replaced by a free one,) and graded,
laid and covered before the water breaks in. There is one
satisfaction in this kind of work,—that, while it is difficult
to lay the drain so thoroughly well as in a dry ditch, the
amount of water is sufficient to overcome any slight tendency
to obstruction.
Connections.—As has been before stated, lateral drains
should always enter at the top of the main. Even in the
most shallow work, the slightly decreased depth of the
lateral, which this arrangement requires, is well compensated
for by the free outlet which it secures.
After the tile of the main, which is to receive a side
drain, has been fitted to its place, and the point of junction
marked, it should be taken up and perforated; then
the end of the tile of the lateral should be so trimmed as
to fit the hole as accurately as may be, the large tile replaced
in its position, and the small one laid on it,—reaching
over to the floor of the lateral ditch. Then connect
it with the lateral as previously laid, fill up solidly
the space under the tile which reaches over to the top
of the main, (so that it cannot become disturbed in filling,)
and lay bits of tile, or other suitable covering,
around the connecting joint.
When chips of tile, or similar matters, are used to cover openings in
the tile-work, it is well to cover them at once with a mortar made of
wet clay, which will keep them in place until the ditches are filled.
Fig. 33 - LATERAL DRAIN ENTERING AT TOP.
Illustration: Fig. 33 - LATERAL DRAIN ENTERING AT TOP.
When the main drain is laid with collars, it should be
so arranged that, by
substituting a full
tile in the place of
the collar,—leaving,
within it, a
space between the
smaller pipes,—a
connection can be made with this larger tile, as is represented
in Figures 33 and 34.
Fig. 34 - SECTIONAL VIEW OF JOINT.
Illustration: Fig. 34 - SECTIONAL VIEW OF JOINT.
Silt-Basins should be used at all points where a drain,
after running for any considerable distance at a certain
rate of fall, changes to a less rapid fall,—unless, indeed,
the diminished fall be still
sufficiently great for the
removal of silty matters,
(say two feet or more in a
hundred). They may be
made in any manner which
will secure a stoppage of
the direct current, and afford room below the floor of the
tile for the deposit of the silt which the water has carried
in suspension; and they may be of any suitable material;—even
a sound flour barrel will serve a pretty good
purpose for many years.
The most complete form
of basin is that represented
in Figure 24.
When the object is
only to afford room for
the collection of the silt
of a considerable length
of drain, and it is not
thought worth while to
keep open a communication
with the surface, for
purposes of inspection, a
square box of brick
work, (Fig. 35,) having
a depth of one and a
half or two feet below
the floor of the drain,—tiles
for the drains being
built in the walls, and
the top covered with a
broad stone,—will answer
very well.
Fig. 36 - SILT-BASIN OF VITRIFIED PIPE.
Illustration: Fig. 36 - SILT-BASIN OF VITRIFIED PIPE.
A good sort of basin, to reach
to the surface of the ground, may
be made of large, vitrified drain
pipes,—such as are used for town
sewerage,—having a diameter of
from six to twelve inches, according
to the requirements of the work.
This basin is shown in Figure 36.
Figure 37 represents a basin made
of a 6-inch tile,—similar to that
described on page 130, for turning a
short corner. A larger basin of
the same size, cheaper than if built
of brick, may be made by using a large vitrified drain
pipe in the place of the one shown in the cut. These
vitrified pipes may be perforated in the
manner described for the common tile.
In laying the main line C, (Fig. 21,)
an underground basin of brick work,
(Fig. 35,) or its equivalent, should be
placed at stake 7, because at that point
the water, which has been flowing on an
inclination of 1.09, 2.00 and 2.83 per 100,
continues its course over the much less
fall of only 0.56 per 100.
If, among the tiles which have passed the inspection,
there are some which, from over burning, are smaller than
the average, they should be laid at the upper ends of the
laterals. The cardinal rule of the tile layer should be
never to have a single tile in the finished drain of smaller
size, of more irregular shape, or less perfectly laid, than
any tile above it. If there is to be any difference in the
quality of the drain, at different points, let it grow better
as it approaches the outlet and has a greater length
above depending upon its action.
Covering the Tiles, and Filling-in the Ditches.—The
best material for covering the tiles is that which will the
most completely surround them, so as to hold them in
their places; will be the least likely to have passages for
the flow of streams of water into the joints, and will afford
the least silt to obstruct the drain. Clay is the best
of all available materials, because it is of the most uniform
character throughout its mass, and may be most perfectly
compacted around the tiles. As has been before stated,
all matters which are subject to decay are objectionable,
because they will furnish fine matters to enter the joints,
and by their decrease of bulk, may leave openings in the
earth through which streams of muddy water may find
their way into the tiles. Gravel is bad, and will remain
bad until its spaces are filled with fine dirt deposited by
water, which, leaving only a part of its impurities here,
carries the rest into the drain. A gravelly loam, free
from roots or other organic matter, if it is strong enough
to be worked into a ball when wet, will answer a very
good purpose.
Ordinarily, the earth which was thrown out from the
bottom of the ditch, and which now lies at the top of the
dirt heap, is the best to be returned about the tiles, being
first freed from any stones it may contain which are large
enough to break or disturb the tiles in falling on to them.
If the bottom of the ditch consists of quicksand or
other silty matters, clay or some other suitable earth
should be sought in that which was excavated from a less
depth, or should be brought from another place. A thin
layer of this having been placed in the bottom of the
ditch when grading, a slight covering of the same about
the tiles will so encase them as to prevent the entrance of
the more "slippy" soil.
The first covering of fine earth, free from stones and
clods, should be sprinkled gently over the tiles, no full
shovelfuls being thrown on to them until they are covered
at least six inches deep. When the filling has reached a
height of from fifteen to twenty inches, the men may jump
into the ditch and tramp it down evenly and regularly,
not treading too hard in any one place at first. When
thus lightly compacted about the tile, so that any further
pressure cannot displace them, the filling should be repeatedly
rammed, (the more the better,) by two men
standing astride the ditch, facing each other, and working
a maul, such as is shown in Figure 38, and which may
weigh from 80 to 100 pounds.
Fig. 38 - MAUL FOR RAMMING.
Illustration: Fig. 38 - MAUL FOR RAMMING.
Those to whom this recommendation is new, will, doubtless,
think it unwise. The only reply to their objection
must be that others who shared their opinion, have, by
long observation and experience, been convinced of its
correctness. They may practically convince themselves
of the value of this sort of covering by a simple and inexpensive
experiment: Take two large, water-tight hogsheads,
bore through the side of each, a few inches from
the bottom, a hole just large enough
to admit a 1-1/4-inch tile; cover the bottom
to the hight of the lower edge of
the hole with strong, wet clay, beaten
to a hard paste; on this, lay a line of
pipes and collars,—the inner end sealed
with putty, and the tile which passes
through the hole so wedged about with
putty, that no water could pass out
between it and the outside of the hole.
Cover the tile in one hogshead with
loose gravel, and then fill it to the top
with loose earth. Cover the tile in the
other, twenty inches deep, with ordinary
stiff clay, (not wet enough to
puddle, but sufficiently moist to pack
well,) and ram it thoroughly, so as
to make sure that the tiles are completely
clasped, and that there is no
crack nor crevice through which water
can trickle, and then fill this hogshead
to the top with earth, of the
same character with that used in
the other case. These hogsheads should stand where
the water of a small roof, (as that of a hog-pen,) may
be led into them, by an arrangement which shall give
an equal quantity to each;—this will give them rather
more than the simple rain-fall, but will leave them
exposed to the usual climatic changes of the season. A
vessel, of a capacity of a quart or more, should be connected
with each outlet, and covered from the dust,—
these will act as silt-basins. During the first few storms
the water will flow off much more freely from the first
barrel; but, little by little, the second one, as the water
finds its way through the clay, and as the occasional drying,
and repeated filtration make it more porous, will increase
in its flow until it will, by the end of the season,
or, at latest, by the end of the second season, drain as
well as the first, if, indeed, that be not by this time somewhat
obstructed with silt. The amount of accumulation
in the vessels at the outlet will show which process has
best kept back the silt, and the character of the deposit
will show which would most probably be carried off by
the gentle flow of water in a nearly level drain.
It is no argument against this experiment that its results
cannot be determined even in a year, for it is not pretended
that drains laid in compact clay will dry land so completely
during the first month as those which give more
free access to the water; only that they will do so in a
comparatively short time; and that, as drainage is a work
for all time, (practically as lasting as the farm itself,) the
importance of permanence and good working for long
years to come, is out of all proportion to that of the temporary
good results of one or two seasons, accompanied
with doubtful durability.
It has been argued that surface water will be more
readily removed by drains having porous filling. Even if
this were true to any important degree,—which it is not,—it
would be an argument against the plan, for the remedy
would be worse than the disease. If the water flow from
the surface down into the drain, it will not fail to carry
dirt with it, and instead of the clear water, which alone
should rise into the tiles from below, we should have a
trickling flow from above, muddy with wasted manure
and silty earth.
The remaining filling of the ditch is a matter of simple
labor, and may be done in whatever way may be most
economical under the circumstances of the work. If the
amount to be filled is considerable, so that it is desirable
to use horse-power, the best way will be to use a scraper,
such as is represented in Figure 39, which is a strongly
ironed plank, 6 feet long and 18 inches wide, sharp shod
at one side, and supplied with handles at the other. It is
propelled by means of the curved rods, which are attached
to its under side by flexible joints. These rods
are connected by a chain which has links large enough to
receive the hook of an ox-chain. This scraper may be
used for any straight-forward work by attaching the power
to the middle of the chain. By moving the hook a few
links to the right or left, it will act somewhat after the
manner of the mould-board of a plow, and will, if skillfully
handled, shoot the filling rapidly into the ditch.
Fig. 39 - BOARD SCRAPER FOR FILLING DITCHES.
Illustration: Fig. 39 - BOARD SCRAPER FOR FILLING DITCHES.
If the work is done by hand, mix the surface soil and
turf with the subsoil filling for the whole depth. If with
a scraper, put the surface soil at the bottom of the loose
filling, and the subsoil at the top, as this will be an imitation,
for the limited area of the drains, of the process of
"trenching," which is used in garden cultivation.
When the ditches are filled, they will be higher than
the adjoining land, and it will be well to make them still
more so by digging or plowing out a small trench at each
side of the drain, throwing the earth against the mound,
which will prevent surface water, (during heavy rains,)
from running into the loose filling before it is sufficiently
settled. A cross section of a filled drain provided with
these ditches is shown in Figure 40.
Fig. 40 - CROSS-SECTION OF DITCH (FILLED), WITH FURROW AT EACH SIDE.
Illustration: Fig. 40 - CROSS-SECTION OF DITCH (FILLED), WITH FURROW AT EACH SIDE.
In order that the silt-basins may be examined, and their
accumulations of earth removed,
during the early action
of the drains, those parts
of the ditches which are above
them may be left open, care
being taken, by cutting surface
ditches around them, to
prevent the entrance of water
from above. During this time
the covers of the basins
should be kept on, and should
be covered with inverted sods
to keep loose dirt from getting
into them.
The stone and tile drain, H, I, is simply dug out to the
surface of the rock, if this is not more than two feet below
the grade of the upper ends of the laterals with which it
connects, and then filled up with loose stones to the line of
grade. If the stones are small, so as to form a good bottom
for the tiles, they may be laid directly upon it; if not, a
bottom for them may be made of narrow strips of cheap
boards. Before filling, the tiles and stone work should be
covered with shavings, and the filling above these should
consist of a strong clay, which will remain in place after
the shavings rot away.
Amending the Map.—When the tiles are laid, and before
they are covered, all deviations of the lines, as in passing
around large stones and other obstructions, which
may have prevented the exact execution of the original plan,
and the location and kind of each underground silt-basin
should also be carefully noted, so that they may be transferred
to the map, for future reference, in the event of repairs
becoming necessary. In a short time after the work
is finished, the surface of the field will show no trace of
the lines of drain, and it should be possible, in case of
need, to find any point of the drains with precision, so that
no labor will be lost in digging for it. It is much cheaper
to measure over the surface than to dig four feet trenches
through the ground.
CHAPTER V. - HOW TO TAKE CARE OF DRAINS AND DRAINED LAND.
So far as tile drains are concerned, if they are once well
laid, and if the silt-basins have been emptied of silt until
the water has ceased to deposit it, they need no care nor
attention, beyond an occasional cleaning of the outlet
brook. Now and then, from the proximity of willows, or
thrifty, young, water-loving trees, a drain will be obstructed
by roots; or, during the first few years after the work
is finished, some weak point,—a badly laid tile, a loosely
fitted connection between the lateral and a main, or an
accumulation of silt coming from an undetected and persistent
vein of quicksand,—will be developed, and repairs
will have to be made. Except for the slight danger
from roots, which must always be guarded against to the
extent of allowing no young trees of the dangerous class
to grow near a drain through which a constant stream of
water flows, it may be fairly assumed that drains which
have been kept in order for four or five years have passed
the danger of interruption from any cause, and they may
be considered entirely safe.
A drain will often, for some months after it is laid, run
muddy water after rains. Sometimes the early deposit of
silt will nearly fill the tile, and it will take the water of
several storms to wash it out. If the tiles have been laid
in packed clay, they cannot long receive silt from without,
and that which makes the flow turbid, may be assumed to
come from the original deposit in the conduit. Examinations
of newly laid drains have developed many instances
where tiles were at first half filled with silt, and three
months later were entirely clean. The muddiness of the
flow indicates what the doctors call "an effort of nature
to relieve herself," and nature may be trusted to succeed,
at least, until she abandons the effort. If we are sure that
a drain has been well laid, we need feel no anxiety because
it fails to take the water from the ground so completely
as it should do, until it settles into a flow of clear water
after the heaviest storms.
In the case of art actual stoppage, which will generally
be indicated by the "bursting out" of the drain, i.e., the
wetting of the land as though there were a spring under
it, or as though its water had no underground outlet,
(which is the fact,) it will be necessary to lay open the
drain until the obstruction is found.
In this work, the real value of the map will be shown,
by the facility which it offers for finding any point of any
line of drains, and the exact locality of the junctions with
the mains, and of the silt-basins. In laying out the plan
on the ground, and in making his map, the surveyor will
have had recourse to two or more fixed points; one of
them, in our example, (fig. 21,) would probably be the
center of the main silt-basin, and one, a drilled hole or
other mark on the rock at the north side of the field. By
staking out on the ground the straight line connecting
these two points, and drawing a corresponding line on the
map; we shall have a base-line, from which it will be easy,
by perpendicular offsets, to determine on the ground any
point upon the map. By laying a small square on the
map, with one of its edges coinciding with the base-line,
and moving it on this line until the other edge meets the
desired point, we fix, at the angle of the square, the point
on the base-line from which we are to measure the length
of the offset. The next step is to find, (by the scale,) the
distance of this point from the nearest end of the base-line,
and from the point sought. Then measure off, in the
field, the corresponding distance on the base-line, and, from
the point thus found, measure on a line perpendicular to
the base line, the length of the offset; the point thus
indicated will be the locality sought. In the same manner,
find another point on the same drain, to give the range on
which to stake it out. From this line, the drains which
run parallel to it, can easily be found, or it may be used
as a base-line, from which to find, by measuring offsets,
other points near it.
The object of this staking is, to find, in an inexpensive
and easy way, the precise position of the drains, for which
it would be otherwise necessary to grope in the dark,
verifying our guesses by digging four-foot trenches, at
random.
If there is a silt-basin, or a junction a short distance below
the point where the water shows itself, this will be the
best place to dig. If it is a silt-basin, we shall probably
find that this has filled up with dirt, and has stopped the
flow. In this case it should be cleaned out, and a point
of the drain ten feet below it examined. If this is found
to be clear, a long slender stick may be pushed up as far
as the basin and worked back and forth until the passage
is cleared. Then replace the tile below, and try with the
stick to clean the tiles above the basin, so as to tap the
water above the obstruction. If this cannot be done, or
if the drain ten feet below is clogged, it will be necessary
to uncover the tiles in both directions until an opening is
found, and to take up and relay the whole. If the wetting
of the ground is sufficient to indicate that there is
much water in the drain, only five or six tiles should be
taken up at a time, cleaned and relaid,—commencing at
the lower end,—in order that, when the water commences
to flow, it may not disturb the bottom of the ditch for the
whole distance.
If the point opened is at a junction with the main, examine
both the main and the lateral, to see which is
stopped, and proceed with one or the other, as directed
above. In doing this work, care should be taken to send
as little muddy water as possible into the drain below, and
to allow the least possible disturbance of the bottom.
If silt-basins have been placed at those points at which
the fall diminishes, the obstruction will usually be found to
occur at the outlets of these, from a piling up of the silt in
front of them, and to extend only a short distance below and
above. It is not necessary to take up the tiles until they
are found to be entirely clean, for, if they are only one-half
or one-third full, they will probably be washed clean
by the rush of water, when that which is accumulated
above is tapped. The work should be done in settled fair
weather, and the ditches should remain open until the effect
of the flow has been observed. If the tiles are made
thoroughly clean by the time that the accumulated water
has run off, say in 24 hours, they may be covered up; if
not, it may be necessary to remove them again, and clean
them by hand. When the work is undertaken it should
be thoroughly done, so that the expense of a new opening
need not be again incurred.
It is worse than useless to substitute larger sizes of tiles
for those which are taken up. The obstruction, if by silt,
is the result of a too sluggish flow, and to enlarge the
area of the conduit would only increase the difficulty. If
the tiles are too small to carry the full flow which follows
a heavy rain, they will be very unlikely to become choked,
for the water will then have sufficient force to wash them
clean, while if they are much larger than necessary, a deposit
of silt to one half of their height will make a broad,
flat bed for the stream, which will run with much less
force, and will be more likely to increase the deposit.
If the drains are obstructed by the roots of willows, or
other trees, the proprietor must decide whether he will
sacrifice the trees or the drains; both he cannot keep, unless
he chooses to go to the expense of laying in cement
all of the drains which carry constant streams, for a distance
of at least 50 feet from the dangerous trees. The
trouble from trees is occasionally very great, but its occurrence
is too rare for general consideration, and must be
met in each case with such remedies as circumstances suggest
as the best.
The gratings over the outlets of silt-basins which open
at the surface of the ground, are sometimes, during the
first year of the drainage, obstructed by a fungoid growth
which collects on the cross bars. This should be occasionally
rubbed off. Its character is not very well understood,
and it is rarely observed in old drains. The decomposition
of the grass bands which are used to cover the joints of
the larger tiles may encourage its formation.
If the surface soil have a good proportion of sand,
gravel, or organic matter, so as to give it the consistency
which is known as "loamy," it will bear any treatment
which it may chance to receive in cultivation, or as pasture
land; but if it be a decided clay soil, no amount of draining
will enable us to work it, or to turn cattle upon it
when it is wet with recent rains. It will much sooner
become dry, because of the drainage, and may much sooner
be trodden upon without injury; but wet clay cannot be
worked or walked over without being more or less puddled,
and, thereby, injured for a long time.
No matter how thoroughly heavy clay pasture lands
may be under-drained, the cattle should be removed from
them when it rains, and kept off until they are comparatively
dry. Neglect of this precaution has probably led
to more disappointment as to the effects of drainage than
any other circumstances connected with it. The injury
from this cause does not extend to a great depth, and in
the Northern States it would always be overcome by the
frosts of a single winter; as has been before stated, it is
confined to stiff clay soils, but as these are the soils which
most need draining, the warning given is important.
CHAPTER VI. - WHAT DRAINING COSTS.
Draining is expensive work. This fact must be accepted
as a very stubborn one, by every man who proposes to
undertake the improvement. There is no royal road to
tile-laying, and the beginner should count the cost at the
outset. A good many acres of virgin land at the West
might be bought for what must be paid to get an efficient
system of drains laid under a single acre at home. Any
man who stops at this point of the argument will probably
move West,—or do nothing.
Yet, it is susceptible of demonstration that, even at the
West, in those localities where Indian Corn is worth as
much as fifty cents per bushel at the farm, it will pay to
drain, in the best manner, all such land as is described in
the first chapter of this book as in need of draining. Arguments
to prove this need not be based at all on cheapness
of the work; only on its effects and its permanence.
In fact, so far as draining with tiles is concerned, cheapness
is a delusion and a snare, for the reason that it implies
something less than the best work, a compromise between
excellence and inferiority. The moment that we come
down from the best standard, we introduce a new element
into the calculation. The sort of tile draining which it is
the purpose of this work to advocate is a system so complete
in every particular, that it may be considered as an
absolutely permanent improvement. During the first
years of the working of the drains, they will require more
or less attention, and some expense for repairs; but, in
well constructed work, these will be very slight, and will
soon cease altogether. In proportion as we resort to cheap
devices, which imply a neglect of important parts of the
work, and a want of thoroughness in the whole, the expense
for repairs will increase, and the duration of the usefulness
of the drains will diminish.
Drains which are permanently well made, and which
will, practically, last for all time, may be regarded as a
good investment, the increased crop of each year, paying
a good interest on the money that they cost, and the
money being still represented by the undiminished value
of the improvement. In such a case the draining of the
land may be said to cost, not $50 per acre,—but the interest
on $50 each year. The original amount is well invested,
and brings its yearly dividend as surely as though
it were represented by a five-twenty bond.
With badly constructed drains, on the other hand, the
case is quite different. In buying land which is subject
to no loss in quantity or quality, the farmer considers, not
so much the actual cost, as the relation between the yearly
interest on the cost, and the yearly profit on the crop,—knowing
that, a hundred years hence, the land will still be
worth his money.
But if the land were bounded on one side by a river which
yearly encroached some feet on its bank, leaving the field
a little smaller after each freshet; or if, every spring, some
rods square of its surface were sure to be covered three feet
deep with stones and sand, so that the actual value of the
property became every year less, the purchaser would
compare the yearly value of the crops, not only with the
interest on the price, but, in addition to this, with so much
of the prime value as yearly disappears with the destruction
of the land.
It is exactly so with the question of the cost of drainage.
If the work is insecurely done, and is liable, in five
years or in fifty, to become worthless; the increase of the
crops resulting from it, must not only cover the yearly
interest on the cost, but the yearly depreciation as well.
Therefore what may seem at the time of doing the work
to be cheapness, is really the greatest extravagance. It is
like building a brick wall with clay for mortar. The bricks
and the workmanship cost full price, and the small saving on
the mortar will topple the wall over in a few years, while,
if well cemented, it would have lasted for centuries. The
cutting and filling of the ditches, and the purchase and
transportation of the tiles, will cost the same in every
case, and these constitute the chief cost; if the proper
care in grading, tile-laying and covering, and in making
outlets be stingily withheld,—saving, perhaps, one-tenth
of the expense,—what might have been a permanent improvement
to the land, may disappear, and the whole outlay
be lost in ten years. A saving of ten per cent. in
the cost will have lost us the other ninety in a short time.
But, while cheapness is to be shunned, economy is to be
sought in every item of the work of draining, and should
be studied, by proprietor and engineer, from the first examination
of the land, to the throwing of the last shovelful
of earth on to the filling of the ditch. There are few
operations connected with the cultivation of the soil in
which so much may be imperceptibly lost through neglect,
and carelessness about little details, as in tile-draining. In
the original levelling of the ground, the adjustment of the
lines, the establishing of the most judicious depth and inclination
at each point of the drains, the disposition of
surface streams during the prosecution of the work, and in
the width of the excavation, the line which divides
economy and wastefulness is extremely narrow and the
most constant vigilance, together with the best judgment
and foresight, are needed to avoid unnecessary cost. In
the laying and covering of the tile, on the other hand, it
is best to disregard a little slowness and unnecessary care
on the part of the workmen, for the sake of the most perfect
security of the work.
Details of Cost.—The items of the work of drainage
may be classified as follows:
1. Engineering and Superintendence.
2. Digging the ditches.
3. Grading the bottoms.
4. Tile and tile-laying.
5. Covering the tile and filling the ditches.
6. Outlets and silt-basins.
1. Engineering and Superintendence.—It is not easy to
say what would be the proper charge for this item of the
work. In England, the Commissioners under the Drainage
Acts of Parliament, and the Boards of Public Works,
fix the charge for engineering at $1.25 per acre. That is in a
country when the extent of lands undergoing the process
of draining is very great, enabling one person to superintend
large tracts in the same neighborhood at the same
time, and with little or no outlay for travelling expenses.
In this country, where the improvement is, thus far, confined
to small areas, widely separated; and where there
are comparatively few engineers who make a specialty of
the work, the charge for services is necessarily much
higher, and the amount expended in travelling much
greater. In most cases, the proprietor of the land must
qualify himself to superintend his own operations, (with
the aid of a country surveyor, or a railroad engineer in the
necessary instrumental work.) As draining becomes more
general, the demand for professional assistance will, without
doubt, cause local engineers to turn their attention to
the subject, and their services may be more cheaply obtained.
At present, it would probably not be prudent to
estimate the cost of engineering and superintendence, including
the time and skill of the proprietor, at less than
$5 per acre, even where from 20 to 50 acres are to be
drained at once.
2. Digging the Ditches.—The labor required for the
various operations constitutes the principal item of cost in
draining, and the price of labor is now so different in different
localities, and so unsettled in all, that it is difficult
to determine a rate which would be generally fair. It will
be assumed that the average wages of day laborers of the
class employed in digging ditches, is $1.50 per day, and
the calculation will have to be changed for different districts,
in proportion to the deviation of the actual rate of
wages from this amount. There is a considerable advantage
in having the work done at some season, (as after the
summer harvest, or late in the fall,) when wages are comparatively
low.
The cutting of the ditches should always be let by the
rod. When working at day's work, the men will invariably
open them wider than is necessary, for the sake of the
greater convenience of working, and the extra width
causes a corresponding waste of labor.
A 4-foot ditch, in most soils, need be only 20 inches wide
at the surface, and 4 inches at the bottom. This gives a
mean width of 12 inches, and requires the removal of
nearly 2-1/2 cubic yards of earth for each rod of ditch; but
an increase to a mean width of 16 inches, (which day
workmen will usually reach, while piece workmen almost
never will,) requires the removal of 3-1/4 cubic yards to the
rod. As the increased width is usually below the middle
of the drain, the extra earth will all have to be raised from
2 to 4 feet, and the extra 3/4 yards will cost as much as a
full yard taken evenly from the whole side, from top to
bottom.
In clay soils, free from stones or "hard pan," but so
stiff as to require considerable picking, ordinary workmen,
after a little practice, will be able to dig 3-1/2 rods of ditch
per day, to an average depth of 3.80,—leaving from 2 to
3 inches of the bottom of 4-foot ditches to be finished by
the graders. This makes the cost of digging about 43
cents per rod. In loamy soil the cost will be a little less
than this, and in very hard ground, a little more. In
sandy and peaty soils, the cost will not be more than 30
cents. Probably 43 cents would be a fair average for soils
requiring drainage, throughout the country.
This is about 17 cents for each yard of earth removed.
In soft ground, the caving in of the banks will require a
much greater mean width than 12 inches to be thrown out,
and, if the accident could not have been prevented by
ordinary care on the part of the workman, (using the bracing
boards shown in Fig. 28,) he should receive extra pay
for the extra work. In passing around large stones it may
also be necessary to increase the width.
The following table will facilitate the calculations for
such extra work:
CUBIC YARDS OF EXCAVATION IN DITCHES OF VARIOUS WIDTH.
Length of Ditch.12 Inches Wide.18 Inches Wide.24 Inches Wide.30 Inches Wide.36 Inches Wide.Yds. Feet.Yds. Feet.Yds. Feet.Yds. Feet.Yds. Feet.1 Yard.0 120 180 241 31 91 Rod.2 123 184 246 37 9
Men will, in most soils, work best in couples,—one
shovelling out the earth, and working forward, and the
other, (moving backward,) loosening the earth with a
spade or foot-pick, (Fig. 41.) In stony land, the men should
be required to keep their work well closed up,—excavating
to the full depth as they go. Then, if they strike a
stone too large to be taken out within the terms of their
contract, they can skip a sufficient distance to pass it, and
the digging of the omitted part may be done by a faithful
day workman. This will usually be cheaper and more
satisfactory than to pay the contractors for extra work.
Concerning the amount of work that one man can do
in a day, in different soils, digging ditches 4 feet deep,
French says: "In the writer's own field,
where the pick was used to loosen the lower
two feet of earth, the labor of opening and
filling drains 4 feet deep, and of the mean
width of 14 inches, all by hand labor, has
been, in a mile of drains, being our first experiments,
about one day's labor to 3 rods
in length. The excavated earth of such a
drain measures not quite 3 cubic yards,
(exactly, 2.85.)" In a subsequent work,
in a sandy soil, two men opened, laid, and
refilled 14 rods in one day;—the mean width
being 12 inches.
Surely such soil ought not to require thorough draining; where men
can go so easily, water ought to find its way alone.
"In the same season, the same men opened,
laid, and filled 70 rods of 4-foot drain of
the same mean width of 12 inches, in the
worst kind of clay soil, where the pick
was constantly used. It cost 35 days' labor to complete
the job, being 50 cents per rod for the labor alone." Or,
under the foregoing calculation of $1.50 per day, 75
cents per rod. These estimates, in common with nearly
all that are published, are for the entire work of digging,
grading, tile-laying, and refilling. Deducting the time required
for the other work, the result will be about as
above estimated; for the rough excavation, 3 1/2-rods to the
day's work, costing, at $1.50 per day, 43 cents to the rod.
Grading is the removal of 2 or 3 inches in depth, and
about 4 inches in width, of the soil at the bottom of the
ditch. It is chiefly done with the finishing scoop, which,
(being made of two thin plates, one of iron and one of
steel, welded together, the iron wearing away and leaving
the sharp steel edge always prominent,) will work in a
very hard clay without the aid of the pick. Three men,—the
one in the ditch being a skillful workman, and the
others helping him when not sighting the rods,—will grade
about 100 rods per day, making the cost about 6 cents per
rod. Until they acquire the skill to work thus rapidly, they
should not be urged beyond what they can readily do in
the best manner, as this operation, (which is the preparing
of the foundation for the tiles,) is probably the most important
of the whole work of draining.
Tiles and Tile-Laying.—After allowing for breakage, it
will take about 16 tiles and 16 collars to lay a rod in
length of drain. The cost of these will, of course, be
very much affected by the considerations of the nearness
of the tile-kiln and the cost of transportation. They
should, in no ordinary case, cost, delivered on the ground,
more than $8 per thousand for 1-1/4-inch tiles, and $4 per
thousand for the collars, making a total of $12 for both,
equal to about 19 cents per rod. The laying of the tiles,
may be set down at 2 cents per rod,—based on a skilled
man laying 100 rods daily, and receiving $2 per day.
Covering and filling will probably cost 10 cents per
rod, (if the scraper, Fig. 39, can be successfully used for
the rough filling, the cost will be reduced considerably
below this.)
The four items of the cost of making one rod of lateral
drain are as follows:
Digging the ditches- - - .43Grading- - - .06Tiles and laying- - - .21Covering and filling- - - .10- - -.80 cts.
If the drains are placed at intervals of 40 feet, there are
required 64 rods to the acre,—this at 80 cents per rod will
make the cost per acre,—for the above items,—$51.20.
How much should be allowed for main drains, outlets,
and silt-basins, it is impossible to say, as, on irregular
ground, no two fields will require the same amount of this
sort of work. On very even land, where the whole surface,
for hundreds of acres, slopes gradually in one or two
directions, the outlay for mains need not be more than
two per cent. of the cost of the laterals. This would allow
laterals of a uniform length of 800 feet to discharge into
the main line, at intervals of 40 feet, if we do not consider
the trifling extra cost of the larger tiles. On less
regular ground, the cost of mains will often be considerably
more than two per cent. of the cost of the laterals;
but in some instances the increase of main lines will be
fully compensated for by the reduction in the length of
the laterals, which, owing to rocks, hills too steep to need
drains at regular intervals, and porous, (gravelly,) streaks
in the land, cannot be profitably made to occupy the whole
area so thoroughly.
The land shown in Fig. 21, is especially irregular, and, for the purpose
of illustrating the principles upon which the work should be done,
an effort has been made to make the work as complete as possible in all
particulars. In actual work on a field similar to that, it would not
probably be good economy to make all the drains laid in the plan, but
as deviations from the plan would depend on conditions which cannot
well be shown on such a small scale, they are disregarded, and the system
of drains is made as it would be if it were all plain sailing.
Probably 7-1/2 per cent. of the cost of the laterals for
mains, outlets, and silt-basins will be a fair average allowance.
This will bring the total cost of the work to about $60
per acre, made up as follows:
Cost of the finished drains per acre - - - $51.20
7-1/2 per cent. added for mains, etc. - - - 3.83
Engineering and Superintendence - - - 5.00
Of course this is an arbitrary calculation, an estimate
without a single ascertained fact to go upon,—but it is as
close as it can be made to what would probably be the
cost of the best work, on average ground, at the present
high prices of labor and material. Five years ago the
same work could have been done for from $40 to $45 per
acre, and it will be again cheaper when wages fall, and
when a greater demand for draining tiles shall have caused
more competition in their manufacture. With a large
general demand, such as has existed in England for the last
20 years, they would now be sold for one-half of their present
price here, and the manufacture would be more profitable.
There are many light lands on retentive subsoils, which
could be drained, at present prices, for $50 or less per acre,
and there are others, which are very hard to dig, on which
thorough-draining could not now be done for $60.
The cost and the promise of the operation in each instance,
must guide the land owner in deciding whether or
not to undertake the improvement.
In doubtful cases, there is one compromise which may
be safely made,—that is, to omit each alternate drain, and
defer its construction until labor is cheaper.
This is doing half the work,—a very different thing
from half-doing the work. In such cases, the lines should
be laid out as though they were to be all done at once, and,
finally, when the omitted drains are made, it should be in
pursuance of the original plan. Probably the drains which
are laid will produce more than one-half of the benefit
that would result if they were all laid, but they will rarely
be satisfactory, except as a temporary expedient, and the
saving will be less than would at first seem likely, for when
the second drains are laid; the cultivation of the land
must be again interrupted; the draining force must be
again brought together; the levels of the new lines must
be taken, and connected with those of the old ones; and
great care must be taken, selecting the dryest weather for
the work,—to admit very little, if any, muddy water into
the old mains.
This practice of draining by installments is not recommended;
it is only suggested as an allowable expedient,
when the cost of the complete work could not be borne
with out inconvenience.
If any staid and economical farmer is disposed to be
alarmed at the cost of draining, he is respectfully reminded
of the miles of expensive stone walls and other
fences, in New England and many other parts of the
country, which often are a real detriment to the farms, occupying,
with their accompanying bramble bushes and
head lands, acres of valuable land, and causing great
waste of time in turning at the ends of short furrows in
plowing;—while they produce no benefit at all adequate
to their cost and annoyance.
It should also be considered that, just as the cost of
fences is scarcely felt by the farmer, being made when his
teams and hands could not be profitably employed in ordinary
farming operations, so the cost of draining will be
reduced in proportion to the amount of the work which
he can "do within himself,"—without hiring men expressly
for it. The estimate herein given is based on the
supposition that men are hired for the work, at wages
equal to $1.50 per day,—while draining would often
furnish a great advantage to the farmer in giving employment
to farm hands who are paid and subsisted by the year.
CHAPTER VII. - "WILL IT PAY?"
Starting with the basis of $60, as the cost of draining
an acre of ordinary farm land;—what is the prospect that
the work will prove remunerative?
In all of the older States, farmers are glad to lend their
surplus funds, on bond and mortgage on their neighbors'
farms, with interest at the rate of 7, and often 6 per cent.
In view of the fact that a little attention must be given
each year to the outlets, and, to the silt-basins, as well,
for the first few years, it will be just to charge for the use
of the capital 8-1/3 per cent.
This will make a yearly charge on the land, for the benefits
resulting from such a system of draining as has been
described, of five dollars per acre.
Will it Pay?—Will the benefits accruing, year after
year,—in wet seasons and in dry,—with root crops and
with grain,—with hay and with fruit,—in rotations of crops
and in pasture,—be worth $5 an acre?
On this question depends the value of tile-draining as a
practical improvement, for if there is a self-evident proposition
in agriculture, it is that what is not profitable,
one year with another, is not practical.
To counterbalance the charge of $5, as the yearly cost
of the draining, each acre must produce, in addition to
what it would have yielded without the improvement:
10 bushels of Corn at .50 per bushel.
3 bushels of Wheat at $1.66 per bushel.
5 bushels of Rye at 1.00 per bushel.
12-1/2 bushels of Oats at .40 per bushel.
10 bushels of Potatoes at .50 per bushel.
6-2/3 bushels of Barley at .75 per bushel.
1,000 pounds of Hay at 10.00 per ton.
50 pounds of Cotton at .10 per pound.
20 pounds of Tobacco at .25 per pound.
Surely this is not a large increase,—not in a single case,—and
the prices are generally less than may be expected
for years to come.
The United States Census Report places the average
crop of Indian Corn, in Indiana and Illinois, at 33 bushels
per acre. In New York it was but 27 bushels, and in Pennsylvania
but 20 bushels. It would certainly be accounted
extremely liberal to fix the average yield of such soils as
need draining, at 30 bushels per acre. It is extremely unlikely
that they would yield this, in the average of seasons,
with the constantly recurring injury from backward
springs, summer droughts, and early autumn frosts.
Heavy, retentive soils, which are cold and late in the
spring, subject to hard baking in midsummer, and to become
cold and wet in the early fall, are the very ones which are
best suited, when drained, to the growth of Indian Corn.
They are "strong" and fertile,—and should be able to
absorb, and to prepare for the use of plants, the manure
which is applied to them, and the fertilizing matters which
are brought to them by each storm;—but they cannot properly
exercise the functions of fertile soils, for the reason
that they are strangled with water, chilled by evaporation,
or baked to almost brick-like hardness, during nearly the
whole period of the growth and ripening of the crop.
The manure which has been added to them, as well as their
own chemical constituents, are prevented from undergoing
those changes which are necessary to prepare them for the
uses of vegetation. The water of rains, finding the spaces
in the soil already occupied by the water of previous rains,
cannot enter to deposit the gases which it contains,—or,
if the soil has been dried by evaporation under the influence
of sun and wind, the surface is almost hermetically
sealed, and the water is only slowly soaked up, much of
it running off over the surface, or lying to be removed
by the slow and chilling process of evaporation. In wet
times and in dry, the air, with its heat, its oxygen, and its
carbonic acid, (its universal solvent,) is forbidden to enter
and do its beneficent work. The benefit resulting from
cultivating the surface of the ground is counteracted by
the first unfavorable change of the weather; a single heavy
rain, by saturating the soil, returning it to nearly its original
condition of clammy compactness. In favorable
seasons, these difficulties are lessened, but man has no control
over the seasons, and to-morrow may be as foul as
to-day has been fair. A crop of corn on undrained, retentive
ground, is subject to injury from disastrous changes
of the weather, from planting until harvest. Even supposing
that, in the most favorable seasons, it would yield
as largely as though the ground were drained, it would
lose enough in unfavorable seasons to reduce the average
more than ten (10) bushels per acre.
The average crop, on such land, has been assumed to be
30 bushels per acre; it would be an estimate as moderate
as this one is generous, to say that, with the same cultivation
and the same manure, the average crop, after draining,
would be 50 bushels, or an increase equal to twice as
much as is needed to pay the draining charge. If the
method of cultivation is improved, by deep plowing, ample
manuring, and thorough working,—all of which may
be more profitably applied to drained than to undrained
land,—the average crop,—of a series of years,—will not
be less than 60 bushels.
The cost of extra harvesting will be more than repaid
by the value of the extra fodder, and the increased cultivation
and manuring are lasting benefits, which can be
charged, only in small part, to the current crop. Therefore,
if it will pay to plow, plant, hoe and harvest for 30
bushels of corn, it will surely pay much better to double
the crop at a yearly extra cost of $5, and, practically, it
amounts to this;—the extra crop is nearly all clear gain.
The quantity of Wheat required to repay the annual
charge for drainage is so small, that no argument is needed
to show that any process which will simply prevent
"throwing out" in winter, and the failure of the plant in
the wetter parts of the field, will increase the product
more than that amount,—to say nothing of the general
importance to this crop of having the land in the most
perfect condition, (in winter as well as in summer.)
It is stated that, since the general introduction of drainage
in England, (within the past 25 years,) the wheat
crop of that country has been more than doubled. Of
course, it does not necessarily follow that the amount per
acre has been doubled, large areas which were originally
unfit for the growth of this crop, having been, by draining,
excellently fitted for its cultivation;—but there can be no
doubt that its yield has been greatly increased on all
drained lands, nor that large areas, which, before being
drained, were able to produce fair crops only in the best
seasons, are now made very nearly independent of the
weather.
It is not susceptible of demonstration, but it is undoubtedly
true, that those clay or other heavy soils, which are
devoted to the growth of wheat in this country, would,
if they were thoroughly under-drained, produce, on the
average of years, at least double their present crop.
Mr. John Johnston, a venerable Scotch farmer, who has
long been a successful cultivator in the Wheat region of
Western New York,—and who was almost the pioneer of
tile-draining in America,—has laid over 50 miles of drains
within the last 30 years. His practice is described in
Klippart's Land Drainage, from which work we quote the
following:
"Mr. Johnston says he never saw 100 acres in any one
farm, but a portion of it would pay for draining. Mr.
Johnston is no rich man who has carried a favorite hobby
without regard to cost or profit. He is a hardworking
Scotch farmer, who commenced a poor man, borrowed
money to drain his land, has gradually extended his
operations, and is now reaping the benefits, in having
crops of 40 bushels of wheat to the acre. He is a gray-haired
Nestor, who, after accumulating the experience
of a long life, is now, at 68 years of age, written to by
strangers in every State of the Union for information,
not only in drainage matters, but all cognate branches
of farming. He sits in his homestead, a veritable Humboldt
in his way, dispensing information cheerfully
through our agricultural papers and to private correspondents,
of whom he has recorded 164 who applied to
him last year. His opinions are, therefore, worth more
than those of a host of theoretical men, who write without
practice." * * * * *
"Although his farm is mainly devoted to wheat, yet a
considerable area of meadow and some pasture has been
retained. He now owns about 300 acres of land. The
yield of wheat has been 40 bushels this year, and in former
seasons, when his neighbors were reaping 8, 10, or
15 bushels, he has had 30 and 40." * * * * *
"Mr. Johnston says tile-draining pays for itself in two
seasons, sometimes in one. Thus, in 1847, he bought a
piece of 10 acres to get an outlet for his drains. It was
a perfect quagmire, covered with coarse aquatic grasses,
and so unfruitful that it would not give back the seed
sown upon it. In 1848 a crop of corn was taken from it,
which was measured and found to be eighty bushels per
acre, and as, because of the Irish famine, corn was worth
$1 per bushel that year, this crop paid not only all the expense
of drainage, but the first cost of the land as well.
"Another piece of 20 acres, adjoining the farm of the
late John Delafield, was wet, and would never bring
more than 10 bushels of corn per acre. This was drained
at a great cost, nearly $30 per acre. The first crop after
this was 83 bushels and some odd pounds per acre. It
was weighed and measured by Mr. Delafield, and the
County Society awarded a premium to Mr. Johnston.
Eight acres and some rods of this land, at one side, averaged
94 bushels, or the trifling increase of 84 bushels
per acre over what it would bear before those insignificant
clay tiles were buried in the ground. But this increase
of crop is not the only profit of drainage; for Mr.
Johnston says that, on drained land, one half the usual
quantity of manure suffices to give maximum crops. It
is not difficult to find a reason for this. When the soil
is sodden with water, air can not enter to any extent,
and hence oxygen can not eat off the surfaces of soil-particles
and prepare food for plants; thus the plant
must in great measure depend on the manure for sustenance,
and, of course, the more this is the case, the more
manure must be applied to get good crops. This is one
reason, but there are others which we might adduce if
one good one were not sufficient.
"Mr. Johnston says he never made money until he
drained, and so convinced is he of the benefits accruing
from the practice, that he would not hesitate,—as he did
not when the result was much more uncertain than at
present,—to borrow money to drain. Drains well laid,
endure, but unless a farmer intends doing the job well,
he had best leave it alone and grow poor, and move out
West, and all that sort of thing. Occupiers of apparently
dry land are not safe in concluding that they need
not go to the expense of draining, for if they will but
dig a three-foot ditch in even the driest soil, water will
be found in the bottom at the end of eight hours, and
if it does come, then draining will pay for itself
speedily."
Some years ago, the Rural New Yorker published a
letter from one of its correspondents from which the following
is extracted:—
"I recollect calling upon a gentleman in the harvest field, when something
like the following conversation occurred:
'Your wheat, sir, looks very fine; how many acres have you in this
field?'
'In the neighborhood of eight, I judge.'
'Did you sow upon fallow?'
'No sir. We turned over green sward—sowed immediately upon the
sod, and dragged it thoroughly—and you see the yield will probably be
25 bushels to the acre, where it is not too wet.'
'Yes sir, it is mostly very fine. I observed a thin strip through it,
but did not notice that it was wet.'
'Well, it is not very wet. Sometimes after a rain, the water runs
across it, and in spring and fall it is just wet enough to heave the wheat
and kill it.'
I inquired whether a couple of good drains across the lot would not
render it dry.
'Perhaps so—but there is not over an acre that is killed out.'
'Have you made an estimate of the loss you annually sustain from
this wet place?'
'No, I had not thought much about it.'
'Would $30 be too high?'
'O yes, double.'
'Well, let's see; it cost you $3 to turn over the sward? Two bushels
of seed, $2; harrowing in, 75 cents; interest, taxes, and fences,
$5.25; 25 bushels of wheat lost, $25.'
'Deduct for harvesting—--'
'No; the straw would pay for that.'
'Very well, all footed $36.'
'What will the wheat and straw on this acre be worth this year?'
'Nothing, as I shall not cut the ground over.'
'Then it appears that you have lost, in what you have actually expended,
and the wheat you would have harvested, had the ground been
dry, $36, a pretty large sum for one acre.'
'Yes I see,' said the farmer."
While Rye may be grown, with tolerable advantage, on
lands which are less perfectly drained than is necessary
for Wheat, there can be no doubt that an increase of more
than the six and two-thirds bushels needed to make up the
drainage charge will be the result of the improvement.
While Oats will thrive in soils which are too wet for
many other crops, the ability to plant early, which is secured
by an early removal from the soil of its surplus water,
will ensure, one year with another, more than twelve
and a half bushels of increased product.
In the case of Potatoes, also, the early planting will be
a great advantage; and, while the cause of the potato-rot
is not yet clearly discovered, it is generally conceded
that, even if it does not result directly from too great
wetness of the soil, its development is favored by this
condition, either from a direct action on the tubers, or
from the effect in the air immediately about the plants,
of the exhalations of a humid soil.
An increase of from five to ten per cent. on a very ordinary
crop of potatoes, will cover the drainage charge,
and with facilities for marketing, the higher price of the
earlier yield is of much greater consequence.
Barley will not thrive in wet soil, and there is no question
that drainage would give it much more than the increased
yield prescribed above.
As to hay, there are many wet, rich soils which produce
very large crops of grass, and it is possible that drainage
might not always cause them to yield a thousand pounds
more of hay to the acre, but the quality of the hay from
the drained soil, would, of itself, more than compensate
for the drainage charge. The great benefit of the improvement,
with reference to this crop, however, lies in
the fact that, although wet, grass lands,—and by "wet" is
meant the condition of undrained, retentive clays, and
heavy loams, or other soils requiring drainage,—in a very
few years "run out," or become occupied by semi-aquatic
and other objectionable plants, to the exclusion of the
proper grasses; the same lands, thoroughly drained, may
be kept in full yield of the finest hay plants, as long as the
ground is properly managed. It must, of course, be manured,
from time to time, and care should be taken to prevent
the puddling of its surface, by men or animals,
while it is too wet from recent rain. With proper attention
to these points, it need not be broken up in a lifetime,
and it may be relied on to produce uniformly good crops,
always equal to the best obtained before drainage.
So far as Cotton and Tobacco are concerned, there are
not many instances recorded of the systematic drainage
of lands appropriated to their cultivation, but there is
every reason to suppose that they will both be benefitted
by any operation which will have the effect of placing the
soil in a better condition for the uses of all cultivated
plants. The average crop of tobacco is about 700 lbs.,
and that of cotton probably 250 lbs. An addition of one-fifth
to the cotton crop, and of only one thirty-fifth to the
tobacco crop, would make the required increase.
The failure of the cotton crop, during the past season,
(1866,) might have been entirely prevented, in many districts,
by the thorough draining of the land.
The advantages claimed for drainage with reference to
the above-named staple crops, will apply with equal, if not
greater force, to all garden and orchard culture. In fact,
with the exception of osier willows, and cranberries, there
is scarcely a cultivated plant which will not yield larger
and better crops on drained than on undrained land,—enough
better, and enough larger, to pay much more than
the interest on the cost of the improvement.
Yet, this advantage of draining, is, by no means, the
only one which is worthy of consideration. Since the
object of cultivation is to produce remunerative crops, of
course, the larger and better the crops, the more completely
is the object attained;—and to this extent the greatest
benefit resulting from draining, lies in the increased yield.
But there is another advantage,—a material and moral
advantage,—which is equally to be considered.
Instances of the profit resulting from under-draining,
(coupled, as it almost always is, with improved cultivation,)
are frequently published, and it would be easy to
fortify this chapter with hundreds of well authenticated
cases. It is, however, deemed sufficient to quote the following,
from an old number of one of the New York
dailies:—
"Some years ago, the son of an English farmer came to the United
States, and let himself as a farm laborer, in New York State, on the following
conditions: Commencing work at the first of September, he was
to work ten hours a day for three years, and to receive in payment a
deed of a field containing twelve acres—securing himself by an agreement,
by which his employer was put under bonds of $2,000 to fulfill his
part of the contract; also, during these three years, he was to have the
control of the field; to work it at his own expense, and to give his employer
one-half the proceeds. The field lay under the south side of a
hill, was of dark, heavy clay resting on a bluish-colored, solid clay subsoil,
and for many years previous, had not been known to yield anything
but a yellowish, hard, stunted vegetation.
"The farmer thought the young man was a simpleton, and that he,
himself, was most wise and fortunate; but the former, nothing daunted
by this opinion, which he was not unconscious that the latter entertained
of him, immediately hired a set of laborers, and set them to work in
the field trenching, as earnestly as it was well possible for men to labor.
In the morning and evening, before and after having worked his ten
hours, as per agreement, he worked with them, and continued to work
in this way until, about the middle of the following November, he had
finished the laying of nearly 5,000 yards of good tile under-drains. He
then had the field plowed deep and thoroughly, and the earth thrown up
as much as possible into ridges, and thus let it remain during the winter.
Next spring he had the field again plowed as before, then cross-plowed
and thoroughly pulverized with a heavy harrow, then sowed it
with oats and clover. The yield was excellent—nothing to be compared
to it had ever before been seen upon that field. Next year it gave two
crops of clover, of a rich dark green, and enormously heavy and luxuriant;
and the year following, after being manured at an expense of some
$7 an acre, nine acres of the field yielded 936 bushels of corn, and 25
wagon loads of pumpkins; while from the remaining three acres were
taken 100 bushels of potatoes—the return of this crop being upwards
of $1,200. The time had now come for the field to fall into the young
man's possession, and the farmer unhesitatingly offered him $1,500 to
relinquish his title to it; and when this was unhesitatingly refused, he
offered $2,000, which was accepted.
"The young man's account stood thus
Half proceeds of oats and straw, first year$165 00Half value of sheep pasturage, first year25 00Half of first crops of clover, first year112 50Half of second crops of clover, including seed, second year135 00Half of sheep pasturage, second year15 00Half of crops of corn, pumpkins and potatoes, third year690 00Received from farmer, for relinquishment of title2,000 00———Account Dr.$3,142 50To under-draining, labor and tiles$325 00To labor and manure, three seasons475 00To labor given to farmer, $16 per month, 36 months576 00—1,376 00———Balance in his favor$1,766 50
Draining makes the farmer, to a great extent, the
master of his vocation. With a sloppy, drenched, cold,
uncongenial soil, which is saturated with every rain, and
takes days, and even weeks, to become sufficiently dry to
work upon, his efforts are constantly baffled by unfavorable
weather, at those times when it is most important that
his work proceed without interruption. Weeks are lost,
at a season when they are all too short for the work to be
done. The ground must be hurriedly, and imperfectly
prepared, and the seed is put in too late, often to rot in the
over-soaked soil, requiring the field to be planted again at
a time which makes it extremely doubtful whether the
crop will ripen before the frost destroys it.
The necessary summer cultivation, between the rows,
has to be done as the weather permits; and much more
of it is required because of the baking of the ground.
The whole life of the farmer, in fact, becomes a constant
struggle with nature, and he fights always at a disadvantage.
What he does by the work of days, is mainly undone
by a single night's storm. Weeds grow apace, and
the land is too wet to admit of their being exterminated.
By the time that it is dry enough, other pressing work
occupies the time; and if, finally, a day comes when they
may be attacked, they offer ten times the resistance that
they would have done a week earlier. The operations of
the farm are carried on more expensively than if the
ability to work constantly allowed a smaller force to be
employed. The crops which give such doubtful promise,
require the same cultivation as though they were certain
to be remunerative, and the work can be done only with
increased labor, because of the bad condition of the soil.
From force of tradition and of habit, the farmer accepts
his fate and plods through his hard life, piously ascribing
to the especial interference of an inscrutable Providence,
the trials which come of his own neglect to use the means
of relief which Providence has placed within his reach.
Trouble enough he must have, at any rate, but not necessarily
all that he now has. It is not within the scope
of the best laid drains to control storm or sunshine,—but
it is within their power to remove the water of the storm,
rapidly and sufficiently, and to allow the heat of the sunshine
to penetrate the soil and do its hidden work. No
human improvement can change any of the so-called
"phenomena" of nature, or prevent the action of the
least of her laws; but their effects upon the soil and its
crops may be greatly modified, and that which, under certain
circumstances, would have caused inconvenience or
loss, may, by a change of circumstances, be made positively
beneficial.
In the practice of agriculture, which is pre-eminently
an economic art, draining will be prosecuted because of
the pecuniary profit which it promises, and,—very properly,—it
will not be pursued, to any considerable extent,
where the money, which it costs, will not bring money in
return. Yet, in a larger view of the case, its collateral
advantages are of even greater moment than its mere
profits. It is the foundation and the commencement of
the most intelligent farming. It opens the way for other
improvements, which, without it, would produce only
doubtful or temporary benefits; and it enables the farmer
so to extend and enlarge his operations, with fair promise
of success, as to raise his occupation from a mere waiting
upon the uncertain favors of nature, to an intelligent
handling of her forces, for the attainment of almost certain
results.
The rude work of an unthinking farmer, who scratches
the surface soil with his plow, plants his seed, and trusts
to the chances of a greater or less return, is unmitigated
drudgery,—unworthy of an intelligent man; but he
who investigates all of the causes of success and failure in
farming, and adapts every operation to the requirements
of the circumstances under which he works; doing everything
in his power that may tend to the production of the
results which he desires, and, so far as possible, avoiding
everything that may interfere with his success,—leaving
nothing to chance that can be secured, and securing all
that chance may offer,—is engaged in the most ennobling,
the most intelligent and the most progressive of all industrial
avocations.
In the cultivation of retentive soils, drainage is the key
to all improvement, and its advantage is to be measured
not simply by the effect which it directly produces in increasing
production, but, in still greater degree, by the
extent to which it prepares the way for the successful application
of improved processes, makes the farmer independent
of weather and season, and offers freer scope to
intelligence in the direction of his affairs.
CHAPTER VIII. - HOW TO MAKE DRAINING TILES.
Draining tiles are made of burnt clay, like bricks and
earthen-ware.
In general terms, the process is as follows:—The clay is
mixed with sand, or other substances which give it the proper
consistency, and is so wetted as to form a plastic mass, to
which may be given any desired form, and which is sufficiently
stiff to retain its shape. Properly prepared clay is
forced through the aperture of a die of the shape of the outside
of the tile, while a plug,—held by a support in the rear
of the die,—projects through the aperture, and gives the
form to the bore of the tile. The shape of the material
of the tile, as it comes from the die, corresponds to the
open space, between the plug and the edge of the aperture.
The clay is forced out in a continuous pipe, which
is cut to the desired length by a wire, which is so thin as
to pass through the mass without altering the shape of the
pipe. The short lengths of pipe are dried in the air as
thoroughly as they can be, and are then burned in a kiln,
similar to that used for pottery.
Materials.—The range of earths which may be used in
the manufacture of tiles is considerable, though clay is
the basis of all of them. The best is, probably, the clay
which is almost invariably found at the bottom of muck
beds, as this is finer and more compact than that which is
dug from dry land, and requires but little preparation.
There is, also, a peculiar clay, found in some localities,
which is almost like quick-sand in its nature, and which is
excellent for tile-making,—requiring no freezing, or washing
to prepare it for the machine. As a general rule, any
clay which will make good bricks will make tiles. When
first taken from the ground, these clays are not usually adhesive,
but become so on being moistened and kneaded.
It is especially important that no limestone pebbles be
mixed with the clay, as the burning would change these
to quicklime, which, in slaking, would destroy the tiles.
The presence of a limey earth, however, mixed through
the mass, is a positive advantage, as in this intimate
admixture, the lime forms, under the heat of the
kiln, a chemical combination with the other ingredients;
and, as it melts more readily than some of them, it hastens
the burning and makes it more complete. What is
known as plastic clay, (one of the purest of the native
clays,) is too strong for tile-making, and must be "tempered,"
by having other substances mixed with it, to give
it a stiffer quality.
The clay which is best for brick-making, contains
Silica, and Alumina in about the following proportions:
Silica ... 55 to 75 per cent.
Alumina ... 35 to 25 per cent.
Variable quantities of other materials are usually found
in connection with the clay, in its native condition. The
most common of these are the following:—
Magnesia 1 to 5 per cent.—sometimes 20 to 30 per cent.
Lime 0 to 19 per cent.
Potash 0 to 5 per cent.
Oxyd of iron 0 to 19 per cent.
"These necessary elements give fusibility to earthenware,
and, therefore, allow its constituent substances to
combine in such a manner as to form a resisting body;
and thus is performed with a temperature lower in proportion
as the necessary elements are more abundant."
Klippart's Land Drainage.
When the earth of the locality where tiles are to be
made is not sufficiently strong for the purpose, and plastic
clay can be cheaply obtained from a distance, a small
quantity of this may be used to give strength and tenacity
to the native material.
The compound must always contain a proper proportion
of clay and sand. If too little clay is used, the mass will
not be sufficiently tough to retain its compactness as it
passes through the die of the tile machine; if too little
sand, the moulded tiles will not be strong enough to bear
handling, and they will crack and warp in drying and burning.
Within the proper limits, the richer earths may be
moulded much thinner, and tiles made from them may,
consequently, be made lighter for transportation, without
being too weak. The best materials for tempering stiff
clays are sand, pounded brick or tile, or scoria, from
smelting furnaces.
Preparation Of Earths.—The clay from which tiles are
to be made, should be thrown out in the fall, (the upper
and lower parts of the beds being well mixed in the operation,)
and made into heaps on the surface, not more than
about 3 feet square and 3 feet high. In this form, it is left
exposed to the freezing and thawing of winter, which will
aid very much in modifying its character,—making it less
lumpy and more easily workable. Any stones which may
appear in the digging, should, of course, be removed, and
most earths will be improved by being passed through a
pair of heavy iron rollers, before they are piled up for the
winter. The rollers should be made of cast iron, about
15 inches in diameter, and 30 inches long, and set as close
together as they can be, and still be revolved by the power
of two horses. The grinding, by means of these rollers,
may add 50 cents per thousand to the cost of the tiles,
but it will greatly improve their quality.
In the spring, the clay should be prepared for tempering,
by the removal of such pebbles as it may still contain.
The best way to do this is by "washing," though, if there
be only a few coarse pebbles, they may be removed by
building the clay into a solid cone 2 or 3 feet high, and
then paring it off into thin slices with a long knife having
a handle at each end. This paring will discover any pebbles
larger than a pea that may have remained in the clay.
Washing is the process of mixing the clay with a considerable
quantity of water, so as to form a thin paste, in
which all stones and gravel will sink to the bottom; the
liquid portion is then drawn off into shallow pits or vats,
and allowed to settle, the clear water being finally removed
by pumping or by evaporation, according to the
need for haste. For washing small quantities of clay, a
common mortar bed, such as is used by masons, will answer,
if it be supplied with a gate for draining off the
muddy water after the gravel has settled; but, if the work
is at all extensive, a washing mill will be required. It
may be made in the form of a circular trough, with scrapers
for mixing the clay and water attached to a circular
horse-sweep.
"Another convenient mixing machine may be constructed
in the following manner: Take a large hollow log, of suitable
length, say five or six feet; hew out the inequalities
with an adz, and close up the ends with pieces of strong
plank, into which bearing have been cut to support a revolving
shaft. This shaft should be sufficiently thick to
permit being transfixed with wooden pins long enough to
reach within an inch or two of the sides of the log or
trough, and they should be so beveled as to form in their
aggregate shape an interrupted screw, having a direction
toward that end of the box where the mixed clay is designed
to pass out. In order to effect the mixing more
thoroughly, these pins may be placed sufficiently far apart
to permit the interior of the box to be armed with other
pins extending toward the center, between which they
can easily move. The whole is placed either horizontally
or vertically, and supplied with clay and water in proper
quantities, while the shaft is made to revolve by means of
a sweep, with horse power, running water or steam, as
the case may be. The clay is put into the end farthest
from the outlet, and is carried forward to it and mixed
by the motion, and mutual action and re-action of the pins
in the shaft and in the sides of the box. Iron pins may,
of course, be substituted for the wooden ones, and have
the advantage of greater durability and of greater strength
in proportion to their size, and the number may therefore
be greater in a machine of any given length. The fluid
mass of clay and water may be permitted to fall upon a
sieve or riddle, of heavy wire, and afterward be received
in a settling vat, of suitable size and construction, to drain
off the water and let the clay dry out sufficiently by subsequent
evaporation. A machine of this construction
may be made of such a size that it may be put in motion
by hand, by means of a crank, and yet be capable of
mixing, if properly supplied, clay enough to mold 800
or 1000 pieces of drain pipe per day."
Klippart's Land Drainage.
Mr. Parkes, in a report to the Royal Agricultural Society
of England, in 1843, says:
"It is requisite that the clay be well washed and sieved
before pugging, for the manufacture of these tiles, or the
operation of drawing them would be greatly impeded, by
having to remove stones from the small space surrounding
the die, which determines the thickness of the pipe.
But it results from this necessary washing, that the substance
of the pipe is uniformly and extremely dense,
which, consequently, gives it immense strength, and ensures
a durability which cannot belong to a more porous,
though thicker, tile.
"The clay is brought from the pug-mill so dry that,
when squeezed through the machine, not a drop of water
exudes,—moisture is, indeed, scarcely apparent on the
surface of the raw pipe. Hence, the tiles undergo little
or no change of figure while drying, which takes place
very rapidly, because of their firm and slight substance."
Tempering.—After the fine clay is relieved of the water
with which it was washed, and has become tolerably dry, it
should be mixed with the sand, or other tempering material,
and passed through the
Pug-Mill, (Fig. 42,) which will
thoroughly mix its various ingredients,
and work the whole into a
homogeneous mass, ready for the
tile machine. The pug-mill is
similar to that used in brick-yards,
only, as the clay is worked much
stiffer for tiles than for bricks,
iron knives must be substituted
for the wooden pins. These
knives are so arranged as to cut
the clay in every part, and, by
being set at an angle, they force it
downward toward the outlet gate
at the bottom. The clay should
be kept at the proper degree of moisture from the time of
tempering, and after passing through the pug-mill it
should be thoroughly beaten to drive out the air, and the
beaten mass should be kept covered with wet cloths to
prevent drying.
Moulding the Tiles.—Machines for moulding tiles are
of various styles, with much variation in the details of
their construction, but they all act on the same general
principle;—that of forcing the clay through a ring-shaped
aperture in an iron plate, forming a continuous pipe, which
is carried off on an endless apron, or on rollers, and cut
by wires into the desired lengths. The plates with the
ring-shaped apertures are called dies; the openings are
of any desired form, corresponding to the external shape
of the tiles; and the size and shape
of the bore, is determined by the
core or plug, which is held in the
centers of the apertures. The construction
of the die plates, and the
manner of fastening the plugs,
which determine the bore of the tiles, is shown in Fig. 43.
The view taken is of the inside of the plate.
Fig. 43 - PLATE OF DIES.
Illustration: Fig. 43 - PLATE OF DIES.
The machine consists usually of a strong iron chest,
with a hinged cover, into which the clay is placed, having
a piston moving in it, connected by a rod or bar, having
cog-teeth, with a cog-wheel, which is moved by horse or
hand power, and drives the piston forward with steadiness,
forcing the clay through the openings in the die-plate.
The clay issues in continuous lines of pipe. The machines
most in use in this country are connected directly with
the pug-mill, and as the clay is pugged, it at once passes
into the box, and is pressed out as tiles. These machines
are usually run by horse-power.
Mr. Barral, in his voluminous work on drainage,
Drainage des Terres Arables, Paris, 1856.
describes,
as follows, a cheap hand machine which can be
made by any country wheelwright, and which has a capacity
of 3,000 tiles per day (Fig. 44):
"Imagine a simple, wooden box, divided into two compartments.
In the rear compartment there stands a
vertical post, fastened with two iron bolts, having heads
at one end, and nuts and screws at the other. The box
is thus fixed to its support. We simply place this support
on the ground and bind its upper part with a rope
to a tree, a stake, or a post. The front compartment is
the reservoir for the clay, presenting at its front an
orifice, in which we fix the desired die with a simple bolt.
A wooden piston, of which the rod is jointed with a
lever, which works in a bolt at the top of the supporting
post, gives the necessary pressure. When the chest is
full of clay, we bear down on the end of the lever,
and the moulded tiles run out on a table supplied with
rollers. Raising the piston, it comes out of the box,
which is again packed with clay. The piston is replaced
in the box; pressure is again applied to the lever, and
so on. When the line of tiles reaches the end of the
table, we lower a frame on which brass wires are
stretched, and cut it into the usual lengths."
The workmen must attend well to the degree of moisture
of the clay which is put into the machine. It should
be dry enough to show no undue moisture on its surface
as it comes out of the die-plate, and sufficiently moist not
to be crumbled in passing the edge of the mould. The
clay for small (thin) tiles must, necessarily, be more moist
than that which is to pass through a wider aperture; and
for the latter there may, with advantage, be more sand in
the paste than would be practicable with the former.
After the tiles are cut into lengths, they are removed
by a set of mandrils, small enough to pass easily into
them, such as are shown in Fig. 45, (the number of fingers
corresponding with the
number of rows of tiles
made by the machine,) and
are placed on shelves made
of narrow strips sawn from
one-inch boards, laid with spaces between them to allow
a free circulation of air.
Fig. 45 - MANDRIL FOR CARRYING TILES FROM MACHINE.
Fig. 45 - MANDRIL FOR CARRYING TILES FROM MACHINE.
Drying and Rolling.—Care must be taken that freshly
made tiles be not dried too rapidly. They should be
sheltered from the sun and from strong winds. Too rapid
drying has the effect of warping them out of shape, and,
sometimes, of cracking the clay. To provide against this
injury, the drying is done under sheds or other covering,
and the side which is exposed to the prevailing winds is
sometimes boarded up.
For the first drying, the tiles are placed in single layers
on the shelves. When about half dried,—at which time
they are usually warped more or less from their true
shape,—it is well to roll them. This is done by passing
through them a smooth, round stick, (sufficiently smaller
than the bore to enter it easily, and long enough to project
five or six inches beyond each end of the tile,) and,—holding
one end of the stick in each hand,—rolling them
carefully on a table. This operation should be performed
when the tiles are still moist enough not to be broken by
the slight bending required to make them straight. After
rolling, the tiles may be piled up in close layers, some
four or five feet high, (which will secure them against
further warping,) and left until they are dry enough for
burning,—that is, as dry as they can be made by exposure
to the air.
Burning.—Tiles are burned in kilns in which, by the
effect of flame acting directly upon them, they are raised
to a heat sufficient to melt some of their more easily fusible
ingredients, and give to them a stone-like hardness.
Kilns are of various construction and of various sizes.
As this book is not intended for the instruction of those
who are engaged in the general manufacture of tiles, only
for those who may find it necessary to establish local
works, it will be sufficient to describe a temporary earthen
kiln which may be cheaply built, and which will answer
an excellent purpose, where only 100,000 or 200,000 tiles
per season will be required.
Directions for its construction are set forth in a letter
from Mr. T. Law Hodges, of England, to the late Earl
Spencer, published in the Journal of the Royal Agricultural
Society for the year 1843, as follows:
"The form of the clay-kiln is circular, 11 feet in diameter,
and 7 feet high. It is wholly built of damp, clayey
earth, rammed firmly together, and plastered, inside and
out, with loam (clay?). The earth to form the walls is dug
out around the base, leaving a circular trench about four
feet wide and as many deep, into which the fire-holes of
the kiln open. If wood be the fuel used, three fire-holes
will be sufficient; if coal, four will be needed. About
1,200 common brick will be wanted to build these fire-holes
and flues; if coal is used, rather fewer bricks will
be wanted, but, then, some iron bars are necessary,—six
bars to each fire-hole.
"The earthen walls are four feet thick at the floor of
the kiln, seven feet high, and tapering to a thickness of
two feet at the top; this will determine the slope of the
exterior face of the kiln. The inside of the wall is carried
up perpendicularly, and the loam plastering inside
becomes, after the first burning, like a brick wall. The
kiln may be safely erected in March, or whenever the
danger of injury from frost is over. After the summer
use of it, it must be protected, by faggots or litter,
against the wet and frost of winter. A kiln of these
dimensions will contain 32,500 1-1/4-inch tiles, * * *
or 12,000 2-1/4-inch tiles. * * *
"In good weather, this kiln can be filled, burnt, and
discharged once in every fortnight, and fifteen kilns
may be obtained in a good season, producing 487,500
1-1/4-inch tiles, and in proportion for the other sizes.
"It requires 2 tons 5 cwt. of good coals to burn the
above kiln, full of tiles."
Fig. 46 - CLAY-KILN.
Fig. 46 - CLAY-KILN.
A sectional view of this kiln is shown in Fig. 46, in
which C, C represent sections of the outer trench; A, one
of the three fire-holes; and B, B, sections of a circular
passage inside of the wall, connected with the fire-holes,
and serving as a flue for the flames, which, at suitable intervals,
pass through openings into the floor of the kiln.
The whole structure should be covered with a roof of
rough boards, placed high enough to be out of the reach
of the fire. A door in the side of the kiln serves for putting
in and removing the tiles, and is built up, temporarily,
with bricks or clay, during the burning. Mr. Hodges
estimates the cost of this kiln, all complete, at less than
$25. Concerning its value, he wrote another letter in
1848, from which the following is extracted:
"The experience of four years that have elapsed since
my letter to the late Earl Spencer, published in the 5th
volume of the proceedings of the Royal Agricultural
Society, page 57, has thoroughly tested the merits of
the temporary clay-kilns for the burning of draining-pipes
described in that letter.
"I am well aware that there were persons, even among
those who came to see it, who pronounced at once upon
the construction and duration of the kiln as unworthy
of attention. How far their expectations have been realized,
and what value belongs to their judgment, the following
short statement will exhibit:
"The kiln, in question, was constructed, in 1844, at a
cost of £5.
"It was used four times in that year, burning each
time between 18,000 and 19,000 draining pipes, of 1-3/4
inches in diameter.
"In 1845, it was used nine times, or about once a fortnight,
burning each time the same quantity of nearly
19,000 pipes.
"In 1846, the same result.
"In 1847, it has been used twelve times, always burning
the same quantity. In the course of the last year a
trifling repair in the bottom of the kiln, costing rather
less than 10 shillings, was necessary, and this is the only
cost for repair since its erection. It is now as good as
ever, and might be worked at least once a fortnight
through the ensuing season.
"The result of this experiment of four years shows not
only the practical value of this cheap kiln, but Mr.
Hatcher, who superintends the brick and tile-yard at Benenden,
where this kiln stands, expresses himself strongly
in favor of this kiln, as always producing better and
more evenly burned pipes than either of his larger and
better built brick-kilns can do."
The floor of the kiln is first covered with bricks, placed
on end, at a little distance from each other, so as to allow
the fire to pass between them, and the tiles are placed on
end on these. This position will afford the best draft for
the flames. After the kiln is packed full, the door-way is
built up, and a slow fire is started,—only enough at first
to complete the drying of the tiles, and to do this so
slowly as not to warp them out of shape. They will be
thoroughly dry when the smoke from the top of the kiln
loses its dark color and becomes transparent. When the
fires are well started, the mouths of the fire-holes may be
built up so as to leave only sufficient room to put in fresh
fuel, and if the wind is high, the fire-holes, on the side
against which it blows, should be sheltered by some sort
of screen which will counteract its influence, and keep up
an even heat on all sides.
The time required for burning will be from two days and
a night to four days and four nights, according to the dryness
of the tiles, the state of the weather, and the character
of the fuel. The fires should be drawn when the tiles in the
hottest part of the kiln are burned to a "ringing" hardness.
By leaving two or three holes in the door-way,
which can be stopped with loose brick, a rod may be run
in, from time to time, to take out specimen tiles from the
hottest part of the kiln, which shall have been so placed
as to be easily removed. The best plan, however,—the
only prudent plan, in fact,—will be to employ an intelligent
man who is thoroughly experienced in the burning
of brick and pottery, and whose judgment in the management
of the fires, and in the cooling off of the kiln, will
save much of the waste that would result from inexperienced
management. After the burning is completed, from
40 to 60 hours must be allowed for the cooling of the kiln
before it is opened. If the cold air is admitted while it is
still very hot, the unequal contraction of the material will
cause the tiles to crack, and a large portion of them may
be destroyed.
If any of the tiles are too much burned, they will be
melted, and may stick together, or, at least, have their
shape destroyed. Those which are not sufficiently burned
would not withstand the action of the water in the
soil, and should not be used. For the first of these accidents
there is no remedy; for the latter, reburning will
be necessary, and under-done tiles may be left, (or replaced,)
in the kiln in the position which they occupied at the
first burning, and the second heat will probably prove sufficient.
There is less danger of unequal burning in circular
than in square kilns. Soft wood is better than hard,
as making a better flame. It should be split fine, and well
seasoned.
Arrangement of the Tilery.—Such a tilery as is described
above should have a drying shed from 60 to 80
feet long, and from 12 to 18 feet wide. This shed may be
built in the cheapest and roughest manner, the roof being
covered with felting, thatch, or hemlock boards, as economy
may suggest. It should have a tier of drying shelves,
(made of slats rather than of boards,) running the whole
length of each side. A narrow, wooden tram-way, down
the middle, to carry a car, by which the green tiles may
be taken from the machine to the shelves, and the dry
ones from the shelves to the kiln, will greatly lessen the
cost of handling.
The pug-mill and tile-machine, as well as the clay pit
and the washing-mill, should be at one end of the shed,
and the kiln at the other, so that, even in rainy weather,
the work may proceed without interruption. A shed of
the size named will be sufficient to dry as many tiles of
assorted sizes as can be burned in the clay-kiln described
above.
The Cost of Tiles.—It would be impossible, at any
time, to say what should be the precise cost of tiles in a
given locality, without knowing the prices of labor and
fuel; and in the present unsettled condition of the currency,
any estimate would necessarily be of little value.
Mr. Parker's estimated the cost of inch pipes in England at
6s., (about $1.50,) per thousand, when made on the estate
where they were to be used, by a process similar to that
described herein. Probably they could at no time have
been made for less than twice that cost in the United States,—and
they would now cost much more; though if the clay
is dug out in the fall, when the regularly employed farm
hands are short of work, and if the same men can cut and
haul the wood during the winter, the hands hired especially
for the tile making, during the summer season, (two men
and two or three boys,) cannot, even at present rates of
wages, bring the cost of the tiles to nearly the market
prices. If there be only temporary use for the machinery,
it may be sold, when no longer needed, for a good percentage
of its original cost, as, from the slow movement
to which it is subjected, it is not much worn by its work.
There is no reason why tiles should cost more to make
than bricks. A common brick contains clay enough to
make four or five 1-1/4-inch tiles, and it will require about
the same amount of fuel to burn this clay in one form as
in the other. This advantage in favor of tiles is in a
measure offset by the greater cost of handling them, and
the greater liability to breakage.
The foregoing description of the different processes of
the manufacture of draining tiles has been given, in order
that those who find it necessary, or desirable, to establish
works to supply the needs of their immediate localities
may commence their operations understandingly, and form
an approximate opinion of the promise of success in the
undertaking.
Probably the most positive effect of the foregoing description,
on the mind of any man who contemplates establishing
a tilery, will be to cause him to visit some successful
manufactory, during the busy season, and examine for
himself the mode of operation. Certainly it would be unwise,
when such a personal examination of the process is
practicable, to rely entirely upon the aid of written descriptions;
for, in any work like tile-making, where the selection,
combination and preparation of the materials, the
means of drying, and the economy and success of the
burning must depend on a variety of conditions and circumstances,
which change with every change of locality, it is
impossible that written directions, however minute, should
be a sufficient guide. Still, in the light of such directions,
one can form a much better idea of the bearing of the
different operations which he may witness, than he could
possibly do if the whole process were new to him.
If a personal examination of a successful tilery is impracticable,
it will be necessary to employ a practical
brick-maker, or potter, to direct the construction and operation
of the works, and in any case, this course is advisable.
In any neighborhood where two or three hundred acres
of land are to be drained, if suitable earths can be readily
obtained, it will be cheaper to establish a tile-yard, than
to haul the necessary tiles, in wagons, a distance of ten or
twenty miles. Then again, the prices demanded by the
few manufacturers, who now have almost a monopoly of
the business, are exorbitantly high,—at least twice what
it will cost to make the tiles at home, with the cheap
works described above, so that if the cost of transportation
on the quantity desired would be equal to the cost of
establishing the works, there will be a decided profit in
the home manufacture. Probably, also, a tile-yard, in a
neighborhood where the general character of the soil is
such as to require drainage, will be of value after the object
for which it was made has been accomplished.
While setting forth the advantage to the farmer of
everything which may protect him against monopolies,
whether in the matter of draining-tile, or of any other
needful accessory of his business, or which will enable
him to procure supplies without a ruinous outlay for transportation,
it is by no means intended that every man shall
become his own tile-maker.
In this branch of manufacture, as in every other, organized
industry will accomplish results to which individual
labor can never attain. A hundred years ago,
when our mill-made cloths came from England, and cost
more than farmers could afford to pay, they wore home-spun,
which was neither so handsome nor so good as the
imported article; but, since that time, the growing population
and the greater demand have caused cloth mills to
be built here, greater commercial facilities have placed
foreign goods within easy reach, and the house loom has
fallen into general disuse.
At present, the manufacture of draining tiles is confined
to a few, widely separated localities, and each manufacturer
has, thus far, been able to fix his own scale of
charges. These, and the cost of transportation to distant
points, make it difficult, if not impossible, for many farmers
to procure tiles at a cost low enough to justify their
use. In such cases, small works, to supply local demand,
may enable many persons to drain with tiles, who, otherwise,
would find it impossible to procure them cheaply
enough for economical use; and the extension of under-draining,
causing a more general acquaintance with its
advantages, would create a sufficient demand to induce
an increase of the manufacture of tiles, and a consequent
reduction of price.
CHAPTER IX. - THE RECLAIMING OF SALT MARSHES.
"Adjoining to it is Middle Moor, containing about 2,500 acres, spoken
of by Arthur Young as 'a watery desert,' growing sedge and rushes,
and inhabited by frogs and bitterns;—it is now fertile, well cultivated,
and profitable land."
The foregoing extract, from an account of the Drainage
of the Fens on the eastern coast of England, is a text
from which might be preached a sermon worthy of the
attention of all who are interested in the vast areas of
salt marsh which form so large a part of our Atlantic
coast, from Maine to Florida.
Hundreds of thousands of acres that might be cheaply
reclaimed, and made our most valuable and most salubrious
lands, are abandoned to the inroads of the sea;—fruitful
only in malaria and musquitoes,—always a dreary
waste, and often a grave annoyance.
A single tract, over 20,000 acres in extent, the center
of which is not seven miles from the heart of New York
City, skirts the Hackensack River, in New Jersey, serving
as a barrier to intercourse between the town and the
country which lies beyond it, adding miles to the daily
travel of the thousands whose business and pleasure require
them to cross it, and constituting a nuisance and
an eyesore to all who see it, or come near it. How long it
will continue in this condition it is impossible to say, but
the experience of other countries has proved that, for an
expense of not more than fifty dollars per acre, this tract
might be made better, for all purposes of cultivation, than
the lands adjoining it, (many of which are worth, for market
gardening, over one thousand dollars per acre,) and
that it might afford profitable employment, and give homes,
to all of the industrious poor of the city. The work of
reclaiming it would be child's play, compared with the
draining of the Harlaem Lake in Holland, where over 40,000
acres, submerged to an average depth of thirteen feet,
have been pumped dry, and made to do their part toward
the support of a dense population.
The Hackensack meadows are only a conspicuous example
of what exists over a great extent of our whole seaboard;—virgin
lands, replete with every element of fertility,
capable of producing enough food for the support of
millions of human beings, better located, for residence and
for convenience to markets, than the prairies of the Western
States,—all allowed to remain worse than useless;
while the poorer uplands near them are, in many places,
teeming with a population whose lives are endangered,
and whose comfort is sadly interfered with by the insects
and the miasma which the marsh produces.
The inherent wealth of the land is locked up, and all of
its bad effects are produced, by the water with which it is
constantly soaked or overflowed. Let the waters of the
sea be excluded, and a proper outlet for the rain-fall and
the upland wash be provided,—both of which objects
may, in a great majority of cases, be economically accomplished,—and
this land may become the garden of the
continent. Its fertility will attract a population, (especially
in the vicinity of large towns,) which could no
where else live so well nor so easily.
The manner in which these salt marshes were formed
may be understood from the following account of the
"Great Level of the Fens" of the eastern coast of England,
which is copied, (as is the paragraph at the head of
this chapter,) from the Prize Essay of Mr. John Algernon
Clarke, written for the Royal Agricultural Society in 1846.
The process is not, of course, always the same, nor are
the exact influences, which made the English Fens, generally,
operating in precisely the same manner here, but the
main principle is the same, and the lesson taught by the
improvement of the Fens is perfectly applicable in our case.
"This great level extends itself into the six counties of
Cambridge, Lincoln, Huntington, Northampton, Suffolk
and Norfolk, being bounded by the highlands of each.
It is about seventy miles in length, and varies from
twenty to forty miles in breadth, having an area of more
than 680,000 acres. Through this vast extent of flat
country, there flow six large rivers, with their tributary
streams; namely, the Ouse, the Cam, the Nene, the Welland,
the Glen, and the Witham.
"These were, originally, natural channels for conveying
the upland waters to the sea, and whenever a heavier
downfall of rain than usual occurred, and the swollen
springs and rivulets caused the rivers to overflow, they
must necessarily have overflowed the land to a great extent.
"This, however, was not the principal cause of the inundation
of the Fens: these rivers were not allowed a
free passage to the ocean, being thus made incapable of
carrying off even the ordinary amount of upland water
which, consequently, flowed over the land. The obstruction
was two-fold; first, the outfalls became blocked up
by the deposits of silt from the sea waters, which accumulated
to an amazing thickness. The well known
instances of boats found in 1635 eight feet below the
Wisbeck River, and the smith's forge and tools found at
Skirbeck Shoals, near Boston, buried with silt sixteen feet
deep, show what an astonishing quantity of sediment
formerly choked up the mouths of these great rivers.
But the chief hindrance caused by the ocean, arose from
the tide rushing twice every day for a very great distance
up these channels, driving back the fresh waters,
and overflowing with them, so that the whole level became
deluged with deep water, and was, in fact, one
great bay.
"In considering the state of this region as it first attracted
the enterprise of man to its improvement, we
are to conceive a vast, wild morass, with only small, detached
portions of cultivated soil, or islands, raised above
the general inundation; a most desolate picture when
contrasted with its present state of matchless fertility."
Salt marshes are formed of the silty deposits of rivers
and of the sea. The former bring down vegetable mould
and fine earth from the uplands, and the latter contribute
sea weeds and grasses, sand and shells, and millions of
animalculæ which, born for life in salt water only, die,
and are deposited with the other matters, at those points
where, from admixture with the fresh flow of the rivers, the
water ceases to be suitable for their support. It is estimated
that these animalculæ alone are the chief cause of
the obstructions at the mouths of the rivers of Holland,
which retard their flow, and cause them to spread over the
flat country adjoining their banks. It is less important,
however, for the purposes of this chapter, to consider the
manner in which salt marshes are formed, than to discuss
the means by which they may be reclaimed and made
available for the uses of agriculture. The improvement
may be conveniently considered under three heads:—
First—The exclusion of the sea water.
Second—The removal of the causes of inundation from
the upland.
Third—The removal of the rain-fall and water of filtration.
The Exclusion of the Sea is of the first importance,
because not only does it saturate the land with water,—but
this water, being salt, renders it unfertile for the
plants of ordinary cultivation, and causes it to produce
others which are of little, or no value.
The only means by which the sea may be kept out is,
by building such dykes or embankments as shut out the
highest tides, and, on shores which are exposed to the action
of the waves, will resist their force. Ordinarily, the
best, because the cheapest, material of which these embankments
can be made, is the soil of the marsh itself.
This is rarely,—almost never,—a pure peat, such as is
found in upland swamps; it contains a large proportion of
sand, blue clay, muscle mud, or other earthy deposits, which
give it great weight and tenacity, and render it excellent
for forming the body of the dyke. On lands which are
overflowed to a considerable extent at each high tide,
(twice a day,) it will be necessary to adopt more expensive,
and more effective measures, but on ordinary salt meadows,
which are deeply covered only at the spring tides, (occurring
every month,) the following plan will be found practical
and economical.
Locating the line of the embankment far enough back
from the edge of the meadow to leave an ample flat outside
of it to break the force of the waves, if on the open
coast, or to resist the inroads of the current if on the bank
of an estuary or a river,—say from ten to one hundred
yards, according to the danger of encroachment,—set a
row of stakes parallel to the general direction of the shore,
to mark the outside line of the base of the dyke. Stake
out the inside line at such distance as will give a pitch or
inclination to the slopes of one and a half to one on the
outside, and of one to one on the inside, and will allow
the necessary width at the top, which should be at least
two feet higher than the level of the highest tide that is
known ever to have occurred at that place. The width
of the top should never be less than four feet, and in exposed
localities it should be more. If a road will be needed
around the land, it is best, if a heavy dyke is required, to
make it wide enough to answer this purpose, with still
wider places, at intervals, to allow vehicles to turn or to pass
each other. Ordinarily, however, especially if there be a
good stretch of flat meadow in front, the top of the dyke
need not be more than four feet wide. Supposing such a
dyke to be contemplated where the water has been known
to rise two feet above the level of the meadows, requiring
an embankment four feet high, it will be necessary to allow
for the base a width of fourteen feet;—four feet for
the width of the top, six feet for the reach of the front
slope, (1-1/2 to 1,) and four feet for the reach of the back
slope, (1 to 1.)
Having staked out two parallel lines, fourteen feet apart,
and erected, at intervals of twenty or thirty feet, frames
made of rough strips of board of the exact shape of the
section of the proposed embankment, the workmen may
remove the sod to a depth of six inches, laying it all on
the outside of the position of the proposed embankment.
The sod from the line of the ditch, from which the earth
for the embankment is to be taken, should also be removed
and placed with the other. This ditch should be always
inside of the dyke, where it will never be exposed to the
action of the sea. It should be, at the surface, broader
than the base of the dyke, and five feet deep in the center,
but its sides may slope from the surface of the ground directly
to the center line of the bottom. This is the best
form to give it, because, while it should be five feet deep,
for future uses as a drain, its bottom need have no width.
The great width at the surface will give such a pitch to
the banks as to ensure their stability, and will yield a large
amount of sod for the facing of the dyke. The edge of
this ditch should be some feet away from the inner line of
the embankment, leaving it a firm support or shoulder at
the original level of the ground, the sod not being removed
from the interval. The next step in the work should
be to throw, or wheel, the material from the ditch on to
the place which has been stripped for the dyke, building
it up so as to conform exactly to the profile frames,
these remaining in their places, to indicate the filling necessary
to make up for the settling of the material, as the
water drains out of it.
Fig. 47 - DYKE AND DITCH.
Fig. 47 - DYKE AND DITCH.
As fast as a permanent shape can be given to the outer
face of the dyke, it should be finished by having the sod
placed against it, being laid flatwise, one on top of another,
(like stone work,) in the most solid manner possible.
This should be continued to the top of the slope, and the
flat top of the dyke should also be sodded,—the sods on
the top, and on the slope, being firmly beaten to their places
with the back of the spade or other suitable implement.
This will sufficiently protect the exposed parts of the work
against the action of any waves that may be formed on
the flat between the dyke and the deep water, while the
inner slope and the banks of the ditch, not being exposed
to masses of moving water, will retain their shape and
will soon be covered with a new growth.
The ends of the work, while the operations are suspended during
spring tides, will need an extra protection of sods, but that lying out of
reach of the eddies that will be formed by the receding water will not be
materially affected.
A sectional
view of the above described dyke and ditch is shown in
the accompanying diagram, (Fig. 47.)
In all work of this character, it is important to regulate
the amount of work laid out to be done between the
spring tides, to the laboring force employed, so that no unfinished
work will remain to be submerged and injured.
When the flood comes, it should find everything finished
up and protected against its ravages, so that no part of it
need be done over again.
If the land is crossed by creeks, the dyke should be finished
off and sodded, a little back from each bank, and
when the time comes for closing the channel, sufficient
force should be employed to complete the dam at a single
tide, so that the returning flow shall not enter to wash
away the material which has been thrown in.
If, as is often the case, these creeks are not merely tidal
estuaries, but receive brooks or rivers from the upland,
provision must be made, as will be hereafter directed, for
either diverting the upland flow, or for allowing it to pass
out at low water, through valve gates or sluices. When
the dam has been made, the water behind it should never
be allowed to rise to nearly the level of the full tide, and,
as soon as possible, grass and willows should be grown on
the bank, to add to its strength by the binding effect of
their roots.
When the dyke is completed across the front of the
whole flat,—from the high land on one side to the high
land on the other, the creeks should be closed, one after
the other, commencing with the smallest, so that the experience
gained in their treatment may enable the force
to work more advantageously on those which carry more
water.
If the flow of water in the creek is considerable, a row
of strong stakes, or piles, should be firmly driven into the
bottom mud, across the whole width of the channel, at intervals
of not more than one or two feet, and fascines,—bundles
of brush bound together,—should be made ready
on the banks, in sufficient quantity to close the spaces between
the piles. These will serve to prevent the washing
away of the filling during construction. The pile driving,
and the preparation of the fascines may be done before
the closing of the channel with earth is commenced, and
if upland clay or gravel, to be mixed with the local material,
can be economically brought to the place by boats or
wagons, it will be an advantage. Everything being in
readiness, a sufficient force of laborers to finish the dam in
six hours should commence the work a little before dead
low-water, and, (with the aid of wheelbarrows, if necessary,)
throw the earth in rapidly behind the row of stakes
and fascines, giving the dam sufficient width to resist the
pressure of the water from without, and keeping the work
always in advance of the rising of the tide, so that, during
the whole operation, none of the filling shall be washed
away by water flowing over its top.
If the creek has a sloping bottom, the work may be
commenced earlier,—as soon as the tide commences to recede,—and
pushed out to the center of the channel by the
time the tide is out. When the dam is built, it will be
best to heavily sod, or otherwise protect its surface against
the action of heavy rains, which would tend to wash it
away and weaken it; and the bed of the creek should be
filled in back of the dam for a distance of at least fifty
yards, to a height greater than that at which water will
stand in the interior drains,—say to within three feet of
the surface,—so that there shall never be a body of water
standing within that distance of the dam.
This is a necessary precaution against the attacks of muskrats,
which are the principal cause of the insecurity of all
salt marsh embankments. It should be a cardinal rule
with all who are engaged in the construction of such
works, never to allow two bodies of water, one on each
side of the bank to be nearer than twenty-five yards of each
other, and fifty yards would be better. Muskrats do not
bore through a bank, as is often supposed, to make a passage
from one body of water to another, (they would find
an easier road over the top); but they delight in any elevated
mound in which they can make their homes above
the water level and have its entrance beneath the surface,
so that their land enemies cannot invade them. When
they enter for this purpose, only from one side of the dyke,
they will do no harm, but if another colony is, at the same
time, boring in from the other side, there is great danger
that their burrows will connect, and thus form a channel for
the admission of water, and destroy the work. A disregard
of this requirement has caused thousands of acres of
salt marsh that had been enclosed by dykes having a
ditch on each side, (much the cheapest way to make them,)
to be abandoned, and it has induced the invention of various
costly devices for the protection of embankments
against these attacks.
The latest invention of this sort, is that of a series of cast iron plates,
set on edge, riveted together, and driven in to such a depth as to reach
from the top of the dyke to a point below low-water mark. The best
that can be said of this plan is, that its adoption would do no harm. Unless
the plates are driven deeply into the clay underlying the permeable
soil, (and this is sometimes very deep,) they would not prevent the
slight infiltration of water which could pass under them as well as
through any other part of the soil, and unless the iron were very thick,
the corrosive action of salt water would soon so honeycomb it that the
borers would easily penetrate it; but the great objection to the use of
these plates is, that they would be very costly and ineffectual. A dyke,
made as described above, of the material of the locality, having a ditch
only on the inside, and being well sodded on its outer face, would be far
cheaper and better.
When the creek or estuary to be cut off is very wide,
the embankment may be carried out, at leisure, from each
side, until the channel is only wide enough to allow the
passage of the tide without too great a rush of water
against the unfinished ends of the work; but, even in these
cases, there will be economy in the use of fascines and piles
from the first, or of stones if these can be readily procured.
In wide streams, partial obstructions of the water
course will sometimes induce the deposit of silt in such
quantities as will greatly assist the work. No written description
of a single process will suffice for the direction
of those having charge of this most delicate of all drainage
operations. Much must be left to the ingenuity of
the director of the work, who will have to avail himself
of the assistance of such favorable circumstances as may,
in the case in hand, offer themselves.
If the barrier to be built will require a considerable outlay,
it should be placed in the hands of a competent engineer,
and it will generally demand the full measure of his
skill and experience.
The work cannot be successful, unless the whole line of
the water-front is protected by a continuous bank, sufficiently
high and strong in all of its parts to resist the action
of the highest tides and the strongest waves to which
it will be subjected. As it is always open to inspection, at
each ebb tide, and can always be approached for repair, it
will be easy to keep it in good condition; and, if properly
attended to, it will become more solid and effective with
age.
The removal of the causes of inundation from the upland
is often of almost equal importance with the shutting
out of the sea, since the amount of water brought down
by rivers, brooks, and hill-side wash, is often more than
can be removed by any practicable means, by sluice gates,
or pumps.
It will be quite enough for the capacity of these means
of drainage, to remove the rain-water which falls on the
flat land, and that which reaches it by under-ground
springs and by infiltration,—its proper drainage-water in
short,—without adding that which, coming from a higher
level, may be made to flow off by its own fall.
Catch-water drains, near the foot of the upland, may be
so arranged as to receive the surface water of the hills and
carry it off, always on a level above that of the top of the
embankment, and these drains may often be, with advantage,
enlarged to a sufficient capacity to carry the streams
as well. If the marsh is divided by an actual river, it
may be best to embank it in two separate tracts; losing
the margins, that have been recommended, outside of
the dykes, and building the necessary additional length
of these, rather than to contend with a large body of water.
But, frequently, a very large marsh is traversed by a
tortuous stream which occupies a large area, and which,
although the tidal water which it contains gives it the appearance
of a river, is only the outlet of an insignificant
stream, which might be carried along the edge of the upland
in an ordinary mill-race. In such case it is better to
divert the stream and reclaim the whole area.
When a stream is enclosed between dykes, its winding
course should be made straight in order that its water may
be carried off as rapidly as possible, and the land which it
occupies by its deviations, made available for cultivation.
In the loose, silty soil of a salt marsh, the stream may be
made to do most of the work of making its new bed, by
constructing temporary "jetties," or other obstructions to
its accustomed flow, which shall cause its current to deposit
silt in its old channel, and to cut a new one out of the
opposite bank. In some instances it may be well to make an
elevated canal, straight across the tract, by constructing
banks high enough to confine the stream and deliver it
over the top of the dyke; in others it may be more expedient
to carry the stream over, or through, the hill which
bounds the marsh, and cause it to discharge through an
adjoining valley. Improvements of this magnitude, which
often affect the interest of many owners, or of persons interested
in the navigation of the old channel, or in mill
privileges below the point at which the water course is to
be diverted, will generally require legislative interference.
But they not seldom promise immense advantages for a
comparatively small outlay.
The instance cited of the Hackensack Meadows, in New
Jersey, is a case in point. Its area is divided among many
owners, and, while ninety-nine acres in every hundred are
given up to muskrats, mosquitoes, coarse rushes and
malaria, the other one acre may belong to the owner of an
adjacent farm who values the salt hay which it yields him,
and the title to the whole is vested in many individual
proprietors, who could never be induced to unite in an improvement
for the common benefit. Then again, thanks
to the tide that sets back in the Hackensack River, it is
able to float an occasional vessel to the unimportant villages
at the northern end of the meadows, and the right
of navigation can be interfered with only by governmental
action. If the Hackensack River proper, that part of it
which only serves as an outlet for the drainage of the high
land north of the meadows, could be diverted and carried
through the hills to the Passaic; or confined within straight
elevated banks and made to discharge at high water mark
at the line of the Philadelphia Rail-road;—the wash of
the highlands, east and west of the meadows, being also
carried off at this level,—the bridge of the railroad might
be replaced by an earth embankment, less than a quarter
of a mile in length, effecting a complete exclusion of the
tidal flow from the whole tract.
This being done, a steam-pump, far less formidable than
many which are in profitable use in Europe for the same
purpose, would empty, and keep empty, the present bed
of the river, which would form a capital outlet for the
drainage of the whole area. Twenty thousand acres, of
the most fertile land, would thus be added to the available
area of the State, greatly increasing its wealth, and inducing
the settlement of thousands of industrious inhabitants.
As the circumstances under which upland water reaches
lands of the class under consideration vary with every
locality, no specific directions for the treatment of individual
cases can be given within the limits of this chapter;
but the problem will rarely be a difficult one.
The removal of the rain-fall and water of filtration
is the next point to be considered.
So far as the drainage of the land, in detail, is concerned,
it is only necessary to say that it may be accomplished, as
in the case of any other level land which, from the slight
fall that can be allowed the drains, requires close attention
and great care in the adjustment of the grades.
The main difficulty is in providing an outlet for the
drains. This can only be done by artificial means, as the
water must be removed from a level lower than high-water
mark,—sometimes lower than low-water.
If it is only required that the outlet be at a point somewhat
above the level of ordinary low-water, it will be sufficient
to provide a sufficient reservoir, (usually a large
open ditch,) to contain the drainage water that is discharged
while the tide stands above the floor of the outlet
sluice-way, and to provide for its outflow while the
level of the tide water is below the point of discharge.
This is done by means of sluices having self-acting valves,
(or tide-gates,) opening outward, which will be closed by
the weight of the water when the tide rises against them,
being opened again by the pressure of the water from
within, as soon the tide falls below the level of the water
inside of the bank.
The gates and sluices may be of wood or iron,—square
or round. The best would be galvanized iron pipes and
valves; but a square wooden trunk, closed with a heavy
oak gate that fits closely against its outer end, and moves
freely on its hinges, will answer capitally well, if carefully
and strongly made. If the gate is of wood, it will be
well to have it lie in a slightly slanting position, so that its
own weight will tend to keep it closed when the tide first
commences to rise above the floor, and might trickle in,
before it had acquired sufficient head to press the gate
against the end of the trunk.
As this outlet has to remove, in a short time, all of the
water that is delivered by the drains and ditches during
several hours, it should, of course, be considerably larger
than would be required for a constantly flowing drain from
the same area; but the immense gates,—large enough for
a canal lock,—which are sometimes used for the drainage
of a few acres of marsh, are absurd. Not only are they
useless, they are really objectionable, inasmuch as the
greater extent of their joints increases the risk of leakage
at the time of high water.
The channel for the outflow of the water may sometimes,
with advantage, be open to the top of the dyke or
dam,—a canal instead of a trunk; but this is rarely the
better plan, and is only admissible where the discharge is
into a river or small bay, too small for the formation of
high waves, as these would be best received on the face
of a well sodded, sloping bank.
The height, above absolute low water, at which the outlet
should be placed, will depend on the depth of the outlet
of the land drain, and the depth of storage room required
to receive the drainage water during the higher stages of
the tide. Of course, it must not be higher than the floor
of the land drain outlet, and, except for the purpose of
affording storage room, it need not be lower, although all
the drainage will discharge, not only while the tide water
is below the bottom of the gate, but as long as it remains
lower than the level of the water inside. It is well to place
the mouth of the trunk nearly as low as ordinary low-water
mark. This will frequently render it necessary to carry
a covered drain, of wood or brick, through the mud, out
as far as the tide usually recedes,—connected with the
valve gate at the outlet of the trunk, by a covered box
which will keep rubbish from obstructing it, or interfering
with its action.
When the outlet of the land-drains is below low-water
mark, it is of course necessary to pump out the drainage
water. This is done by steam or by wind, the latter being
economical only for small tracts which will not bear
the cost of a steam pump. Formerly, this work was done
entirely by windmills, but these afford only an uncertain
power, and often cause the entire loss of crops which are
ready for the harvest, by obstinately refusing to work for
days after a heavy rain has deluged the land. In grass
land they are tolerably reliable, and on small tracts in
cultivation, it is easy, by having a good proportion of
open ditches, to afford storage room sufficient for general
security; but in the reclaiming of large areas, (and it is
with these that the work is most economical,) the steam
pump may be regarded as indispensable. It is fast superseding
the windmills which, a few years ago, were the sole
dependence in Holland and on the English Fens. The
magnitude of the pumping machinery on which the agriculture
of a large part of Holland depends, is astonishing.
There are such immense areas of salt marsh in the
United States which may be tolerably drained by the use
of simple valve gates, discharging above low-water mark,
that it is not very important to consider the question of
pumping, except in cases where owners of small tracts,
from which a sufficient tidal outlet could not be secured,
(without the concurrence of adjoining proprietors who
might refuse to unite in making the improvement,) may
find it advisable to erect small pumps for their own use.
In such cases, it would generally be most economical to
use wind-power, especially if an accessory steam pump be
provided for occasional use, in emergency. Certainly, the
tidal drainage should first be resorted to, for when the
land has once been brought into cultivation, the propriety
of introducing steam pumps will become more apparent,
and the outlay will be made with more confidence of profitable
return, and, in all cases, the tidal outlet should be
depended on for the outflow of all water above its level.
It would be folly to raise water by expensive means, which
can be removed, even periodically, by natural drainage.
When pumps are used, their discharge pipes should pass
through the embankment, and deliver the water at low-water
mark, so that the engine may have to operate only
against the actual height of the tide water. If it delivered
above high-water mark, it would work, even at low tide,
against a constant head, equal to that of the highest tides.
CHAPTER X. - MALARIAL DISEASES.
So far as remote agricultural districts are concerned, it
is not probable that the mere question of health would induce
the undertaking of costly drainage operations, although
this consideration may operate, in connection with
the need for an improved condition of soil, as a strong
argument in its favor. As a rule, "the chills" are accepted
by farmers, especially at the West, as one of the slight
inconveniences attending their residence on rich lands;
and it is not proposed, in this work, to urge the evils of
this terrible disease, and of "sun pain," or "day neuralgia,"
as a reason for draining the immense prairies over which
they prevail. The diseases exist,—to the incalculable detriment
of the people,—and thorough draining would remove
them, and would doubtless bring a large average return
on the investment;—but the question is, after all,
one of capital; and the cost of such draining as would
remove fever-and-ague from the bottom lands and prairies
of the West, and from the infected agricultural districts
at the East, would be more than the agricultural capital
of those districts could spare for the purpose.
In the vicinity of cities and towns, however, where
more wealth has accumulated, and where the number of
persons subjected to the malarial influence is greater, there
can be no question as to the propriety of draining, even
if nothing but improved health be the object.
Then again, there are immense tracts near the large
cities of this country which would be most desirable for
residence, were it not that their occupancy, except with
certain constant precautions, implies almost inevitable suffering
from fever-and-ague, or neuralgia.
Very few neighborhoods within thirty miles of the city
of New York are entirely free from these scourges, whose
influence has greatly retarded their occupation by those
who are seeking country homes; while many, who have
braved the dangers of disease in these localities, have had
sad cause to regret their temerity.
Probably the most striking instance of the effect of
malaria on the growth and settlement of suburban districts,
is to be found on Staten Island. Within five miles
of the Battery; accessible by the most agreeable and best
managed ferry from the city; practically, nearer to Wall
street than Murray Hill is; with most charming views of
land and water; with a beautifully diversified surface, and
an excellent soil; and affording capital opportunities for sea
bathing, it should be, (were it not for its sanitary reputation,
it inevitably would be,) one vast residence-park. Except
on its extreme northern end, and along its higher
ridges, it has,—and, unfortunately, it deserves,—a most unenviable
reputation for insalubrity. Here and there, on the
southern slope also, there are favored places which are unaccountably
free from the pest, but, as a rule, it is, during the
summer and autumn, unsafe to live there without having
constant recourse to preventive medication, or exercising
unusual and inconvenient precautions with regard to exposure
to mid-day sun and evening dew. There are always
to be found attractive residences, which are deserted by
their owners, and are offered for sale at absurdly low prices.
There are isolated instances of very thorough and very
costly draining, which has failed of effect, because so extensive
a malarial region cannot be reclaimed by anything
short of a systematic improvement of the whole.
It has been estimated that the thorough drainage of the
low lands, valleys and ponds of the eastern end of the
island, including two miles of the south shore, would at
once add $5,000,000 to the market value of the real estate
of that section. There can be no question that any radical
improvement in this respect would remove the only obstacle
to the rapid settlement of the island by those who
wish to live in the country, yet need to be near to the
business portion of the city. The hope of such improvement
being made, however, seems as remote as ever,—although
any one at all acquainted with the sources of miasm,
in country neighborhoods, can readily see the cause
of the difficulty, and the means for its removal are as
plainly suggested.
Staten Island is, by no means, alone in this respect. All
who know the history of the settlement of the other suburbs
of New York are very well aware that those places
which are free from fever-and-ague and malarial neuralgia,
are extremely rare.
The exact cause of fever-and-ague and other malarial
diseases is unknown, but it is demonstrated that, whatever
the cause is, it is originated under a combination of circumstances,
one of which is undue moisture in the soil.
It is not necessary that land should be absolutely marshy
to produce the miasm, for this often arises on cold, springy
uplands which are quite free from deposits of muck.
Thus far, the attention of scientific investigators, given
to the consideration of the origin of malarial diseases, has
failed to discover any well established facts concerning it;
but there have been developed certain theories, which
seem to be sustained by such knowledge as exists on the
subject.
Dr. Bartlett, in his work on the Fevers of the United
States, says:—"The essential, efficient, producing cause
of periodical fever,—the poison whose action on
the system gives rise to the disease,—is a substance or
agent which has received the names of malaria, or marsh
miasm. The nature and composition of this poison are
wholly unknown to us. Like most other analogous
agents, like the contagious principle of small-pox and of
typhus, and like the epidemic poison of scarletina and
cholera, they are too subtle to be recognized by any
of our senses, they are too fugitive to be caught by any
of our contrivances.
"As always happens in such cases and under similar
circumstances, in the absence of positive knowledge, we
have been abundantly supplied with conjecture and speculation;
what observation has failed to discover, hypothesis
has endeavored and professed to supply. It is
quite unnecessary even to enumerate the different substances
to which malaria has been referred. Amongst
them are all of the chemical products and compounds
possible in wet and marshy localities; moisture alone;
the products of animal and vegetable decomposition;
and invisible living organisms. * * * * Inscrutable,
however, as the intimate nature of the substances
or agents may be, there are some few of its laws and
relations which are very well ascertained. One of these
consists in its connection with low, or wet, or marshy
localities. This connection is not invariable and exclusive,
that is, there are marshy localities which are not
malarious, and there are malarious localities which are
not marshy; but there is no doubt whatever that it generally
exists."
In a report to the United States Sanitary Commission,
Dr. Metcalfe states, that all hypotheses, even the most
plausible, are entirely unsupported by positive knowledge,
and he says:—
"This confession of ignorance still leaves us in possession
of certain knowledge concerning malaria, from which
much practical good may be derived.
"1st. It affects, by preference, low and moist localities.
"2d. It is almost never developed at a lower temperature
than 60° Fahrenheit.
"3d. Its evolution or active agency is checked by a
temperature of 32°.
"4th. It is most abundant and most virulent as we approach
the equator and the sea-coast.
"5th. It has an affinity for dense foliage, which has the
power of accumulating it, when lying in the course of
winds blowing from malarious localities.
"6th. Forests, or even woods, have the power of obstructing
and preventing its transmission, under these
circumstances.
"7th. By atmospheric currents it is capable of being
transported to considerable distances—probably as far as
five miles.
"8th. It may be developed, in previously healthy places,
by turning up the soil; as in making excavations for
foundations of houses, tracks for railroads, and beds for
canals.
"9th. In certain cases it seems to be attracted and absorbed
by bodies of water lying in the course of such
winds as waft it from the miasmatic source.
"10th. Experience alone can enable us to decide as to
the presence or absence of malaria, in any given locality.
"11th. In proportion as countries, previously malarious,
are cleared up and thickly settled, periodical fevers disappear—in
many instances to be replaced by the typhoid
or typhus."
La Roche, in a carefully prepared treatise on "Pneumonia;
its Supposed Connection with Autumnal Fevers," recites
various theories concerning the mode of action of
marsh miasm, and finds them insufficient to account for
the phenomena which they produce. He continues as
follows:—
"All the above hypotheses failing to account for the effects
in question, we are naturally led to the admission
that they are produced by the morbific influence of some
special agent; and when we take into consideration all
the circumstances attending the appearance of febrile
diseases, the circumscribed sphere of their prevalence,
the suddenness of their attack, the character of their
phenomena, etc., we may safely say that there is nothing
left but to attribute them to the action of some
poison dissolved or suspended in the air of the infected
locality; which poison, while doubtless requiring for its
development and dissemination a certain degree of heat,
and terrestrial and atmospheric moisture, a certain
amount of nightly condensation after evaporation, and
the presence of fermenting or decomposing materials,
cannot be produced by either of these agencies alone,
and though indicated by the chemist, betrays its presence
by producing on those exposed to its influence the
peculiar morbid changes characterizing fever."
He quotes the following from the Researches of Dr.
Chadwick:—
"In considering the circumstances external to the residence,
which affect the sanitary condition of the population,
the importance of a general land-drainage is developed
by the inquiries as to the cause of the prevalent
diseases, to be of a magnitude of which no conception had
been formed at the commencement of the investigation.
Its importance is manifested by the severe consequences
of its neglect in every part of the country, as well as by
its advantages in the increasing salubrity and productiveness
wherever the drainage has been skillful and effectual."
La Roche calls attention to these facts:—That the acclimated
residents of a malarious locality, while they are
less subject than strangers to active fever, show, in their
physical and even in their mental organization, evident
indications of the ill effects of living in a poisonous atmosphere,—an
evil which increases with successive generations,
often resulting in a positive deterioration of the
race; that the lower animals are affected, though in a less
degree than man; that deposits of organic matter which
are entirely covered with water, (as at the bottom of a
pond,) are not productive of malaria; that this condition
of saturation is infinitely preferable to imperfect drainage;
that swamps which are shaded from the sun's heat by
trees, are not supposed to produce disease; and that
marshes which are exposed to constant winds are not
especially deleterious to persons living in their immediate
vicinity,—while winds frequently carry the emanations of
miasmatic districts to points some miles distant, where
they produce their worst effects. This latter statement is
substantiated by the fact that houses situated some miles
to the leeward of low, wet lands, have been especially insalubrious
until the windows and doors on the side toward
the source of the miasm were closed up, and openings
made on the other side,—and thenceforth remained free
from the disease, although other houses with openings on
the exposed sides continued unhealthy.
The literature relating to periodical fevers contains nothing
else so interesting as the very ingenious article of Dr. J.
H. Salisbury, on the "Cause of Malarious Fevers," contributed
to the "American Journal of Medical Science," for
January, 1866. Unfortunately, while there is no evidence
to controvert the statements of this article, they do not
seem to be honored with the confidence of the profession,—not
being regarded as sufficiently authenticated to form a
basis for scientific deductions. Dr. Salisbury claims to have
discovered the cause of malarial fever in the spores of a very
low order of plant, which spores he claims to have invariably
detected in the saliva, and in the urine, of fever patients,
and in those of no other persons, and which he collected
on plates of glass suspended over all marshes and
other lands of a malarious character, which he examined,
and which he was never able to obtain from lands which
were not malarious. Starting from this point, he proceeds,
(with circumstantial statements that seem to the unprofessional
mind to be sufficient,) to show that the plant producing
these spores is always found, in the form of a whitish,
green, or brick-colored incrustation, on the surface of
fever producing lands; that the spores, when detached
from the parent plant, are carried in suspension only in
the moist exhalations of wet lands, never rising higher,
(usually from 35 to 60 feet,) nor being carried farther, than
the humid air itself; that they most accumulate in the upper
strata of the fogs, producing more disease on lands
slightly elevated above the level of the marsh than at its
very edge; that fever-and-ague are never to be found
where this plant does not grow; that it may be at once
introduced into the healthiest locality by transporting
moist earth on which the incrustation is forming; that the
plant, being introduced into the human system through
the lungs, continues to grow there and causes disease;
and that quinia arrests its growth, (as it checks the multiplication
of yeast plants in fermentation,) and thus suspends
the action of the disease.
Probably it would be impossible to prove that the foregoing
theory is correct, though it is not improbable that it
contains the germ from which a fuller knowledge of the disease
and its causes will be obtained. It is sufficient for
the purposes of this work to say that, so far as Dr. Salisbury's
opinion is valuable, it is,—like the opinion of all
other writers on the subject,—fully in favor of perfect
drainage as the one great preventive of all malarial diseases.
The evidence of the effect of drainage in removing the
cause of malarial diseases is complete and conclusive. Instances
of such improvement in this country are not rare,
but they are much less numerous and less conspicuous
here than in England, where draining has been much more
extensively carried out, and where greater pains have been
taken to collect testimony as to its effects.
If there is any fact well established by satisfactory experience,
it is that thorough and judicious draining will
entirely remove the local source of the miasm which produces
these diseases.
The voluminous reports of various Committees of the
English Parliament, appointed to investigate sanitary
questions, are replete with information concerning experience
throughout the whole country, bearing directly on
this question.
Dr. Whitley, in his report to the Board of Health, (in
1864,) of an extended tour of observation, says of one
town that he examined:—
"Mr. Nicholls, who has been forty years in practice
here, and whom I was unable to see at the time of my
visit, writes: Intermittent and remittent are greatly on
the decline since the improved state of drainage of
the town and surrounding district, and more particularly
marked is this alteration, since the introduction of the
water-works in the place. Although we have occasional
outbreaks of intermittent and remittent, with neuralgic
attacks, they yield more speedily to remedies, and are
not attended by so much enlargement of the liver or
spleen as formerly, and dysentery is of rare occurrence."
Dr. Whitley sums up his case as follows:—
"It would appear from the foregoing inquiry, that intermittent
and remittent fevers, and their consequences,
can no longer be regarded as seriously affecting the
health of the population, in many of the districts, in which
those diseases were formerly of a formidable character.
Thus, in Norfolk, Lincolnshire, and Cambridgeshire,
counties in which these diseases were both frequent and
severe, all the evidence, except that furnished by the
Peterborough Infirmary, and, in a somewhat less degree,
in Spaulding, tends to show that they are at the present
time, comparatively rare and mild in form."
He mentions similar results from his investigations in
other parts of the kingdom, and says:—
"It may, therefore, be safely asserted as regards England
generally, that:—
"The diseases which have been made the subject of the
present inquiry, have been steadily decreasing, both in
frequency and severity, for several years, and this decrease
is attributed, in nearly every case, mainly to one
cause,—improved land drainage;" again:
"The change of local circumstances, unanimously declared
to be the most immediate in influencing the prevalence
of malarious diseases, is land drainage;" and
again:
"Except in a few cases in which medical men believed
that these affections began to decline previously to the
improved drainage of the places mentioned, the decrease
in all of the districts where extensive drainage has been
carried out, was stated to have commenced about the
same time, and was unhesitatingly attributed to that
cause."
A select Committee of the House of Commons, appointed
to investigate the condition and sanitary influence
of the Thames marshes, reported their minutes of evidence,
and their deductions therefrom, in 1854, The following
is extracted from their report:
"It appears from the evidence of highly intelligent and
eminent gentlemen of the medical profession, residing in
the neighborhood of the marshes on both sides of the
Thames below London Bridge, that the diseases prevalent
in these districts are highly indicative of malarious
influences, fever-and-ague being very prevalent; and
that the sickness and mortality are greatest in those localities
which adjoin imperfectly drained lands, and far
exceed the usual average; and that ague and allied disorders
frequently extend to the high grounds in the vicinity.
In those districts where a partial drainage has
been effected, a corresponding improvement in the health
of the inhabitants is perceptible."
In the evidence given before the committee, Dr. P.
Bossey testified that the malaria from salt marshes varied
in intensity, being most active in the morning and in the
Summer season. The marshes are sometimes covered by
a little fog, usually not more than three feet thick,
which is of a very offensive odor, and detrimental to
health. Away from the marshes, there is a greater tendency
to disease on the side toward which the prevailing
winds blow.
Dr. James Stewart testified that the effect of malaria
was greatest when very hot weather succeeds heavy rain
or floods. He thought that malaria could be carried up
a slope, but has never been known to descend, and that,
consequently, an intervening hill affords sufficient protection
against marsh malaria. He had known cases where
the edges of a river were healthy and the uplands malarious.
In Santa Maura and Zante, where he had been stationed
with the army, he had observed that the edge of a marsh
would be comparatively healthy, while the higher places
in the vicinity were exceedingly unhealthy. He thought
that there were a great many mixed diseases which began
like ague and terminated very differently; those diseases
would, no doubt, assume a very different form if they
were not produced by the marsh air; many diseases are
very difficult to treat, from being of a mixed character
beginning like marsh fevers and terminating like inflammatory
fevers, or diseases of the chest.
Dr. George Farr testified that rheumatism and tic-doloreux
were very common among the ladies who live at the
Woolwich Arsenal, near the Thames marshes. Some of
these cases were quite incurable, until the patients removed
to a purer atmosphere.
W. H. Gall, M. D., thought that the extent to which
malaria affected the health of London, must of course be
very much a theoretical question; "but it is very remarkable
that diseases which are not distinctly miasmatic, do
become much more severe in a miasmatic district. Influenzas,
which prevailed in England in 1847, were very
much more fatal in London and the surrounding parts
than they were in the country generally, and influenza
and ague poisons are very nearly allied in their effects.
Marsh miasms are conveyed, no doubt, a considerable
distance. Sufficiently authentic cases are recorded to
show that the influence of marsh miasm extends several
miles." Other physicians testify to the fact, that near
the Thames marshes, the prevalent diseases are all of them
of an aguish type, intermittent and remittent, and that
they are accompanied with much dysentery. Dr. John
Manly said that, when he first went to Barking, he found a
great deal of ague, but since the draining, in a population
of ten thousand, there are not half-a-dozen cases annually
and but very little remittent.
The following Extract is taken from the testimony
of Sir Culling Eardly, Bart.:
"Chairman:—I believe you reside at Belvidere, in the
parish of Erith?—Yes.—Ch.: Close to these marshes?—Yes.—Ch.:
Can you speak from your own knowledge,
of the state of these marshes, with regard to public
health?—Sir C.: I can speak of some of the results
which have been produced in the neighborhood, from the
condition of the marshes; the neighborhood is in one
continual state of ague. My own house is protected, from
the height of its position, and a gentleman's house is less
liable to the influence of malaria than the houses of the
lower classes. But even in my house we are liable to
ague; and to show the extraordinary manner in which
the ague operates, in the basement story of this house
where my men-servants sleep, we have more than once
had bad ague. In the attics of my house, where my
maid-servants sleep, we have never had it. Persons are
deterred from settling in the neighborhood by the aguish
character of the country. Many persons, attracted
by the beauty of the locality, wish to come down and
settle; but when they find the liability to ague, they
are compelled to give up their intention. I may mention
that the village of Erith itself, bears marks of the influence
of malaria. It is more like one of the desolate
towns of Italy, Ferrara, for instance, than a healthy,
happy, English village. I do not know whether it is
known to the committee, that Erith is the village described
in Dickens' Household Words, as Dumble-down-deary,
and that it is a most graphic and correct description
of the state of the place, attributable to the unhealthy
character of the locality."
He also stated that the ague is not confined to the
marshes, but extends to the high lands near them.
The General Board of Health, of England, at the close
of a voluminous report, publish the following "Conclusions
as to the Drainage of Suburban Lands:—
"1. Excess of moisture, even on lands not evidently wet,
is a cause of fogs and damps.
"2. Dampness serves as a medium for the conveyance of
any decomposing matter that may be evolved, and adds
to the injurious effects of such matters in the air:—in
other words the excess of moisture may be said to increase
or aggravate atmospheric impurities.
"3. The evaporation of the surplus moisture lowers the
temperature, produces chills, and creates or aggravates
the sudden and injurious changes or fluctuations by
which health is injured."
In view of the foregoing opinions as to the cause of malaria,
and of the evidence as to the effect of draining in removing
the unhealthy condition in which those causes
originate, it is not too much to say that,—in addition to
the capital effect of draining on the productive capacity of
the land,—the most beneficial sanitary results may be confidently
expected from the extension of the practice, especially
in such localities as are now unsafe, or at least
undesirable for residence.
In proportion to the completeness and efficiency of the
means for the removal of surplus water from the soil:—in
proportion, that is, to the degree in which the improved
tile drainage described in these pages is adopted,—will be
the completeness of the removal of the causes of disease.
So far as the drying of malarious lands is concerned, it is
only necessary to construct drains in precisely the same
manner as for agricultural improvement.
The removal of the waste of houses, and of other filth,
will be considered in the next chapter.
CHAPTER XI. - HOUSE DRAINAGE AND TOWN SEWERAGE IN
THEIR RELATIONS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH.
The following is extracted from a report made by the
General Board of Health to the British Parliament, concerning
the administration of the Public Health Act and
the Nuisances Removal and Diseases Prevention Acts
from 1848 to 1854.
"Where instances have been favorable for definite observation,
as in broad blocks of buildings, the effects of
sanitary improvement have been already manifested to an
extent greater than could have been anticipated, and than
can be readily credited by those who have not paid attention
to the subject.
"In one favorable instance, that of between 600 and 700
persons of the working class in the metropolis, during a
period of three years, the average rate of mortality has
been reduced to between 13 and 14 in 1000. In another
instance, for a shorter period, among 500 persons, the
mortality has been reduced as low as even 7 in 1000.
The average rate of mortality for the whole metropolis
being 23 in 1000.
"In another instance, the abolishing of cess-pools and
their replacement by water-closets, together with the
abolishing of brick drains and their replacement by impermeable
and self-cleansing stone-ware pipes, has been
attended with an immediate and extraordinary reduction
of mortality. Thus, in Lambeth Square, occupied by a
superior class of operatives, in the receipt of high wages,
the deaths, which in ordinary times were above the general
average, or more than 30 in 1000, had risen to a rate
of 55 in 1000. By the abolishing of cess-pools, which
were within the houses, and the substitution of water-closets,
and with the introduction of tubular, self-cleansing
house-drains, the mortality has been reduced to 13 in 1000.
"The reduction of the mortality was effected precisely
among the same occupants, without any change in their
habits whatever."
"Sewers are less important than the House-Drains and
Water-Closets, and if not carrying much water, may become
cess-pools. In the case of the Square just referred
to, when cess-pools and drains of deposit were removed
without any alteration whatever in the adjacent sewers,
fevers disappeared from house to house, as these receptacles
were filled up, and the water-closet apparatus substituted,
merely in consequence of the removal of the decomposing
matter from beneath the houses to a distant
sewer of deposit or open water course.
"If the mortality were at the same rate as in the model
dwellings, or in the improved dwellings in Lambeth
Square, the annual deaths for the whole of the metropolis
would be 25,000 less, and for the whole of England and
Wales 170,000 less than the actual deaths.
"If the reduced rate of mortality in these dwellings
should continue, and there appears to be no reason to
suppose that it will not, the extension to all towns which
have been affected, of the improvements which have been
applied in these buildings, would raise the average age
at death to about forty-eight instead of twenty-nine, the
present average age at death of the inhabitants of towns
in all England and Wales."
The branch of the Art of Drainage which relates to the
removal of the fecal and other refuse wastes of the population
of towns, is quite different from that which has been
described in the preceding pages, as applicable to the agricultural
and sanitary improvement of lands under cultivation,
and of suburban districts. Still, the fact that town
and house drainage affords a means for the preservation
of valuable manures, justifies its discussion in an agricultural
work, and "draining for health" would stop far short
of completeness were no attention paid to the removal of
the cause of diseases, which are far more fatal than those
that originate in an undrained condition of the soil.
The extent to which these diseases, (of which typhoid
fever is a type,) are prevented by sanitary drainage, is
strikingly shown in the extract which commences this
chapter. Since the experience to which this report refers,
it has been found that the most fatal epidemics of the
lower portions of London originated in the choked condition
of the street sewers, whose general character, as well
as the plan of improvement adopted are described in the
following "Extracts from the Report of the Metropolitan
Board of Works," made in 1866.
"The main sewers discharged their whole contents direct
into the Thames, the majority of them capable of
being emptied only at the time of low water; consequently,
as the tide rose, the outlets of the sewers were
closed, and the sewage was dammed back, and became
stagnant; the sewage and impure waters were also
constantly flowing from the higher grounds, in some instances
during 18 out of the 24 hours, and thus the thick
and heavy substances were deposited, which had to be
afterwards removed by the costly process of hand labor.
During long continued or copious falls of rain, more particularly
when these occurred at the time of high water
in the river, the closed outlets not having sufficient storage
capacity to receive the increased volume of sewage,
the houses and premises in the low lying districts, especially
on the south side of the river, became flooded by
the sewage rising through the house drains, and so continued
until the tide had receded sufficiently to afford a
vent for the pent-up waters, when the sewage flowed
and deposited itself along the banks of the river, evolving
gases of a foul and offensive character.
"This state of things had a most injurious effect upon
the condition of the Thames; for not only was the sewage
carried up the river by the rising tide, at a time
when the volume of pure water was at its minimum, and
quite insufficient to dilute and disinfect it, but it was
brought back again into the heart of the metropolis, there
to mix with each day's fresh supply, until the gradual
progress towards the sea of many day's accumulation
could be plainly discerned; the result being that the portion
of the river within the metropolitan district became
scarcely less impure and offensive than the foulest of the
sewers themselves. * * * * * *
"The Board, by the system they have adopted, have
sought to abolish the evils which hitherto existed, by
constructing new lines of sewers, laid in a direction at
right angles to that of the existing sewers, and a little
below their levels, so as to intercept their contents and
convey them to an outfall, on the north side of the Thames
about 11-1/4 miles, and on the south side about 14 miles,
below London Bridge. By this arrangement as large a
proportion of the sewage as practicable is carried away
by gravitation, and a constant discharge for the remainder
is provided by means of pumping. At the outlets,
the sewage is delivered into reservoirs situate on the
banks of the Thames, and placed at such levels as enable
them to discharge into the river at or about the time of
high water. The sewage thus becomes not only at
once diluted by the large volume of water in the river at
the time of high water, but is also carried by the ebb
26 miles below London Bridge, and its return by the following
flood-tide within the metropolitan area, is effectually
prevented."
The details of this stupendous enterprise are of sufficient
interest to justify the introduction here of the "General
Statistics of the Works" as reported by the Board.
"A few statistics relative to the works may not prove
uninteresting. The first portion of the works was commenced
in January 1859, being about five months after
the passing of the Act authorising their execution.
There are 82 miles of main intercepting sewers in London.
In the construction of the works 318,000,000 of bricks,
and 880,000 cubic yards of concrete have been used,
and 3,500,000 cubic yards of earth excavated. The cost,
when completed, will have been about £4,200,000. The
total pumping power employed is 2,300 nominal
horse power: and if the engines were at full work, night
and day, 44,000 tons of coals per annum would be used;
but the average consumption is estimated at 20,000 tons.
The sewage to be intercepted by the works on the north
side of the river, at present amounts to 10,000,000 cubic
feet, and on the south side 4,000,000 cubic feet per day;
but provision is made for an anticipated increase in these
quantities, in addition to the rainfall, amounting to a total
of 63,000,000 cubic feet per day, which is equal to a
lake of 482 acres, three feet deep, or 15 times as large as
the Serpentine in Hyde Park."
A very large portion of the sewage has to be lifted
thirty-six feet to the outfall sewer. The works on the
north side of the Thames were formally opened, by the
Prince of Wales, in April 1865.
In the hope that the immense amount of sewage, for
which an escape has been thus provided, might be profitably
employed in agriculture, advertisements were inserted in
the public journals asking for proposals for carrying out
such a scheme; and arrangements were subsequently made
for an extension of the works, by private enterprise, by the
construction of a culvert nine and a half feet in diameter,
and forty miles in length, capable of carrying 12,000,000
cubic feet of sewage per day to the barren sands on the
coast of Essex; the intention being to dispose of the liquid
to farmers along the line, and to use the surplus for the
fertilization of 7000 acres, (to be subsequently increased,)
which are to be reclaimed from the sea by embankments
and valve sluice-gates.
The estimated cost of this enterprise is about $10,000,000.
The work which has been done, and which is now in
contemplation, in England, is suggestive of what might,
with advantage, be adopted in the larger cities in America.
Especially in New York an improved means of outlet
is desirable, and it is doubtful whether the high rate
of mortality of that city will be materially reduced before
effective measures are devised for removing the vast
accumulations of filth, which ebb and flow in many of the
larger sewers, with each change of the tide; and which
are deposited between the piers along the river-sides.
It would be practicable to construct a main receiving
sewer under the river streets, skirting the city, from the
vicinity of Bellevue Hospital on the east side, passing near
the outer edge of the Battery, and continuing to the high
land near 60th street on the west side; having its water
level at least twenty feet below the level of the street, and
receiving all of the sewage which now flows into the river.
At the Battery, this receiving sewer might be connected,
by a tunnel, with the Brooklyn shore, its contents being
carried to a convenient point south of Fort Hamilton,—where
their discharge, (by lifting steam pumps), into the
waters of the Lower Bay, would be attended with no inconvenience.
The improvement being carried out to this point,
it would probably not be long before the advantages to
result from the application of the sewage to the sandy
soil on the south side of Long Island would be manifest.
The effect of such an improvement on the health of the
city,—which is now in constant danger from the putrefying
filth of the sewers, (these being little better than covered
cess-pools under the streets,)—would, no doubt, equal the
improvement that has resulted from similar work in
London.
The foregoing relates only to the main outlets for town
sewage. The arterial drainage, (the lateral drains of the
system,) which receives the waste of the houses and the
wash of the streets, is entirely dependent on the outlet
sewers, and can be effective only when these are so constructed
as to afford a free outfall for the matters that it delivers
to them. In many towns, owing to high situation,
or to a rapid inclination of surface, the outfall is naturally
so good as to require but little attention. In all cases, the
manner of constructing the collecting drains is a matter of
great importance, and in this work a radical change has
been introduced within a few years past.
Formerly, immense conduits of porous brick work, in all
cases large enough to be entered to be cleansed, by hand
labor, of their accumulated deposits, were considered necessary
for the accommodation of the smallest discharge. The
consequence of this was, that, especially in sewers carrying
but little water, the solid matters contained in the sewage
were deposited by the sluggish flow, frequently causing
the entire obstruction of the passages. Such drains always
required frequent and expensive cleansing by hand, and the
decomposition of the filth which they contained produced
a most injurious effect on the health of persons living near
their connections with the street. The foul liquids with
which they were filled, passing through their porous
walls, impregnated the earth near them, and sometimes
reached to the cellars of adjacent houses, which were in
consequence rendered extremely unhealthy. Many such
sewers are now in existence, and some such are still being
constructed. Not only are they unsatisfactory, they are
much more expensive in construction, and require much
attention and labor for repairs, and cleansing, than do the
stone-ware pipe sewers which are now universally adopted
wherever measures are taken to investigate their comparative
merits. An example of the difference between the old
and modern styles of sewers is found in the drainage of the
Westminster School buildings, etc., in London.
The new drainage conveys the house and surface drainage
of about two acres on which are fifteen large houses.
The whole length of the drain is about three thousand feet,
and the entire outlet is through two nine inch pipes. The
drainage is perfectly removed, and the pipes are always
clean, no foul matters being deposited at any point. This
drainage has been adopted as a substitute for an old system
of sewerage of which the main was from 4 feet high, by
3 feet 6 inches wide, to 17 feet high and 6 or 7 feet wide.
The houses had cess-pools beneath them, which were filled
with the accumulations of many years, while the sewers
themselves were scarcely less offensive. This condition
resulted in a severe epidemic fever of a very fatal character.
An examination instituted to discover the cause of the
epidemic resulted in the discovery of the facts set forth
above, and there were removed from the drains and cess-pools
more than 550 loads of ordure. The evaporating
surface of this filth was more than 2000 square yards.
Since the new drainage, not only has there been no recurrence
of epidemic fever, but "a greater improvement in
the general health of the population has succeeded than
might be reasonably expected in a small block of houses,
amidst an ill-conditioned district, from which it cannot be
completely isolated."
The principle which justifies the use of pipe sewers is precisely
that which has been described in recommending small
tiles for agricultural drainage,—to wit: that the rapidity of
a flow of water, and its power to remove obstacles, is in proportion
to its depth as compared with its width. It has been
found in practice, that a stream which wends its sluggish
way along the bottom of a large brick culvert, when concentrated
within the area of a small pipe of regular form,
flows much more rapidly, and will carry away even whole
bricks, and other substances which were an obstacle to its
flow in the larger channel. As an experiment as to the
efficacy of small pipes Mr. Hale, the surveyor, who was
directed by the General Board of Health of London to
make the trial, laid a 12-inch pipe in the bottom of a sewer
5 feet and 6 inches high, and 3 feet and 6 inches wide.
The area drained was about 44 acres. He found the velocity
of the stream in the pipe to be four and a half times
greater than that of the same amount of water in the
sewer. The pipe at no time accumulated silt, and the
force of the water issuing from the end of the pipe kept
the bottom of the sewer perfectly clear for the distance of
12 feet, beyond which point some bricks and stones were
deposited, their quantity increasing with the distance from
the pipe. He caused sand, pieces of bricks, stones, mud,
etc., to be put into the head of the pipe. These were all
carried clear through the pipe, but were deposited in the
sewer below it.
It has been found by experiment that in a flat bottomed
sewer, four feet wide, having a fall of eight inches in one
hundred feet, a stream of water one inch depth, runs very
sluggishly, while the same water running through a 12-inch
pipe, laid on the same inclination, forms a rapid
stream, carrying away the heavy silt which was deposited
in the broad sewer. As a consequence of this, it has been
found, where pipe sewers are used, even on almost imperceptible
inclinations, that silt is very rarely deposited, and
the waste matters of house and street drainage are carried
immediately to the outlet, instead of remaining to ferment
and poison the atmosphere of the streets through which
they pass. In the rare cases of obstruction which occur,
the pipes are very readily cleansed by flushing, at a tithe
of the cost of the constant hand-work required in brick
sewers.
For the first six or seven hundred feet at the head of a
sewer, a six inch pipe will remove all of the house and
street drainage, even during a heavy rain fall; and if the
inclination is rapid, (say 6 inches to 100 feet,) the acceleration
of the flow, caused partly by the constant additions
to the water, pipes of this size may be used for considerably
greater distances. It has been found by actual trial
that it is not necessary to increase the size of the pipe
sewer in exact proportion to the amount of drainage that
it has to convey, as each addition to the flow, where
drainage is admitted from street openings or from houses,
accelerates the velocity of the current, pipes discharging
even eight times as much when received at intervals along
the line as they would take from a full head at the upper
end of the sewer.
For a district inhabited by 10,000 persons, a 12-inch pipe
would afford a sufficient outlet, unless the amount of road
drainage were unusually large, and for the largest sewers,
pipes of more than 18 inches diameter are rarely used,
these doing the work which, under the old system, was alloted
to a sewer 6 feet high and 3 feet broad.
Of course, the connections by which the drainage of
roads is admitted to these sewers, must be provided with
ample silt-basins, which require frequent cleaning out. In
the construction of the sewers, man-holes, built to the surface,
are placed at sufficient intervals, and at all points
where the course of the sewer changes, so that a light placed
at one of these may be seen from the next one;—the contractor
being required to lay the sewer so that the light
may be thus seen, a straight line both of inclination and
direction is secured.
The rules which regulate the laying of land-drains apply
with equal force in the making of sewers, that is no
part of the pipe should be less perfect, either in material
or construction, than that which lies above it; and where
the inclination becomes less, in approaching the outlet, silt-basins
should be employed, unless the decreased fall is still
rapid. The essential point of difference is, that while land
drains may be of porous material, and should have open
joints for the admission of water, sewer pipes should be
of impervious glazed earthen-ware, and their joints should
be securely cemented, to prevent the escape of the sewage,
which it is their province to remove, not to distribute.
Drains from houses, which need not be more than 3 or 4
inches in diameter, should be of the same material, and
should discharge with considerable inclination into the
pipes, being connected with a curving branch, directing
the fluid towards the outlet.
In laying a sewer, it is customary to insert a pipe with
a branch opposite each house, or probable site of a house.
It is important that, in towns not supplied with waterworks,
measures be taken to prevent the admission of too
much solid matter in the drainage of houses. Water being
the motive power for the removal of the solid parts of the
sewage, unless there be a public supply which can be
turned on at pleasure, no house should deliver more solid
matter than can be carried away by its refuse waters.
The drainage of houses is one of the chief objects of
sewerage.
In addition to the cases cited above of the model lodging
houses in Lambeth Square, and of the buildings at Westminster,
it may be well to refer to a remarkable epidemic
which broke out in the Maplewood Young Ladies' Institute
in Pittsfield, Mass., in 1864, which was of so violent and
fatal a character as to elicit a special examination by a
committee of physicians. The family consisted, (pupils,
servants, and all,) of one hundred and twelve persons. Of
these, fifty-one were attacked with well-defined typhoid
fever during a period of less than three weeks. Of this
number thirteen died. The following is extracted from
the report of the committee:
"Of the 74 resident pupils heard from, 66 are reported
as having had illness of some kind at the close of the
school or soon after. This is a proportion of 33/37 or nearly
90 per cent. Of the same 74, fifty-one had typhoid fever,
or a proportion of nearly 69 per cent. If all the people
in the town, say 8000, had been affected in an equal proportion,
more than 7000 would have been ill during these
few weeks, and about 5500 of them would have had
typhoid fever, and of these over 1375 would have died.
If it would be a more just comparison to take the whole
family at Maplewood into the account, estimating the
number at 112, fifty-six had typhoid fever, or 50 per
cent., and of these fifty-six, sixteen died, or over 28.5 per
cent. These proportions applied to the whole population
of 8000, would give 4000 of typhoid fever in the same
time; and of these 1140 would have died. According
to the testimony of the practising physicians of Pittsfield,
the number of cases of typhoid fever, during this period,
aside from those affected by the influences at Maplewood,
was small, some physicians not having had any, others
had two or three." These cases amounted to but eight,
none of which terminated fatally.
The whole secret of this case was proven to have been
the retention of the ordure and waste matter from the
kitchens and dormitories in privies and vaults, underneath
or immediately adjoining the buildings, the odor from
these having been offensively perceptible, and under certain
atmospheric conditions, having pervaded the whole
house.
The committee say "it would be impossible to bring
this report within reasonable limits, were we to discuss the
various questions connected with the origin and propagation
of typhoid fever, although various theoretical views
are held as to whether the poison producing the disease
is generated in the bodies of the sick, and communicated
from them to the well, or whether it is generated in
sources exterior to the bodies of fever patients, yet all
authorities maintain that a peculiar poison is concerned
in its production.
"Those who hold to the doctrine of contagion admit
that, to give such contagion efficacy in the production of
wide spread results, filth or decaying organic matter is
essential; while those who sustain the theory of non-contagion—the
production of the poison from sources
without the bodies of the sick—contend that it has its
entire origin in such filth—in decomposing matter, especially
in fermenting sewage, and decaying human excreta.
"The injurious influence of decomposing azotised matter,
in either predisposing to or exciting severe disease, and
particularly typhoid fever, is universally admitted among
high medical authorities."
The committee were of the opinion "that the disease
at Maplewood essentially originated in the state of the
privies and drainage of the place; the high temperature,
and other peculiar atmospheric conditions developing, in
the organic material thus exposed, a peculiar poison,
which accumulated in sufficient quantity to pervade
the whole premises, and operated a sufficient length of
time to produce disease in young and susceptible persons.
* * * * * * To prevent the poison of
typhoid fever when taken into the system, from producing
its legitimate effects, except by natural agencies,
would require as positive a miracle as to restore a severed
head, or arrest the course of the heavenly bodies in their
spheres. * * * The lesson for all, for the future, is
too obvious to need further pointing out; and the committee
cannot doubt that they would hazard little in
predicting that the wisdom obtained by this sad experience,
will be of value in the future management of this
institution, and secure precautions which will forever
prevent the recurrence of such a calamity."
The results of all sanitary investigation indicate clearly
the vital necessity for the complete and speedy removal
from human habitations of all matters which, by their decomposition,
may tend to the production of disease,
and early measures should be taken by the authorities of
all towns, especially those which are at all compactly built,
to secure this removal. The means by which this is to be
effected are to be found in such a combination of water-supply
and sewerage, as will furnish a constant and copious
supply of water to dissolve or hold in suspension the whole
of the waste matters, and will provide a channel through
which they may be carried away from the vicinity of residences.
If means for the application of the sewage water
to agricultural lands can be provided, a part if not the
whole of the cost of the works will be thus returned.
Concerning the details of house drainage, it would be
impossible to say much within the limits of this book. The
construction of water-closets, soil-pipes, sinks, etc., are too
will be understood to need a special description here.
The principal point, (aside from the use of pipes instead
of brick-sewers and brick house-drains,) is what is called
in London the system of Back Drainage, where only
principal main lines of sewers are laid under the streets,
all collecting sewers passing through the centres of the
blocks in the rear of the houses. Pipes for water supply
are disposed in the same manner, as it is chiefly at
the rears of houses that water is required, and that drainage
is most necessary; and this adjustment saves the cost,
the annoyance and the loss of fall, which accompany the
use of pipes running under the entire length of each house.
Much tearing up of pavements, expensive ditching in hard
road-ways, and interference with traffic is avoided, while
very much less ditching and piping is necessary, and repairs
are made with very little annoyance to the occupants of
houses. The accompanying diagrams, (Figs. 48-49,) illustrate
the difference between the old system of drainage
with brick sewers under the streets, and brick drains under
the houses, and pipe sewers under main streets and through
the back yards of premises. A measurement of these two
methods will show that the lengths of the drains in the
new system, are to those of the old, as 1 to 2-1/4;—the fall of
the house drains, (these having much less length,) would
be 10 times more in the one case than in the other;—the
main sewers would have twice the fall, their area would be
only 1/30], and their cubic contents only 1/73.
Fig. 48 - OLD STYLE HOUSE DRAINAGE AND SEWERAGE.
Fig. 48 - OLD STYLE HOUSE DRAINAGE AND SEWERAGE.
Experience in England has shown that if the whole cost
of water supply and pipe sewers is, with its interest, divided
over a period of thirty years,—so that at the end of that
time it should all be repaid,—the annual charge would not
be greater than the cost of keeping house-drains and cess-pools
pools clean. The General Board of Health state that "the
expense of cleansing the brick house-drains and cess-pools
for four or five years, would pay the expense of properly
constructed water-closets and pipe-drains, for the greater
number of old premises."
Fig. 49 - MODERN HOUSE DRAINAGE AND SEWERAGE.
Fig. 49 - MODERN HOUSE DRAINAGE AND SEWERAGE.
One of the reports of this body, which has added more
than any other organization to the world's knowledge on
these subjects, closes with the following:
"Conclusions obtained as to house drainage, and the
sewerage and cleansing of the sites of towns."
"That no population living amidst impurities, arising
from the putrid emanations from cess-pools, drains and
sewers of deposit, can be healthy or free from the attacks
of devastating epidemics.
"That as a primary condition of salubrity, no ordure
and town refuse can be permitted to remain beneath or
near habitations.
"That by no means can remedial operations be so conveniently,
economically, inoffensively, and quickly effected
as by the removal of all such refuse dissolved or suspended
in water.
"That it has been subsequently proved by the operation
of draining houses with tubular drains, in upwards of
19,000 cases, and by the trial of more than 200 miles of
pipe sewers, that the practice of constructing large brick
or stone sewers for general town drainage, which detain
matters passing into them in suspension in water, which
accumulate deposit, and which are made large enough
for men to enter them, and remove the deposit by hand
labor, without reference to the area to be drained, has
been in ignorance, neglect or perversion of the above
recited principles.
"That while sewers so constructed are productive of
great injury to the public health, by the diffusion into
houses and streets of the noxious products of the decomposing
matters contained in them, they are wasteful from
the increased expense of their construction and repair,
and from the cost of ineffectual efforts to keep them free
from deposit.
"That the house-drains, made as they have heretofore
been, of absorbent brick or stone, besides detaining substances
in suspension, accumulating foul deposit, and
being so permeable as to permit the escape of the liquid
and gaseous matters, are also false in principle and wasteful
in the expense of construction, cleansing and repair.
"That it results from the experience developed in these
inquiries, that improved tubular house-drains and sewers
of the proper sizes, inclinations, and material, detain and
accumulate no deposit, emit no offensive smells, and require
no additional supplies of water to keep them clear.
"That the offensive smells proceeding from any works
intended for house or town drainage, indicate the fact
of the detention and decomposition of ordure, and afford
decisive evidence of mal-construction or of ignorant or
defective arrangement.
"That the method of removing refuse in suspension in
water by properly combined works, is much better than
that of collecting it in pits or cess-pools near or underneath
houses, emptying it by hand labor, and removing
it by carts.
"That it is important for the sake of economy, as well
as for the health of the population, that the practice of
the removal of refuse in suspension in water, and by combined
works, should be applied to all houses, especially
those occupied by the poorer classes."
Later investigations of the subject have established two
general conclusions applicable to the subject, namely, that:
"In towns all offensive smells from the decomposition
of animal and vegetable matter, indicate the generation
and presence of the causes of insalubrity and of preventable
disease, at the same time that they prove defective
local administration;
and correlatively, that:
"In rural districts all continuous offensive smells from
animal and vegetable decomposition, indicate preventable
loss of fertilizing matter, loss of money, and bad
husbandry."
The principles herein set forth, whether relating to sanitary
improvement, to convenience and decency of living,
or to the use of waste matters of houses in agricultural
improvement, are no less applicable in America than elsewhere;
and the more general adoption of improved house
drainage and sewerage, and of the use of sewage matters
in agriculture, would add to the health and prosperity of
its people, and would indicate a great advance in civilization.
INDEX
Absorption and Filtration, 26-39Angles to be, as far as possible, avoided, 99Baking of clay soils by evaporation, 30Barley, 168Bartlett, Dr., quotation from, 211Base-line, 145Boning-rods, (with illustrations), 125-126Central Park, 74-86Cess-pools, cause of epidemics, 237Chadwick, Dr., quotation from, 213Clay Soils, 75Clay Soils, Baking of by Evaporation, 30Clay Soils, Made mellow by draining, 29-30Clay Soils, Shrinkage of, 28Clinometer, (illustration), 56Collars, 84Connections, 132Connections (illustrations), 134Corn, Indian, 162Cost of draining, 150-153-158Cotton, 169Covering and filling, cost of, 157Covering for the joints of tiles, 132Covering tiles, 136Datum-line, 52-104Denton, J. Bailey, quotation from, 115Distance between drains, 73Diseases, malarial, 208Ditches, cost of digging, 154Draining, amateur, 47Draining, indications of the need of, 9Draining, its effect on farming, 171Draining, tiles, how made, 174Draining, tiles, materials for, 174Draining, tools, (illustration), 114Draining, what it costs, 150Draining, will it pay? 161Draining, when necessary, 7Drains, Cubic yards of excavation in, 155Drains, and drained land, care of, 144Drains, lateral, should be parallel, 99Drains, how they act, 21Drains, obstructed, how cleared, 146Drains, old, how formed, 146Drains, rate of fall, 90Drains, their action in the Central Park, 86Drained Soil, capacity for receiving water of rains, 23Drainage of dwelling houses, 232Drought, 37-40Economy versus cheapness, 152Engineering and Superintendence, cost of, 153Engineers, draining, 47Epidemic at Maplewood Young Ladies' Institute, 232Epidemics caused by cess-pools, 237Epidemics caused by ordure beneath houses, 238Evaporation, 33Evaporation, amount of, 34Evaporation, effect on temperature, 33-35Evaporation, heat lost during, 34Fall, rate of in drains, 77Fallacies in draining, 62Fen-lands of England, 193Fever and Ague, 208Fever and Ague, exact cause unknown, 210Filtration and absorption, 26-39Filling, illustration of—ditch with, furrows, 141Filling, maul for ramming, (illustration), 138Filling, scraper for, (illustration), 140Filling, the ditches, 136Finishing tools, (illustration), 123Finishing scoop, 123Finishing scoop, how used, 126Foot-pick, (illustration), 156Four-foot drains, 70Germination of seeds, 13Gisborne, Thos., quotations from, 28-31-35-47-66-78-84-93-127Grading, 124Grading, cost of, 156Grade stakes, 103Grades, computation for, 109Grades, how to establish, 107Gratings in Silt-basins, 148Hackensack meadows, 203Hay, 168Heat, amount of lost during evaporation, 34House drainage, 220House drainage, back drain system, 235House drainage bad, indicated by offensive smells, 239Indications of the need of draining, 9Injury from standing water in the subsoil, 15Impervious soil, 31John Johnson, 164Land requiring draining, 7Lateral drains, 61-97Lateral drains, direction of, 75Lateral drains, shallow, how connected with deep main, 111La Roche, quotations from, 213Levels, how to take for drains, 104Levelling instrument, (illustration), 52Levelling rod, (illustration), 53Location of main drains, 58Madden, Dr., quotation from, 12Main drain, 96Main drain, location of, 58Malaria 211Malaria borne by winds, 212-214-219Malaria conclusions of the General Board of Health of England, 220Malaria facts concerning, 212Malaria spread of, prevented by hills, 218Malarial diseases, evidence of the effect of drainage in removing, 216Malarial diseases, reports to the British Parliament concerning, 216Malarial diseases, rheumatism and tic-douloureux, 219Malarious localities, effects of residence in, 214Maps, amending the, 142Maps, description of, (illustrations), 49-50-51-54-98Maps, importance of, 48Marking the lines, 116Mechi, Alderman, quotations from, 29-71Mellowness or Porosity, 41Measuring staff (illustration), 124Metcalf, Dr., quotation from, 211Movement of water in the ground, 32-64-65Mortality, rate of reduced by improved house drainage, 222Neuralgia, 208New York, suggestions for sewer outlets, 227Oats, 168Obstructions, 90Opening ditches, 122Outlet, 95Outlet, how made (with illustrations), 118Outlet, location of, 58Parkes, Josiah, quotations from, 36-71-88-178Porosity, 41Profile of a drain, (illustration), 106Profit, instances of, 167-170Production, amount of increase of, necessary to make draining profitable, 162Puddling, 8-31-148Pumping, 206Pumping, London sewage, 226Rock, sounding for, 55Rock, how to collect water from, 60Roots, depth to which they reach, 40-67Roots, as a cause of obstruction, 93-148Rye, 168Salisbury's, Dr., theory concerning malarious fever, 214Salt marshes, catch water drains, 201Salt marshes, construction of embankment, 196Salt marshes, dyke and ditch, (illustration), 197Salt marshes, exclusion of the sea, 195Salt marshes, how formed, 194Salt marshes, inundations from upland , 201Salt marshes, location and size of embankment, 195Salt marshes, management of creeks, 198-200Salt marshes, management of rivers, 201Salt marshes, muskrats, 199Salt marshes, outlet for under drainage, 204-205Salt marshes, pumping, 206Salt marshes, rain-fall and filtration, 204Salt marshes, valve-gates and sluices, 204Scraper for filling ditches, (illustration), 140Seeds, germination of, 13Sewage, use of in agriculture, 226Sewers, defects of large, 228-238Sewers, description of the London outfall, 225Sewers, efficacy of glazed earthern pipes, 229-230-238Sewers, experiments of Hale on pipe sewers, 230Sewers, imperfect, 224Sewers, of brick, defective, 228-235-238Sewerage, conclusions of General Board of Health, 237Sewerage, of New York, 227Shrinkage of clay soils, 28Sides of ditches in soft land, how braced, (illustration), 124Silt, 90Silt, basins, (illustrations), 121-135-136Silt, basins, how made, 120Silt, basins, 91-96-134Silt, in tiles, 144Sources of the water in the soil, 10Springs, how to collect the water of, 59-60-141Staking out the lines, 102Staten Island, 209Steam pumps, 206Stone and tile drains, 142Sub-mains, 59Teams used in opening ditches, 122Temperature, 35-66Temperature, affected by draining, 36Tile laying, 127Tile-pick, (illustration), 131Tiles, and tile laying, cost of, 157Tiles, capacity for discharging water, 84-86Tiles, double-style, 80Tiles, drain—essential characteristics, 22Tiles, how made, 174Tiles, horse-shoe, 78Tiles, kinds and sizes, 77Tiles, ordering, 82-101Tiles, objections to large sizes, 147Tiles, pipes and collars, 81Tiles, rapidity with which they receive water, 78Tiles, sizes of, 81Tiles, sizes required for different areas, 88Tiles, should be well formed, 83Tiles, sole, 80Tiles, trimming and perforating, 131Tile making, material for, 174Tile preparation of earths, 176Tile rolling and drying, 182Tile washing the clay, 177Tobacco, 169Tools required, 113Town drainage, conclusions of General Board of Health, 237Undrained land not reliable for cultivation, 18Vermin as a cause of obstruction, 93Water, depth of, 66-70Water, in the sub-soil, injurious effects of, 15Water, movement of in the ground, 32-64-65Water, objections to excess of, 11Water, the best vehicle for removing ordure, 238Water, when beneficial and when injurious, 24Water-courses and brooks, how treated during draining operations, 117Water-table, 22Wind-mills, 206Wheat, 164-167
DRAINING ENGINEERING.
The undersigned is prepared to assume the personal
direction of works of Agricultural and Town Drainage,
and Water Supply, in any part of the country; or to send
advice and information, by letter, for the guidance of
others.
Persons sending maps of their land, with contour lines,
(see Fig. 8, page 54,) accompanied by such information as
can be given in writing, will be furnished with explicit instructions
concerning the arrangement and depth of the
drains required; kinds and sizes of tiles to be used; management
of the work, etc., etc.
The lines of drains will be laid down, on the maps, for
the direction of local engineers,—and, when required, the
grades will be calculated and noted at the positions of the
stakes.
For particulars, address
GEO. E. WARING, JR.,
P. O. Box 290,Newport, R. I.
THE SMALL FRUIT CULTURIST.
BY
ANDREW S. FULLER.
Beautifully Illustrated.
We have heretofore had no work especially devoted to small
fruits, and certainly no treatises anywhere that give the information
contained in this. It is to the advantage of special works that the
author can say all that he has to say on any subject, and not be
restricted as to space, as he must be in those works that cover the
culture of all fruits—great and small.
This book covers the whole ground of Propagating Small Fruits,
their Culture, Varieties, Packing for Market, etc. While very full on
the other fruits, the Currants and Raspberries have been more carefully
elaborated than ever before, and in this important part of his
book, the author has had the invaluable counsel of Charles Downing.
The chapter on gathering and packing the fruit is a valuable one,
and in it are figured all the baskets and boxes now in common use.
The book is very finely and thoroughly illustrated, and makes an
admirable companion to the Grape Culturist, by the same author.
CONTENTS:
Chap. I. Barberry.Chap. II. Strawberry.Chap. III. Raspberry.Chap. IV. Blackberry.Chap. V. Dwarf Cherry.Chap. VI. Currant.Chap. VII. Gooseberry.Chap. VIII. Cornelian Cherry.Chap. IX. Cranberry.Chap. X. Huckleberry.Chap. XI. Sheperdia.Chap. XII. Preparation for gathering Fruit.
Sent post-paid. Price $1.50.
ORANGE JUDD & CO., 245 Broadway, New-York.
THE GRAPE CULTURIST
BY
ANDREW S. FULLER.
NEW AND ENLARGED EDITION.
THE STANDARD WORK
ON THE CULTIVATION OF THE HARDY GRAPE,
AS IT NOT ONLY DISCUSSES PRINCIPLES,
BUT
ILLUSTRATES PRACTICE.
Every thing is made perfectly plain, and its teachings
may be followed upon.
ONE VINE OR A VINEYARD
The following are some of the topics that are treated:
Growing New Varieties From Seed.Propagation by Single Buds or Eyes.Propagating Houses and their Management fully described.How to Grow.Cuttings in Open Air, and how to Make Layers.Grafting the Grape—A Simple and Successful Method.Hybridizing and Crossing—Mode of Operation.Soil and Situation—Planting and Cultivation.Pruning, Training, and Trellises—all the Systems Explained.Garden Culture—How to Grow Vines in a Door-Yard.Insects, Mildew, Sun-Scald, and other Troubles.Description of the Valuable and the Discarded Varieties.
Sent post-paid. Price $1.50.
Orange Judd & Co., 245 Broadway.
AMERICAN POMOLOGY
APPLES.
By Doct. JOHN A. WARDER,
PRESIDENT OHIO POMOLOGICAL SOCIETY; VICE-PRESIDENT AMERICAN POMOLOGICAL
SOCIETY.
293 ILLUSTRATIONS.
This volume has about 750 pages, the first 375 of which are devoted
to the discussion of the general subjects of propagation, nursery
culture, selection and planting, cultivation of orchards, care of
fruit, insects, and the like; the remainder is occupied with descriptions
of apples. With the richness of material at hand, the trouble
was to decide what to leave out. It will be found that while the
old and standard varieties are not neglected, the new and promising
sorts, especially those of the South and West, have prominence.
A list of selections for different localities by eminent orchardists is
a valuable portion of the volume, while the Analytical Index or
Catalogue Raisonné, as the French would say, is the most extended
American fruit list ever published, and gives evidence of a fearful
amount of labor.
CONTENTS.
Chapter I.—INTRODUCTORY.
Chapter II.—HISTORY OF THE APPLE.
Chapter III.—PROPAGATION. - Buds and Cuttings—Grafting—Budding—The Nursery.
Chapter IV.—DWARFING.
Chapter V.—DISEASES.
Chapter VI.—THE SITE FOR AN ORCHARD.
Chapter VII.—PREPARATION OF SOIL FOR AN ORCHARD.
Chapter VIII.—SELECTION AND PLANTING.
Chapter IX.—CULTURE, Etc.
Chapter X.—PHILOSOPHY OF PRUNING.
Chapter XI.—THINNING.
Chapter XII.—RIPENING AND PRESERVING FRUITS.
Chapter XIII and XIV.—INSECTS.
Chapter XV.—CHARACTERS OF FRUITS AND THEIR VALUE—TERMS USED.
Chapter XVI.—CLASSIFICATION. - Necessity for—Basis of—Characters—Shape—Its Regularity—Flavor—Color—Their several Values, etc. Description of Apples.
Chapter XVII.—FRUIT LISTS—CATALOGUE AND INDEX OF FRUITS.
Sent Post-Paid. Price $3.00.
ORANGE JUDD & CO., 245 Broadway, New-York
GARDENING FOR PROFIT
In the Market and Family Garden.
By Peter Henderson.
FINELY ILLUSTRATED.
This is the first work on Market Gardening ever published in this
country. Its author is well known as a market gardener of eighteen
years' successful experience. In this work he has recorded this
experience, and given, without reservation, the methods necessary
to the profitable culture of the commercial or
MARKET GARDEN.
It is a work for which there has long been a demand, and one
which will commend itself, not only to those who grow vegetables
for sale, but to the cultivator of the
FAMILY GARDEN,
to whom it presents methods quite different from the old ones generally
practiced. It is an ORIGINAL AND PURELY AMERICAN work, and
not made up, as books on gardening too often are, by quotations
from foreign authors.
Every thing is made perfectly plain, and the subject treated in all
its details, from the selection of the soil to preparing the products
for market.
CONTENTS.
Men fitted for the Business of Gardening.
The Amount of Capital Required, and
Working Force per Acre.
Profits of Market Gardening.
Location, Situation, and Laying Out.
Soils, Drainage, and Preparation.
Manures, Implements.
Uses and Management of Cold Frames.
Formation and Management of Hot-beds.
Forcing Pits or Green-houses.
Seeds and Seed Raising.
How, When, and Where to Sow Seeds.
Transplanting, Insects.
Packing of Vegetables for Shipping.
Preservation of Vegetables in Winter.
Vegetables, their Varieties and Cultivation.
In the last chapter, the most valuable kinds are described, and
the culture proper to each is given in detail.
Sent post-paid, price $1.50.
ORANGE JUDD & CO., 245 Broadway, New-York.
The American Agricultural Annual
FOR 1870.
A YEAR BOOK
WANTED BY EVERY BODY.
This valuable Year Book has now reached its fourth number.
In its general features it follows the plan of the three numbers
that have preceded it, and, like them, is beautifully illustrated.
CONTENTS.
Almanac and Calendar for 1870. Agricultural and Kindred Journals. Agricultural
and Kindred Books. Prospect and Retrospect. Immigration. Home
Markets. Coöperation among Farmers. Commercial Fertilizers. The Crops
and the Weather. Thorough Drainage. Agricultural Exhibitions. Poultry
Societies and Shows. Importation of Live Stock. Death of Distinguished
Agriculturists. Inventions affecting Agriculture. Novelties in Agricultural
Seeds, etc. Oats. Sanford Corn. Potato Fever. Adobe or Earth-wall Building—by
E. G. Potter. Potatoes Worth Raising—by Dr. F. M. Hexamer.
Yield of Potatoes in 1869. Wheat Hoe. How to Train a Heifer. Care of Hen
and Chickens. Cultivation of Root Crops. Kohl Rabi. Dry Earth—the Earth-Closet
Principle in the Barn. General Agricultural Matters. Characteristics
of Different Breeds of Thoroughbred Stock. Earth-Closets—Success of the
System. Progress in Fish Culture. Cold Spring Trout Ponds. Bellows Falls
Trout Pond. Montdale Ponds. S. H. Ainsworth's Ponds and Race. Mumford
Ponds. Poheganut Trout Ponds. Breeds of Fish. Fish as Farm Stock—by
W. Clift. The Stocking of Ponds and Brooks. English Agricultural Implements.
Inventions affecting Milk, and Cheese-making—by Gardner B. Weeks.
Notes on Veterinary Subjects. Coöperation in Swine-breeding. Letter from
Dr. Calvin Cutter. Steaming Fodder for Milch Cows—by S. M. and D. Wells.
The Harvester, Reaper, and Mower—by Isaac W. White. Improvement in
Drain Tiles. Farmer's Directory.
Sent post-paid. Price, fancy paper covers, 50 cents;Cloth, 75 cents.
Either of these Annuals for the three preceding years may be
had at the same prices.
ORANGE JUDD & CO.,
245 Broadway, New-York.
The American Horticultural Annual
FOR 1870.
A YEAR BOOK
FOR EVERY HOME.
The fourth number of this beautiful serial is now ready. It
contains a popular record of horticultural progress during the
past year, with other valuable articles, many of which are
illustrated with elegant engravings.
CONTENTS.
Calendars for each Month in the Year. Astronomical Memoranda. Number
of Trees, Plants, etc., required to Set an Acre. Hardy and Tender Vegetables.
Postage on Horticultural Matter. Tables of Quantities of Seed. The
Retinisporas—By Josiah Hoopes. Selecting and Saving Seeds—By Wm G.
Comstock. Inarching the Grapevine—By "Al Fresco." Apples in 1869—with
Descriptions of New Varieties—By J. A. Warder. Pears in 1869—with
Notes on some of the Newer Varieties—By P. Barry. Quinces in 1869.
Plums in 1869. Peaches in 1869—New Varieties—By F. R. Elliott. Cherries
in 1869—with Notes of New Varieties and Comments on the Nomenclature
of Older Sorts. Native Grapes in 1869. Notes on the Small Fruits in 1869—By
A. S. Fuller. Hardy Trees and Shrubs in 1869. New Roses Tested in
1869—By John Saul. The American Pomological Society. New and Interesting
Bedding and other Plants Tested in 1869—By Peter Henderson. New
or Noteworthy Vegetables in 1869—By Jas. J. H. Gregory, and others. Horticultural
implements, etc., in 1869. Horticultural and Kindred Journals.
Books upon Horticulture and Allied Subjects, published in 1869. List of
Nurserymen, Seedsmen, etc.
Sent post-paid. Price, fancy paper covers, 50 cents;Cloth, 75 cents.
Either of these Annuals for the three preceding years may be
had at the same prices.
ORANGE JUDD & CO.,
245 Broadway New-York.
[Established in 1842.]
A Good, Cheap, and very Valuable Paper for
Every Man, Woman and Child,
IN CITY, VILLAGE and COUNTRY,
THE
AMERICAN AGRICULTURIST,
FOR THE
FARM, GARDEN AND HOUSEHOLD,
Including a Special Department of Interesting and
Instructive Reading for CHILDREN and YOUTH.
The Agriculturist is a large periodical of Forty-four pages, quarto, not octavo,
beautifully printed, and filled with plain, practical, reliable, original matter, including
hundreds of beautiful and instructiveEngravings in every annual volume.
It contains each month a Calendar of Operations to be performed on the Farm,
in the Orchard and Garden, in and around the Dwelling, etc.
The thousands of hints and suggestions given in every volume are prepared by practical,
intelligent working men, who know what they talk and write about. The
articles are thoroughly edited, and every way reliable.
The Household Department is valuable to every Housekeeper, affording
very many useful hints and directions calculated to lighten and facilitate in-door work.
The Department for Children and Youth, is prepared with special care
not only to amuse, but also to inculcate knowledge and sound moral principles.
Terms.—The circulation of the American Agriculturist, (about 150,000) is so
large that it can be furnished at the low price of $1.50 a year; four copies, one year, for
$5; ten copies, one year, for $12; twenty or more copies, one year, $1 each; single
copies, 15 cents each. An extra copy to the one furnishing a club of ten or twenty.