The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Ornithologist and Oölogist. Vol. VIII
No. 3, March 1883, by Various

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of
the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org.  If you are not located in the United States, you'll have
to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook.

Title: The Ornithologist and Oölogist. Vol. VIII No. 3, March 1883
       Birds: Their Nests and Eggs

Author: Various

Editor: Joseph M. Wade

Release Date: January 4, 2019 [EBook #58612]

Language: English

Character set encoding: UTF-8

*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ORNITHOLOGIST AND OOLOGIST, MARCH 1883 ***




Produced by Stephen Hutcheson and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
produced from images generously made available by The
Internet Archive)









                             ORNITHOLOGIST
                                 —AND—
                               OÖLOGIST.


  $1.00 per      Joseph M. Wade, Editor and Publisher.     Single Copy
  Annum.               Established, March, 1875.             10 Cents.
  VOL. VIII.              BOSTON, MARCH, 1883.                  No. 3.




                           Among the Buteos.


The voices of our New England Buzzards are again ringing through their
old haunts, and it may now be seasonable to review my local notes on
their breeding habits last Spring. In short, then, I took 104 eggs. And
from other nests in my circle of observation were taken or destroyed by
farmers, hawk-hunters and others, sixty more eggs and young birds. So
until a more favored breeding range is made known I shall claim this to
be the home of the Buteos. A correspondent in Rochester writes that he
thinks as many eggs can be taken yearly in that vicinity, but until this
is shown to be true I shall not believe the distribution of species is
so equal. If this article could be accompanied by a good physical map of
Norwich and its environs, it would help greatly to support my claims. An
irregular line drawn around the city just outside the suburbs would pass
through the breeding places of sixteen pairs of Red-shouldered Hawks
which I marked down the second week in April. Except a few hemlocks, the
groves and strips of first growth are all deciduous and nearly all
nut-bearing. The red squirrel, which is not so relentlessly shot down as
his gray cousin, is amazingly plenty in these suburban woods. While
skating yesterday on Yantic cove, within the city limits, I saw seven
squirrels playing in the small patch above Christ’s church on the river
bank. Every one who has climbed to nests of young Buteos nearly fledged,
must have been astonished at the great quantity of these young rodents,
supplied by the parent birds. In one nest of Red-tailed Hawks I have
seen portions of nine red squirrels, and from another have counted out
on the ground seven entire bodies. A game bird or chicken now and then,
but red squirrels for every day bill-of-fare. Mousing, Master Buteo will
go. And frogging, too, for I have several times surprised him in muddy
sloughs in the woods, and field collectors often are called to notice
the black mud on fresh Hawk’s eggs. Given then a great food supply and
the species that follow it will be abundant. Over the grove of second
growths to the left of Love Lane, last Spring, I saw a pair of
Red-shouldered Hawks hovering for days in succession. I knew they were
not breeding in the patch, as they had not done so in former years, and
there were but three old Crow’s nests very low down. But to be very sure
I examined the grove repeatedly with care and found it to be alive with
red squirrels. In one apple-tree hole was a litter of six; in the butt
of an oak were five with eyes unopened, and the conspicuous outside
nests were many. A Barred Owl clung to the top of a white birch with one
claw, and was tearing away at a squirrel’s new domed nest with the other
claw. The Hawks had their nest with two young in the swamp beyond, and
this grove was their handy larder, and very noisy they were over their
daily grace before meat.

The Buteos’ nests from which my ’82 series was taken, were for the most
part old ones, the very few exceptions being smaller than those used for
several seasons. The use of an old nest by the Great-horned Owl is
habitual. The Barred Owl takes a hole when it can find one, and if not,
an old nest. Failing there, he builds a very small nest of the flimsiest
sort. To show the dislike of our Raptores to nidification, let me
reproduce an avian drama to which usher nature gave me a free pass and
open stall last Spring. The scene opens late in March on Plain Hill,
where a pair of Red-shouldered Hawks were furbishing up the nest in
which off and on they had bred for five years. Their dalliance was
pleasant, no doubt, but dangerously long, for a Barred Owl slipped in
and laid two eggs April 1 and 3. The Hawks were virtually indignant, and
were often seen to dash down towards the nest, as if to dispossess the
intruder, but they always wisely stopped a few inches above the snapping
bill and mass of fluffy feathers with nine points of law in its favor.
The Hawks at length went across a small swamp and re-upholstered the
nest in which the Owl bred in ’81. I now took the two Owl’s eggs,
supposing the clutch complete, but she then went across the swamp and
laid the third egg in her old tenement. When I climbed to the second
nest, with the Hawks in possession, it contained three Buteo’s eggs and
one Barred Owl’s. Blowing showed that the Owl’s egg was slightly
incubated, and it would have been interesting perhaps to have let nature
had her course with this motley clutch. The unwearied owl now went back
to the first nest and laid and hatched her second clutch of two eggs.
Ovipositing after a while again becoming a necessity for the Hawks, they
too repaired to the opening scene of our drama from high life, and after
a few noisy demonstrations against the Owl, took up their new quarters
in a tree within gunshot of the first. The nest was so small I could not
believe that even our smallest Buteo (_pennsylvanicus_), could breed in
it, though I saw the great female Red-shouldered come from it, and could
see that it was feathered through my field glass. Climbing showed it to
have a very large and bright initial egg, which was riddled with shot
the next day by so-called hawk-hunters. The marauders completed the
series of reprisals by carrying away my young owls.

Aside from my first object, I have dwelt on the final details of this
little tragedy, because it also is a fair illustration of the domestic
troubles of the Rapaciæ here in the breeding season. With every man’s
hand against them—hunter, farmer and collector—it is a continued source
of wonder that so many eggs are taken and so many hawks left. Some may
be alien birds drawn by the food supply. But as a solution to this
question it is not unreasonable to suppose that later in the season when
the farmers are busy with field work and the collector is eagerly
following the small birds in their Summer homes in the outskirts of the
woods, that made wary by pursuit, and screened by the dense foliage, the
resident Buteos manage to “steal” an occasional nest and bring up enough
young to keep up the old local race. This idea is in part born out by
the fact that in my Winter tramps through our leafless woods, I now and
then run across a Hawk’s nest which I knew was not there the year before
and the first chapter of whose life history had not been revealed to
me.—_J. M. W., Norwich, Conn._




                          Notes from Nebraska.


April 21, ’82, found my first nest of the American Long Eared Owl. ’Twas
in the forks of a small white oak tree fifteen feet from the ground and
contained five eggs ready to hatch. It resembled that of the Common
Crow, only smaller. While I was examining this nest the old birds showed
their displeasure by flying and darting close to me, continually
snapping the bill.

At times they would alight upon the ground and with spread wings and
tail flutter around, doubtless for the purpose of alluring the intruder
from their nest. The same day I found the nest of a Black Cap Chickadee
containing six fresh eggs.

April 23d I found the nest of a Screech Owl in a hollow oak tree twenty
inches below the opening. It contained three fresh eggs. From this same
tree during the Winter of 1881 and ’82 I captured five fine specimens of
this owl.

May 1st I took another set of eggs of the American Long-eared Owl. This,
like the former, contained five eggs and they were incubated about two
weeks. Another nest was found on May 4th with five eggs almost hatched.

May 6th I discovered the nest of a Red-tailed Hawk in a Red Elm tree
fifty-eight feet from the ground. After a very hard climb I found the
nest contained four (?) young about two weeks old. On the 13th of May I
found two more nests of this hawk, both of which contained eggs; one
two, and the other three.

May 18th I was informed by a herder or “Cow Boy” that he had found a
burrow on the prairie inhabited by a Burrowing Owl. The next evening
armed with a spade we repaired to the place and after digging six feet
we came upon the nest. It was about two feet under the ground and
contained nine young of various sizes, and two eggs, one of which was
pecked. The burrow was evidently made by some burrowing animal, probably
a skunk.

Cooper’s Hawk.—The following is the date of different nests found this
year: May 11th, one nest containing four fresh eggs. May 15th, one
containing four and another containing five eggs, all of which were
fresh. May 17th, two more nests containing five eggs each. These were
slightly incubated. May 11th I received a full set of eggs of the Marsh
Harrier, five in number. The nest was placed on the ground in the
prairie grass. Two more nests were found, May 18th, containing
respectively five and six eggs. These last were slightly incubated. May
17th I also found a nest of the Short-eared Owl. It was on the ground in
the prairie grass and contained eight beautiful white eggs. A good
Pointer dog is invaluable to any one collecting eggs here, as these Owls
and Hawks give chase whenever he comes near their nest. The dog will
come very handy also to find the nests of Prairie Hens, Plover, Larks,
&c.—_H. A. Kline, Polo, Ill._




                       The Prothonotary Warbler.


This beautiful little _Protonotaria citrea_ is quite rare in Kansas, yet
I had the good fortune to find four nests last June.

Early in May I saw a Downy Woodpecker making an excavation in the dead
limb of a small elm tree standing on the edge of a forest and on the
bank of the Big Blue River. I watched the tree for several days, but,
for some cause, the birds abandoned the work.

On June 9, in passing this tree I saw a bird fly from the hole so
swiftly that I could not determine the species. I hid in some bushes
near by, and after waiting about ten minutes was rewarded by seeing a
pair of the Prothonotary Warblers approach through the trees. They flew
directly to the elm tree; and, after a moment’s hesitation, the female
entered the hole, while the male flew away into the forest.

I then crept silently to the nest, which was not more than six feet
above the ground. By quickly placing my hand over the hole and allowing
sufficient opening between my thumb and finger for the admission of the
bird’s head but not its body, I easily caught the bird and examined it
at my leisure. I have frequently caught Woodpeckers, Bluebirds,
Chickadees and Wrens in this manner.

When the bird was released it uttered a short, distinct call which
brought the male bird promptly from the trees near by. They then flew
away together.

Returning to the tree I secured the nest and complement of five fresh
eggs.

This nest was composed of fine grapevine bark, dry weeds, and horse
hair. The structure was rather frail and deeply rounded. Around its
upper edge were arrayed bits of skeleton oak leaves whose delicate
lace-like tracery of veinlets gave evidence of greater taste than I had
before seen in bird architecture.

The eggs were much rounded in shape. The color was white with a pinkish
hue, and dotted with spots of brown and lavender. At the larger end
these spots were so thick as to become confluent. The eggs were similar
in size and markings.

Two more nests of this bird were reported to me on the same date, June
9. Upon visiting them I found in one five young nearly fledged, and in
the other two addled eggs.

A week or more after the discovery of the first nest I found a pair of
the birds not far from the same place. I watched them closely and
afterward frequently saw the male alone, but failed to find the nest
until after the young had left it, when I found it in the deserted nest
of a Bluebird not a hundred feet away from a dwelling house.

I identified the nest by its peculiar architecture and a few egg shells
at the base of the tree.

These four nests were alike in situation, all being in damp forests near
the river, and in deserted nests of other birds, about six or seven feet
above the ground. They were all built of like material and were
ornamented with skeleton leaves. Two of the nests were in elm trees and
two in willow stumps. I have read no description of the nest of this
warbler and do not know whether the above agrees with the experience of
older observers.—_D. E. Lantz, Manhattan, Kan._

  See pages 53 and 65, Volume vi, for other Notes.


Steal Our Articles.—Oh, yes! keep on stealing them; never mind the
credit. It’s only an article.

Subscription price, $1 per annum.




                            Wanted to Know.


Why and by whom Maryland was prefixed to “Maryland Yellow Throat,” which
a correspondent thinks should be named Maryland Black Eye.

Why, and how the “Purple Finch” received its name when it is not purple.

Why the “California Woodpecker” selects “sound acorns only to store
away” when it lives on an insect diet. William Stembeck suggests that
the acorns rather contain the germ of the grub which developes while
being in store.

Wanted to know more about the “Ash Throated Flycatcher” and “Ferruginous
Buzzard.” If Gentry has yet discovered that his statements of the
Bluebird’s migration are not true. The Hash diet he gives this bird is
beyond the power of mortal man to say whether it is true or not, but the
“Blythe and Bonny” Bluebird sings all the same, and is with us all the
year, and does often lay six blue eggs and white ones not uncommon.




                       Notes from Manhattan, Kan.


Of five nests of the Ground Robin found by me last Spring only two were
on the ground. One was six feet above ground in a greenbrier (_Smilax._)

Last Spring the Harris Sparrow remained with us until the latter part of
May. During May I found in nests of other birds several parasitic eggs
which did not resemble those of the Cowbird in shape, size or color.
They were much smaller, elongated in shape, and the markings were
lighter. I found many Cowbirds’ eggs later but none like these. The
query presented itself whether the Harris Sparrow could have laid these.

Oct. 1, 1882.—Saw a Mourning Dove sitting on two eggs, apparently fresh.

Dec. 30.—Saw thousands of Bluebirds and Robins in the woods. Saw two
Ground Robins, (_Pipilo erythrophthalmus._)—_D. E. Lantz._


    [Illustration: Tern swallowing a fish]

Clark on “Gull Island.”—This young Tern was about two-thirds grown,
without feathers, only sprouting quills, and was covered with thick gray
down, and the fish, a Herring, was fully as long as the bird, and very
nearly as heavy, and was about half swallowed. They lay on the ground,
the bird flat on its side, and I supposed it was dead, but lifting it up
and removing the fish I found the bird was all right and ready for
another. The head of the fish was partly digested. I would not suppose
it possible for a Roseate Tern to have captured or carried to land so
large a fish—much less such a little fellow attempt to deglutinate so
immense a morsel proportionably.—_John N. Clark, Old Saybrook, Conn._


Naturalist Manual.—We have received from the author, Oliver Davie, of
Columbus, Ohio, a small 8vo. book of 125 pages with the above title. It
is a compilation from the best sources, chiefly Baird, Brewer and
Ridgway, and is intended for collectors of Birds, Nests and Eggs, with
full instructions how to collect and how to preserve them. It is a most
excellent plan partially carried out, being from _Turdidæ_ to
_Tanagridæ_. It is just the book for young ornithologists and those
working in the field, and equally valuable as a book of reference for
any devotee to the science. We hope Oliver will get encouragement enough
to complete the work at no distant day.

We also received a fine cabinet photograph of two Golden Eagles, mounted
by Mr. Davie.




                           Technical Matters.


Our ideas on technical terms are not well understood by some of our
readers. We have the highest regard for advanced scientists and closet
naturalists, but as scientists from education and force of habit write
only in their technical language, which young naturalists cannot
understand, we have considered it a duty to our young aspirants for
ornithological knowledge to publish bird life in plain English, always
giving scientific terms, but only once, after that the English name
only. We are in perfect harmony with science. We are antagonistic to
nothing that is honest in nature. We claim the right to express our
views when ornithological trash is placed upon the market for our
patrons to buy. We are antagonistic to no other publication. We claim
the right to point out what we believe to be errors, wherever found.
This is our platform and please remember it, and don’t forget that our
readers are hungry for every item of genuine news relating to the life
history of our birds, which will be thankfully received; and whenever
possible take the name, both English and scientific, direct from the
check list. If any other list but the Smithsonian is used give the name,
describe your observations carefully, always bearing in mind that too
much dry science tends to rob a subject of its general interest.




                            “Birds of Ohio.”


Our thanks are tendered to a friend who kindly remembered us with two
copies of this work, which we have looked over as carefully as our
limited time would admit. Our first search was for something new, but we
found it not; we turned to the Snowy Owls, expecting that the author
would either prove or disprove Audubon’s story of shore birds at the
Falls of the Ohio, or at least have something to say about it, but not a
word. It would seem to us that the author did not read the
ornithological literature of the day, did not have any wide-awake
correspondents in the field, and had but a limited library of reference.
We are sorry that he has made such poor use of the State’s money, and
yet Doctor J. M. Wharton, the author, states that it has been six years
in preparation. The time has been badly spent and he has lost a golden
opportunity of doing a good work for the ornithologists of America.


“Wood Ducks.”—We have received an uncolored copy of Mr. Sheppard’s “Wood
Ducks,” which is a phototype by F. Gutekunst in the best style of the
art, and is from a fine colored drawing by Mr. Sheppard, which we had
the pleasure of seeing at the Academy of Natural Science. The Wood Ducks
are a beautiful group and very life-like. Our readers will do well to
secure a copy of this work at the low price at which uncolored copies
are offered.

Doctor Coues Said It.—The _Nuttall Bulletin_ for January opens with a
very pretty gossipy article by Dr. Coues, advertising the new edition of
his “Key to North American Birds,” which is fast approaching completion.
In this article the Dr. “suggests the propriety of calling a Congress of
American Ornithologists to discuss, vote upon, and decide each case in
which the Doctors disagree.” We have no room to discuss the question in
this number, but simply for the present to place it on record, for it is
a very important matter. The Doctor compliments the O. and O. through
something with a fearful name. We hunted it up, and found it was a bird,
and with a lovely English name. Why, Dr., how could you make such a
mistake?




                           Ipswich Sparrows.


On Nov. 21, ’82, I had occasion to go to Ram Island Beach. This is a
wide sandy beach some fifty acres in extent, and covered with beach
grass, and in some parts with bushes and small cedars. As I was about to
leave I saw several sparrows fly up and alight on the cedars, and at the
first glance it struck me that they were Ipswich Sparrows, and as if to
convince me a Song Sparrow flew up beside one of them, showing off the
large size and pale tints of the former very markedly. Having no gun I
reluctantly left, but returned in the afternoon, and after some hunting
secured all three of them. Two of them measured 6½ inches in length; the
3d 6 in. Since then I have searched the beach over carefully but found
no more specimens of _Passerculus princeps_. Saw flocks of Lesser
Redpolls on Dec. 5th and 6th.

Pine Finches were abundant here in the Fall. Mr. Worthington secured
sixteen at one shot. Some small boys killed two.—_Moses B. Griffing,
Shelter Island, N. Y._




                    Capt. Chas. E. Bendire, U. S. A.


Under date of Dec. 29th we have a long letter from the Captain detailing
many of the duties at his new post, which seems so far to quite fully
occupy his time; so much so that what spare time he does get is entirely
taken up collecting and making specimens, so that instead of writing
notes for our readers, he is making them to be used in the future. We
will make a few extracts from his letter such as will interest our
readers generally: “However with all the drawbacks I am making some
headway in my collection, and am getting some good things. I have now
catalogued 375 skins since my arrival here, and 300 of these I have made
since Sept 1st, besides a great many alcoholic specimens not counted in
the above. We are having a mild Winter, the snow is only about a foot
deep, when in other seasons it has been three feet deep at this time.
Birds are scarce—about twenty species comprise the more common Winter
residents. The water birds are too far off for me to trouble them
much—the nearest point on the lake is ten miles. I had hoped to find
some rare Winter birds and plenty of them as at Camp Harney in ’75 and
’76, but there are very few, and even Owls and Hawks are not near as
plenty about the post here as at Walla Walla. I presume the marshes near
the lake are full of them, but they are almost impassible. When the lake
and marsh freeze over I expect a lot of birds will be driven up toward
the post, and by that time very likely there will be so much snow that I
cannot get the birds.”

It has been whispered among a few that Captain Bendire was to take up
American Oology where the late Dr. Brewer left it, and it is to be
earnestly hoped that this will be brought about at no distant day, for
the department can well afford to do it as a very large edition would
find a ready sale if it was found necessary to sell it, as the
department now does the first volume, besides being one of the very few
capable of undertaking this work. There was a warm friendship between
him and the late Dr. Brewer that the death of the latter has not in the
least diminished in the other. For the above reasons Captain Bendire is
the one above all others to finish the work so well begun by his friend
the late lamented Dr. Brewer.




                   Night Herons Breeding on the Marsh


While collecting on the marsh I noticed many Night Herons, and enquired
of the hunters and trappers if they found any nests in the trees on the
islands in the marsh, but they did not, but had found the nesting place
on the marsh. I went for them with a boy for guide. We rowed up a
channel as near the place as possible, when they began to leave their
nests in the grass and rushes. When forty rods off we left the boat and
waded. The bogs are a kind of floating sod, with two or three feet of
mud and water under them, and sink at each step. The first nest was in
the rushes and built of rushes, about one foot high and about the same
width, with just hollow enough to keep the eggs from rolling out. Other
nests were in the grass, but most of them were in the cat tail flags, in
holes which had been burned in the dry time. The nests in the flags were
built of pieces of flags, both leaves and stalk. Those in the grass were
built of rushes and flags. The nests contained from one to five eggs
each, but mostly three—two sets of five and a number with four. I took
about forty sets that day—the larger sets were incubated, but about half
were fresh. I went a second time to the marsh and got a lot of
eggs.—_Delos Hatch, Oak Centre, Wis._




                           Brief Newsy Notes.


Black-backed Woodpecker.—In Michigan, while camping about fifteen miles
from Little Traverse Bay, I saw three specimens, but not having a gun I
did not secure any.—_W. J. Simpson._

Large Set of Eggs.—April 29, ’82, took a set of seven Bluebirds’ eggs,
and April 30 I took a set of six pure white eggs from Bluebirds of the
natural color.—_W. J. Simpson, Ithaca, N. Y._

Barred Owl.—A very fine specimen was brought me by a friend a few days
ago, who, while driving along saw it perched on the fence. A club was
thrown at it, but as it did not move my friend walked up to it and found
it was blind. He lifted it into his sleigh and brought it in, when I
found that the bird had had iritis, in which extreme adhesions had taken
place, rendering the eyes almost wholly useless. The bird has a fine
plumage although almost a skeleton.—_G. A. McCallum, Dunville, Ontario._

Ornithological works, written by honest, conscientious men, never
deteriorate in value, but advance to a premium as soon as the edition is
exhausted.

Bluebirds. As I am writing this 10 A. M. I think I hear a Bluebird, and
on going to the window I see three sitting on the vane of the church
across the street from the house. Now we can hardly put this down as the
earliest arrival for ’83, but it’s certainly the latest for ’82.—_W. W.
Coe, Portland, Conn., Dec. 31, 1882._

Sharp-shinned Hawk.—S. F. Rathbun, Auburn, N. Y., reports shooting a
Sharp-shinned Hawk, Jan. 16.

Ring-billed Gull.—April 29, ’82, I shot a specimen of _Larus
Delawarensis_ at Rochester, N. Y. It proved to be an adult female;
length 21.50 inches, extent 49.50.—_C. H. Wilder, Syracuse, N. Y._

Spotted Sandpiper.—July 12, ’82. Saw a Sandpiper (probably the spotted)
with something that looked like a minnow in its bill. Do they eat
fish?—_C. H. Wilder, Syracuse, N. Y._

King Fisher shot at Portland, Conn., Jan. 14, in good plumage.—_W. W.
Coe._

Owls.—Messrs. Southwick & Jencks report about 150 Owls this season—about
seventy-five Barred Owls, and including all the varieties but Great Gray
and Hawk Owls. Among them is a Sparrow Owl taken near Providence and
nineteen Snowy Owls, one nearly white.

Golden Eagle.—A. D. Butterfield, San Jose, California, shot a young male
Golden Eagle, Dec. 20, 1882, which measured 33 inches in length, 6 feet
5½ inches across the wings, 24 inch wing, 24 inch tail. A good skin was
made from it.

Pine Grosbeaks.—Saw six Pine Grosbeaks, Dec. 17. They were very
tame—almost touched one with my hand—no old ones among them—these are
the first specimens noted this season.—_John H. Sage._

A Snowy Owl was seen here on Sunday and followed across the river but
not killed.—_John H. Sage, Portland, Conn._

Eggs in a Set.—May 30, ’81, found set of five Catbird’s eggs—nest in
hazel bush. In West Newton, Mass., June 20, ’81, found set of six
Bluebirds in bird box. In Peotine, Ill., have found seven American
Bittern; usual set three or four and sometimes five. Also a set of seven
White-rumped Shrike; usual set five; have found six.—_D. H. Eaton,
Woburn, Mass._

Albino Redwing Blackbird, (_Agelæus phœniceus_).—From a flock of Redwing
“Starlings” I shot an Albino of a beautiful Golden Yellow except the
wings which are white. The iris and tarsus were pink.—_Dr. F. W. Goding,
Kaneville, Ill., September 1, 1881._

Clapper Rails’ Eggs.—During the season of 1881 1,000 eggs were taken
from a tract of land not two miles square, and yet not half was taken
that could have been. These eggs were taken to sell for cooking purposes
in New York market.

The World Moves and so do some of our young men. Southwick & Jencks are
out with a new Checking List that leaves ours in the shade, and they are
preparing a catalogue that will excel anything yet produced in that
line. These two boys have got a collection together that is worth going
a very long distance to see, only leave your wallet at home, and “Lead
us not into temptation.”

“Brown Creeper,” (_Certhia familiaris_,) winters in dense woods, but
very rarely.—_A. Hall, East Rockport, Ohio._

Wild Goose.—I saw a Wild Goose last night that was shot January 4 in the
Middlefield Reservoir, two or three miles out of the City of Middletown.
He had been seen in several places within a few miles of here all
Winter. Could fly well enough and I could find no wounds on him except
the fresh ones. “Every day brings something new.”—_W. W. Coe, Portland,
Conn._

J. L. Goff writes that this Goose had been in the company of a flock of
crows during the Winter.

Albino Cowbird.—Aug. 11, 1881, while at Kaneville, Ill., I shot an
Albino Cowbird (_Molothrus ater._) It measured 7½ inches long and was of
a creamy white color with the exception of the head and breast, which
were a little more on the yellow tint. It was with a flock of Redwing
Blackbirds. When I picked it up its eyes shone like fire. The iris was
of a fire red. The pupil being pink the effect can be imagined. I could
not discern the sex.—_Jos. L. Hancock, Chicago, Ill._




                          Transcriber’s Notes


—Silently corrected a few typos.

—Retained publication information from the printed edition: this eBook
  is public-domain in the country of publication.

—In the text versions only, text in italics is delimited by
  _underscores_.







End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Ornithologist and Oölogist. Vol
 VIII No. 3, March 1883, by Various

*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ORNITHOLOGIST AND OOLOGIST, MARCH 1883 ***

***** This file should be named 58612-0.txt or 58612-0.zip *****
This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
        http://www.gutenberg.org/5/8/6/1/58612/

Produced by Stephen Hutcheson and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
produced from images generously made available by The
Internet Archive)

Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
States without permission and without paying copyright
royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive
specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook
for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports,
performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given
away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks
not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the
trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
1.E.8.

1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
country outside the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

  This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
  most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
  restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
  under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
  eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
  United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you
  are located before using this ebook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg-tm License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
provided that

* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
  the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
  you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
  to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
  agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
  Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
  within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
  legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
  payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
  Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
  Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
  Literary Archive Foundation."

* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
  you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
  does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
  License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
  copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
  all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
  works.

* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
  any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
  electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
  receipt of the work.

* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
  distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The
Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm
trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm

Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
www.gutenberg.org



Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.

The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the
mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its
volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous
locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt
Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to
date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and
official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

For additional contact information:

    Dr. Gregory B. Newby
    Chief Executive and Director
    gbnewby@pglaf.org

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works.

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org

This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.