The Salt requisite system is used to create relationships between states. The core idea being that, when one state is dependent somehow on another, that inter-dependency can be easily defined.
Requisites come in two types: Direct requisites (such as require
),
and requisite_ins (such as require_in
). The relationships are
directional: a direct requisite requires something from another state.
However, a requisite_in inserts a requisite into the targeted state pointing to
the targeting state. The following example demonstrates a direct requisite:
vim:
pkg.installed: []
/etc/vimrc:
file.managed:
- source: salt://edit/vimrc
- require:
- pkg: vim
In the example above, the file /etc/vimrc
depends on the vim package.
Requisite_in statements are the opposite. Instead of saying "I depend on something", requisite_ins say "Someone depends on me":
vim:
pkg.installed:
- require_in:
- file: /etc/vimrc
/etc/vimrc:
file.managed:
- source: salt://edit/vimrc
So here, with a requisite_in, the same thing is accomplished as in the first
example, but the other way around. The vim package is saying "/etc/vimrc depends
on me". This will result in a require
being inserted into the
/etc/vimrc
state which targets the vim
state.
In the end, a single dependency map is created and everything is executed in a finite and predictable order.
Note
Requisite matching
Requisites match on both the ID Declaration and the name
parameter.
This means that, in the example above, the require_in
requisite would
also have been matched if the /etc/vimrc
state was written as follows:
vimrc:
file.managed:
- name: /etc/vimrc
- source: salt://edit/vimrc
There are six direct requisite statements that can be used in Salt:
require
, watch
, prereq
, use
, onchanges
, and onfail
.
Each direct requisite also has a corresponding requisite_in: require_in
,
watch_in
, prereq_in
, use_in
, onchanges_in
, and onfail_in
.
All of the requisites define specific relationships and always work with the
dependency logic defined above.
The use of require
demands that the dependent state executes before the
depending state. The state containing the require
requisite is defined as the
depending state. The state specified in the require
statement is defined as the
dependent state. If the dependent state's execution succeeds, the depending state
will then execute. If the dependent state's execution fails, the depending state
will not execute. In the first example above, the file /etc/vimrc
will only
execute after the vim package is installed successfully.
As of Salt 0.16.0, it is possible to require an entire sls file. Do this first by
including the sls file and then setting a state to require
the included sls file:
include:
- foo
bar:
pkg.installed:
- require:
- sls: foo
watch
statements are used to add additional behavior when there are changes
in other states.
Note
If a state should only execute when another state has changes, and
otherwise do nothing, the new onchanges
requisite should be used
instead of watch
. watch
is designed to add additional behavior
when there are changes, but otherwise execute normally.
The state containing the watch
requisite is defined as the watching
state. The state specified in the watch
statement is defined as the watched
state. When the watched state executes, it will return a dictionary containing
a key named "changes". Here are two examples of state return dictionaries,
shown in json for clarity:
"local": {
"file_|-/tmp/foo_|-/tmp/foo_|-directory": {
"comment": "Directory /tmp/foo updated",
"__run_num__": 0,
"changes": {
"user": "bar"
},
"name": "/tmp/foo",
"result": true
}
}
"local": {
"pkgrepo_|-salt-minion_|-salt-minion_|-managed": {
"comment": "Package repo 'salt-minion' already configured",
"__run_num__": 0,
"changes": {},
"name": "salt-minion",
"result": true
}
}
If the "result" of the watched state is True
, the watching state will
execute normally. This part of watch
mirrors the functionality of the
require
requisite. If the "result" of the watched state is False
, the
watching state will never run, nor will the watching state's mod_watch
function execute.
However, if the "result" of the watched state is True
, and the "changes"
key contains a populated dictionary (changes occurred in the watched state),
then the watch
requisite can add additional behavior. This additional
behavior is defined by the mod_watch
function within the watching state
module. If the mod_watch
function exists in the watching state module, it
will be called in addition to the normal watching state. The return data
from the mod_watch
function is what will be returned to the master in this
case; the return data from the main watching function is discarded.
If the "changes" key contains an empty dictionary, the watch
requisite acts
exactly like the require
requisite (the watching state will execute if
"result" is True
, and fail if "result" is False
in the watched state).
Note
Not all state modules contain mod_watch
. If mod_watch
is absent
from the watching state module, the watch
requisite behaves exactly
like a require
requisite.
A good example of using watch
is with a service.running
state. When a service watches a state, then
the service is reloaded/restarted when the watched state changes, in addition
to Salt ensuring that the service is running.
ntpd:
service.running:
- watch:
- file: /etc/ntp.conf
file.managed:
- name: /etc/ntp.conf
- source: salt://ntp/files/ntp.conf
New in version 0.16.0.
prereq
allows for actions to be taken based on the expected results of
a state that has not yet been executed. The state containing the prereq
requisite is defined as the pre-requiring state. The state specified in the
prereq
statement is defined as the pre-required state.
When a prereq
requisite is evaluated, the pre-required state reports if it
expects to have any changes. It does this by running the pre-required single
state as a test-run by enabling test=True
. This test-run will return a
dictionary containing a key named "changes". (See the watch
section above
for examples of "changes" dictionaries.)
If the "changes" key contains a populated dictionary, it means that the pre-required state expects changes to occur when the state is actually executed, as opposed to the test-run. The pre-requiring state will now actually run. If the pre-requiring state executes successfully, the pre-required state will then execute. If the pre-requiring state fails, the pre-required state will not execute.
If the "changes" key contains an empty dictionary, this means that changes are not expected by the pre-required state. Neither the pre-required state nor the pre-requiring state will run.
The best way to define how prereq
operates is displayed in the following
practical example: When a service should be shut down because underlying code
is going to change, the service should be off-line while the update occurs. In
this example, graceful-down
is the pre-requiring state and site-code
is the pre-required state.
graceful-down:
cmd.run:
- name: service apache graceful
- prereq:
- file: site-code
site-code:
file.recurse:
- name: /opt/site_code
- source: salt://site/code
In this case the apache server will only be shutdown if the site-code state expects to deploy fresh code via the file.recurse call. The site-code deployment will only be executed if the graceful-down run completes successfully.
New in version 2014.7.0.
The onfail
requisite allows for reactions to happen strictly as a response
to the failure of another state. This can be used in a number of ways, such as
executing a second attempt to set up a service or begin to execute a separate
thread of states because of a failure.
The onfail
requisite is applied in the same way as require
as watch
:
primary_mount:
mount.mounted:
- name: /mnt/share
- device: 10.0.0.45:/share
- fstype: nfs
backup_mount:
mount.mounted:
- name: /mnt/share
- device: 192.168.40.34:/share
- fstype: nfs
- onfail:
- mount: primary_mount
New in version 2014.7.0.
The onchanges
requisite makes a state only apply if the required states
generate changes, and if the watched state's "result" is True
. This can be
a useful way to execute a post hook after changing aspects of a system.
The use
requisite is used to inherit the arguments passed in another
id declaration. This is useful when many files need to have the same defaults.
/etc/foo.conf:
file.managed:
- source: salt://foo.conf
- template: jinja
- mkdirs: True
- user: apache
- group: apache
- mode: 755
/etc/bar.conf
file.managed:
- source: salt://bar.conf
- use:
- file: /etc/foo.conf
The use
statement was developed primarily for the networking states but
can be used on any states in Salt. This makes sense for the networking state
because it can define a long list of options that need to be applied to
multiple network interfaces.
The use
statement does not inherit the requisites arguments of the
targeted state. This means also a chain of use
requisites would not
inherit inherited options.
All of the requisites also have corresponding requisite_in versions, which do
the reverse of their normal counterparts. The examples below all use
require_in
as the example, but note that all of the _in
requisites work
the same way: They result in a normal requisite in the targeted state, which
targets the state which has defines the requisite_in. Thus, a require_in
causes the target state to require
the targeting state. Similarly, a
watch_in
causes the target state to watch
the targeting state. This
pattern continues for the rest of the requisites.
If a state declaration needs to be required by another state declaration then
require_in
can accommodate it. Therefore, these two sls files would be the
same in the end:
Using require
httpd:
pkg.installed: []
service.running:
- require:
- pkg: httpd
Using require_in
httpd:
pkg.installed:
- require_in:
- service: httpd
service.running: []
The require_in
statement is particularly useful when assigning a require
in a separate sls file. For instance it may be common for httpd to require
components used to set up PHP or mod_python, but the HTTP state does not need
to be aware of the additional components that require it when it is set up:
http.sls
httpd:
pkg.installed: []
service.running:
- require:
- pkg: httpd
php.sls
include:
- http
php:
pkg.installed:
- require_in:
- service: httpd
mod_python.sls
include:
- http
mod_python:
pkg.installed:
- require_in:
- service: httpd
Now the httpd server will only start if php or mod_python are first verified to be installed. Thus allowing for a requisite to be defined "after the fact".
The state altering system is used to make sure that states are evaluated exactly as the user expects. It can be used to double check that a state preformed exactly how it was expected to, or to make 100% sure that a state only runs under certain conditions. The use of unless or onlyif options help make states even more stateful. The check_cmds option helps ensure that the result of a state is evaluated correctly.
New in version 2014.7.0.
The unless
requisite specifies that a state should only run when any of
the specified commands return False
. The unless
requisite operates
as NOR and is useful in giving more granular control over when a state should
execute.
vim:
pkg.installed:
- unless:
- rpm -q vim-enhanced
- ls /usr/bin/vim
In the example above, the state will only run if either the vim-enhanced
package is not installed (returns False
) or if /usr/bin/vim does not
exist (returns False
). The state will run if both commands return
False
.
However, the state will not run if both commands return True
.
New in version 2014.7.0.
onlyif
is the opposite of unless
. If all of the commands in onlyif
return True
, then the state is run. If any of the specified commands
return False
, the state will not run.
stop-volume:
module.run:
- name: glusterfs.stop_volume
- m_name: work
- onlyif:
- gluster volume status work
- order: 1
remove-volume:
module.run:
- name: glusterfs.delete
- m_name: work
- onlyif:
- gluster volume info work
- watch:
- cmd: stop-volume
The above example ensures that the stop_volume and delete modules only run if the gluster commands return a 0 ret value.
New in version 2014.7.0.
Check Command is used for determining that a state did or did not run as expected.
comment-repo:
file.replace:
- path: /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo
- pattern: ^enabled=0
- repl: enabled=1
- check_cmd:
- grep 'enabled=0' /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo && return 1 || return 0
This will attempt to do a replace on all enabled=0 in the .repo file, and replace them with enabled=1. The check_cmd is just a bash command. It will do a grep for enabled=0 in the file, and if it finds any, it will return a 0, which will prompt the && portion of the command to return a 1, causing check_cmd to set the state as failed. If it returns a 1, meaning it didn't find any 'enabled=0' it will hit the || portion of the command, returning a 0, and declaring the function succeeded.
There are two commands used for the above checks.
mod_run_check is used to check for onlyif and unless. If the goal is to override the global check for these to variables, include a mod_run_check in the salt/states/ file.
mod_run_check_cmd is used to check for the check_cmd options. To override this one, include a mod_run_check_cmd in the states file for the state.